• 9/11 Truth movement holds series of press conferences
    333 replies, posted
[IMG]http://www.reuters.com/resources_v2/images/logo.gif[/IMG] [Quote]NEW YORK and LOS ANGELES, Sept. 9 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- On the eve of the 9th anniversary of 9/11, support for the war in Afghanistan took a serious blow today. Simultaneous press conferences were held in New York and Los Angeles to present startling new information refuting the official 9/11 narrative, used to justify the war. [B]Also announced were three major professional groups which have joined the worldwide, and ever-growing, "9/11 Truth Movement."[/B] [B]In a striking show of unity, representatives of "[URL="http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/"]Scientists for 9/11 Truth[/URL]," "[URL="http://www.militaryofficersfor911truth.org/"]U.S. Military Officers for 9/11 Truth[/URL]" and "[URL="http://www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org/"]Actors & Artists for 9/11 Truth[/URL]" presented their findings and unveiled their eye-opening websites. [/B]Each non-profit group has launched a petition calling for a new, transparent investigation. [B]In NY, representing "Scientists," Professor Niels Harrit said, "The official account put forth by NIST violates the fundamental laws of physics and chemistry."[/B] Harrit is Prof. Emeritus at the University of Copenhagen and was lead author for a 2009 peer-reviewed study that revealed evidence of [URL="http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/docs/Harrit_active_thermite.pdf"]high tech explosives throughout the WTC dust[/URL]. [B]In LA, physics teacher David Chandler discussed the swift destruction of the WTC towers, including Building 7, the little-known third tower. Having demonstrated its free fall, he confronted the US government agency NIST with his [URL="http://www.youtube.com/user/DavidChandler911"]analyses[/URL] and forced NIST to revise its November 2008 [URL="http://wtc.nist.gov/"]Final Report on WTC 7[/URL]. NIST's [URL="http://wtc.nist.gov/comments08/"]Draft Report[/URL] had claimed free fall was impossible but NIST ultimately acknowledged WTC 7 was in absolute free fall for over two seconds.[/B] Concluded Chandler, [B]"Free fall is physically impossible without explosives." [/B] In LA, former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development Lt. Col. Robert Bowman stated, [B]"9/11 has been an excuse to use our brave young troops as cannon fodder in unjust wars of aggression."[/B] In NY, Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford, decorated fighter pilot, and USAF Accident Investigator Lt. Col. David Gapp in LA, questioned how four highly trained flight crews would all break protocol, reporting, "Not one pilot broadcast the required hijack transponder codes." [B]In LA, actor John Heard asked, "How is it possible that the worst crime in U.S. history has never been properly investigated?" [/B]In NY, actor Daniel Sunjata stated, "The August 20th AP poll has revealed that only 38% of the American people support the war in Afghanistan, down from 46% in March. [B]The question is: does this 38% know about the evidence that we have presented today?"[/B] Signatories to their petition include Ed Asner, Graham Nash, Willie Nelson, Michelle Phillips and Gore Vidal. The three groups at the websites below are independent, non-profit organizations calling for the reinvestigation of the September 11th attacks. [B]These groups have no affiliation to any political party.[/B][/Quote]Looks like the whistleblowers are starting to come out. What have you 9/11-truth naysayers have to say about this? [URL="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS204116+09-Sep-2010+PRN20100909"]source[/URL]
I think most people will sit on the fence about this, reason being that thinking that the US government carried this out is extreme, yet to also think Al Quaeda could have carried out what was a fairly sophisticated attack, is also extreme, both eventualities are far fetched. I work as a structural designer (one under structural engineer) and have always been fairly sceptical about the events of 9/11, a building just does not fail to fire like that, especially a steelwork structure.
I lol'd
oh god and the fucking tea partiers aren't bad enough, we need to deal with these assholes god damnit, it's like a ten thousand man strong team of BurnEmDowns.
Should be interesting, especially if scientists are saying it can't happen.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25132159] Looks like the whistleblowers are starting to come out. What have you 9/11-truth naysayers have to say about this? [/QUOTE] You're still insane?
That's actually quite interesting.
build two new WTC towers identical to the last ones and fly planes into them to see if they fall the same way problem solved
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25132159][IMG]http://www.reuters.com/resources_v2/images/logo.gif[/IMG] Looks like the whistleblowers are starting to come out. What have you 9/11-truth naysayers have to say about this? [URL="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS204116+09-Sep-2010+PRN20100909"]source[/URL][/QUOTE] It's obvious that Shukaido is slowly losing his mind.
Uh oh a school physics teacher said it's wrong!
[QUOTE=ChestyMcGee;25132436]Uh oh a school physics teacher said it's wrong![/QUOTE] [quote] Harrit is Prof. Emeritus at the University of Copenhagen[/quote] :raise:
[QUOTE=robowurmz;25132580]:raise:[/QUOTE] Nah, what does a physics professor know about physics. :downs:
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25132159][IMG]http://www.reuters.com/resources_v2/images/logo.gif[/IMG] Looks like the whistleblowers are starting to come out. What have you 9/11-truth naysayers have to say about this? [URL="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS204116+09-Sep-2010+PRN20100909"]source[/URL][/QUOTE] Yeah it's not like liars or crazy people exist.
