Personally I haven't even chosen yet, as I'm debating over digital or non digital. So what's your favorite? :smile:
Not entirely sure this needs its own thread, buuuuut hell why not.
For outdoors I'm partial to my Russian KLMK oversuit, but MARPAT works damn well down here in the South with our red clay.
Indoors, I'd go with my Ukrainian urban TTsKO
Personally I like Flecktarn for it's versatility, and it's cheap and easy to get so it's good for starting out with and easily replaceable if it gets damaged. But it really depends on what environment you're in.
Sorry this is the first time in years I've been on this website lol, anyway nice choice
+1 to Flecktarn. If you don't want digital but like MARPAT's colors, go with Flecktarn. Another great camo.
camo: choose what looks cool and works
The camo designs I'm debating right now:
6 color desert, tricolor desert design, MARPAT desert, TTsKO, VSR, Flora but not so sure whether to get an old design or digital
I like my M81. It might be common as fuck over in the US but in the world of pretty much nothing but DPM and multicam over here i can be a special snowflake.
And the first game i wore it for some guys didn't notice me untill they got within ~5 feet of where i was lying. I wasn't even in a bush or anything.
As much as I like the M81 woodland it wouldn't work so great in Southern California as there's not that much woodland.
I like AOR2
[QUOTE=StolenArc;45491460]As much as I like the M81 woodland it wouldn't work so great in Southern California as there's not that much woodland.[/QUOTE]
I have the opposite problem. I'd like some 6 color desert camo but in addition to it being quite difficult to get ahold of over here, it also doesn't work very well in english woodlands.
M81 and OG-107 because it's affordable and available.
Both work pretty well in the woods in my area, and I've had good luck with OG-107 fatigues + Mitchell helmet cover in bushy areas.
[QUOTE=StolenArc;45491460]As much as I like the M81 woodland it wouldn't work so great in Southern California as there's not that much woodland.[/QUOTE]
Then why are you considering TTsKO, VSR, and Flora? TTsKO I can kiiiiiiiinda see if it's the autumn/brown-dominant version, but VSR and Flora? You'd need to find one of the brown-dominant variants, but that's not going to be easy or cheap. I imagine Mountain Flora (yellow-dominant) might work well in arid climates like SoCal.
[editline]24th July 2014[/editline]
Some other options for you:
[img]http://zenphotos.net/file/Online/SVD/Camo/RussianCamoFenceReversedLABEL.JPG[/img]
dat gorka E
The Partizan M one is pretty sweet, too. I also wish TTsKO was easier to get.
@Malikyte
Thanks, I think I know what to get now :wink:, and thanks to everyone
I've had my M81 BDUs since I started airsoft, and it's actually become waaay less common than it was then, AOR1/MARPAT and multicam seem to have largely taken over
Where can I find the farthest jacket to the left in your pic Malikyte? That jacket is overflowing with kickass.
My fake US airforce ABUs. Got them from some asian country, ripoff manufacturing couldn't even get the colors or pattern right.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/Dxeod81.jpg[/IMG]
Pretty effective where I play though, lots of green and dead grey brush.
Aor2 is really effective and kicks night vision in the nuts. It's also just super sexy.
Not my picture(one of the dt6g3 guys) but fucking look at it...
[IMG]http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y282/dracomar/10004115745_05e73e960a_o_zpsb21b9704.jpg[/IMG]
unpopular opinion time: i think AOR 1+2 look like shit
In my opinion, AOR1 (the pattern itself) is rather 'nothing new to see here', but AOR2 is beautiful.
[QUOTE=ossumsauce;45493696]unpopular opinion time: i think AOR 1+2 look like shit[/QUOTE]
they haven't even released aor 3 yet wow baseless opinion much?
[QUOTE=ossumsauce;45493696]unpopular opinion time: i think AOR 1+2 look like shit[/QUOTE]
I think they're pretty generic and AOR1 is literally desert MARPAT but I wouldn't go as far as saying they look like shit because I like AOR2 despite it being generic floperator camo. I'd probably use it if I wabted to makeva NATO operator loadout.
[QUOTE=Taepodong-2;45496402]I think they're pretty generic and [B]AOR1 is literally desert MARPAT[/B] but I wouldn't go as far as saying they look like shit because I like AOR2 despite it being generic floperator camo. I'd probably use it if I wabted to makeva NATO operator loadout.[/QUOTE]
Wrong
The problem is that the GI Speshul (ed) is switching from Multicam to AOR2. There is an abundance of absolute shit AOR2 kits, with misfitting combat sets, bad pattern, and shoddy quality, owned by people who aren't the right proportions for the kit, who keep everything absolutely pristine looking, and they never put any neat fiddly bits on their kit.
For jungle operations, I'm all about Tiger Stripe, MARPAT, and M81.
For sandy or more urban operations, DCU and Multicam work excellently.
SOG teams used to do it in Vietnam/Laos. They'd equip the pointman with an AK so that if they came into contact and had to execute an IA drill, the fact that the VC would be taking AK instead of AR fire would hopefully add to the confusion and help them E&E.
I love flora. Don't know why but it looks so... cohesive I guess.
Only took my vegetato and flecktarn-D out once but they do look good.
AOR2 just seems to bright for my tastes
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.