[quote]Surprisingly, when a photon is observed, it behaves either as a particle or as a wave. But both aspects are never observed simultaneously. In fact, which behaviour it exhibits depends on the type of measurement it is presented with. These astonishing phenomena have been experimentally investigated in the last few years, using measurement devices that can be switched between wave-like and particle-like measurements.[/quote]
What first was so mysterious sounds so fucking obvious now..
So it's basically a Shrödinger's Cat-duality? It's hypothetically in both states at the same time, yet is forcibly isolated to one when we try to measure it?
[QUOTE=Im Crimson;38279595]So it's basically a Shrödinger's Cat-duality? It's hypothetically in both states at the same time, yet is forcibly isolated to one when we try to measure it?[/QUOTE]
Why can't you put both measuring methods together and get both then?
-snip-
Suddenly, all became clear.
Its a partave
or a waveicle
All particles, not just photons act like both a wave and a particle. But everything bigger than electrons are so big that the wavelength of their wave-form is absurdly tiny to the point of not mattering.
The point is that thy don't act like waves or particles, but both at the same time, and you'll see them as different things depending on how you detect them. This is important because previously we've had to do separate experiments to see photons act as a wave and a particle, whereas now we can detect it doing both at the same time.
"Why can't we measure both?"
[IMG]http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/244/457/793.gif[/IMG]
But in all seriousness, this actually sheds a lot of light on the issue. It wasn't too long ago that I couldn't begin to comprehend Quantum Mechanics. It's all starting to make sense now.
My Chemistry 001 class just went over Einstien's photoelectric experiment today as well as quantized energy levels or whatever. Gotta say, he explained it pretty well and glossed over enough that everyone there had a vague understanding.
[QUOTE=Ereunity;38279715]Why can't you put both measuring methods together and get both then?[/QUOTE]
How would you put the measuring methods together then? Measuring it traditionally will collapse the superposition into either state (or at least in one observable state). Of course you could fire a pulse of electrons into a device that measures if part of the electrons act as a wave and the other part acts like particles. But you cannot do those both to a individual electron, because the first one would collapse the wave function. Unless, you use some kind of quantum mechanical technique (which I don't yet understand) to measure it, like they did here.
"What's that? You want the universe to operate in a sensible manner? Sorry but it's not quite in the cards buddy."
-Quantum Mechanics.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.