[hd]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1k6DQQ1gU0[/hd]
Its [URL="http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/7165412/Chris-Evans-sweary-rant.html"]the Sun[/URL] so i refrain from posting this in the News section but apperantly Chris went on a rant in the studio because the audience didn't laugh at his jokes and filming took 4 hours.
I keep saying I want to give it a chance but on the off chance the interior shenanigans are true then damn, it doesn't sound hopeful.
I'm still going to give it a chance because of Matt LeBlanc
I just realized how weird it's going to be having the three stooges doing reviews on a track that isn't the Top Gear test track
Matt LeBlanc still seems like he will be alright.
[QUOTE=The_J_Hat;50378281]I'm still going to give it a chance because of Matt LeBlanc[/QUOTE]
I do wonder what does the original trio think of him nowadays.
[QUOTE=Rocâ„¢;50378316]I do wonder what does the original trio think of him nowadays.[/QUOTE]
There's probably no ill will against the hosts. It's a lucrative gig
I could imagine Clarkson saying what matt says in this teaser word for word maybe without the reference to tinder
I assume this is a deliberate choice by producers
Obviously there's time to be proven wrong, but I think they would have done well to have given this incarnation of Top Gear a new identity. As it stands, it just looks like the same stuff with different people... while we already have the same stuff with the same people coming up elsewhere.
Its hard to judge on a teaser but....mm i'm honestly not sure, i feel the only reason to watch this will be Matt Le Blanc
Honestly the only parts I'm really interested in are the Hoonigan and Matt LeBlanc :v:.
Don't have high hopes about the presenters but i'll still give it at try because of the cinematography as stupid as that sounds, 'original' Top Gear had just so many beautiful shots of gorgeous cars, it's basically porn
At least he pronounced Glasgow right
[QUOTE=kill3r;50378338]I could imagine Clarkson saying what matt says in this teaser word for word maybe without the reference to tinder
I assume this is a deliberate choice by producers[/QUOTE]
I dunno, Clarkson could probably get away with it. With a trademarked "...whatever one of those is" thrown in after it at least.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.