[QUOTE=Géza!;25132611]Nah, what does a physics professor know about physics. :downs:[/QUOTE] Depends, there are different fields of physics. A physics professor is also not qualified to speak about structural engineering as an authority. [editline]02:13PM[/editline] Also the article has a false statement in it, I will be contacting Reuters about this, as well. The NIST report even says that not even the 18 story penthouse fell at free fall speeds: [quote=NIST] The time that the roofline took to fall 18 stories or 73.8 m (242 ft) was approximately 5.4 s. The theoretical time for free fall (i.e., at gravitational acceleration) was computed from (equation, FP doesn't support LaTeX) where t = time, s; h = distance, m (ft); and g = gravitational acceleration, 9.81 m/s2 (32.2 ft/s2). This time was approximately 3.9 s. Thus, the average time for the upper 18 stories collapse, based on video evidence, was approximately 40 percent longer than the computed free fall time. [/quote]
In NY, actor Daniel Sunjata stated actor Daniel Sunjata actor
That's it. I really think it's time that 9/11 truth threads were made a ban. All they ever do is shite up ITN. And it's pretty shat up at the best of times.
Let me clarify: because this thread is about 9/11, the people involved should be discredited, the subject banned, and the people involved deemed insane. :protarget:
It's a big conspiracy
When I am given evidence from an unbiased source that shows that there was foul play in the tower collapse then I'll believe. Until then, no.
Who do you think those people are? They have no political affiliations. These are just scientists, military officials, and citizens with some common sense coming forward with their side of the story based on evidence they've gathered. How is that at all biased?
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25133663]Let me clarify: because this thread is about 9/11, the people involved should be discredited, the subject banned, and the people involved deemed insane. :protarget:[/QUOTE] More or less. These threads are horrendously redundant, regardless of anyone's opinion on the subject.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25133767]Who do you think those people are? They have no political affiliations. These are just scientists, military officials, and citizens with some common sense coming forward with their side of the story based on evidence they've gathered. How is that at all biased?[/QUOTE] The second two classes don't matter for shit, and no scientist from a relevant field has come forward saying they disagree with the NIST report on it's conclusions. Straight physics is not relevant to structural engineering.
[QUOTE=Led Zeppelin;25133785]More or less. These threads are horrendously redundant, regardless of anyone's opinion on the subject.[/QUOTE] Satire eludes you. The only thing redundant about these threads is the subject, what is involved and the controversies surrounding it that keep popping up are what the threads should be focused on.
So explain to me why the U.S. government would want to blow their own buildings, Im not feeling too clever right now.
[QUOTE=Kagrenak;25133815]The second two classes don't matter for shit, and no scientist from a relevant field has come forward saying they disagree with the NIST report on it's conclusions. Straight physics is not relevant to structural engineering.[/QUOTE] I'll agree with you that civilians have limited knowledge into what the truth is/may be. But who have incredible sway in this discussion were the people [I]within [/I]our government in the military who are calling out foul play. They should most certainly not be ignored. Also, you assume that only physicists are coming out against this, when on the contrary there have been countless professionals from a plethora of fields whom have stated their support of this.
Shukaido, this is almost exactly the same as the shit you've posted before. The same shit that has been debunked and disproved over and over again. We shouldn't have to waste OUR time disproving YOUR bullshit. WE have actually done research in to this. These "9/11 Truth" organizations are notorious for attracting conspirators and idiots.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;25133767]Who do you think those people are? [B]They have no political affiliations.[/B] These are just [B]scientists, military officials, and citizens [/B]with some common sense coming forward with their side of the story based on evidence they've gathered. How is that at all biased?[/QUOTE] And I piss rainbow sherbet and shit gold bullion aye? And what fucking evidence do actors have? what evidence does your average citizen have? "I heard that the government was planting mind control devices to make people believe 9/11 was turrerists OPEN YOUR EYES AMERICA!!" And really military personnel have no political affiliation? Fuck me you must be retarded. Also I highly suspect those scientists aren't exactly true to the method, it honestly sounds like they are looking for evidence to support their conclusion as opposed to drawing a conclusion from the evidence.
[QUOTE=bravehat;25133957]And I piss rainbow sherbet and shit gold bullion aye? And what fucking evidence do actors have? what evidence does your average citizen have? "I heard that the government was planting mind control devices to make people believe 9/11 was turrerists OPEN YOUR EYES AMERICA!!" And really military personnel have no political affiliation? Fuck me you must be retarded. Also I highly suspect those scientists aren't exactly true to the method, it honestly sounds like they are looking for evidence to support their conclusion as opposed to drawing a conclusion from the evidence.[/QUOTE] Exactly. Good points.
You can't call this science at all, especially when the people are looking for evidence to support a particular answer. If you don't have an objective mind then you're going to be able to find little details that support your side. [QUOTE=bravehat;25133957]Also I highly suspect those scientists aren't exactly true to the method, it honestly sounds like they are looking for evidence to support their conclusion as opposed to drawing a conclusion from the evidence.[/QUOTE] Beat me to it.
[QUOTE=Zeddy;25133917]Shukaido, this is almost exactly the same as the shit you've posted before. The same shit that has been debunked and disproved over and over again. We shouldn't have to waste OUR time disproving YOUR bullshit. WE have actually done research in to this. These "9/11 Truth" organizations are notorious for attracting conspirators and idiots.[/QUOTE] You're as foolish as you are ignorant. I don't respost shit, this is a brand new article with BRAND NEW SOURCES. Just because all of the organizations have to do with 9/11, doesn't mean they're all the same damn thing. :downswords: [editline]06:53PM[/editline] Also, I like how you guys are all [I][B]assuming[/B][/I] all of your critique about it. You have no idea what the scientists are doing, how they're doing it, and what conclusions they've come to. You just think you know what you're talking about after taking one glimpse at the article when in actuality you know less than [B]your inflated ego lets on you do.[/B] [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Trolling/flaming" - Hexxeh))[/highlight]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.