The dude in the white t-shirt keeps trying to act smart but then completely forgets the very definition of wet
[quote]covered or saturated with water or another liquid.[/quote]
This shit is hilarious though.
[QUOTE=gbtygfvyg;52621041]The dude in the white t-shirt keeps trying to act smart but then completely forgets the very definition of wet[/QUOTE]
I know who you mean but
they're all wearing white t-shirts
i like how it jumpcuts and his shirt is off now
the argument got kicked up to a new level
It's not wet if the waters do touch
[QUOTE=Drury;52621076]I know who you mean but
they're all wearing white t-shirts[/QUOTE]
I kinda skipped through the video :v:
quick question
what's a fish?
[QUOTE=DiscoInferno;52621193]quick question
what's a fish?[/QUOTE]
This is a cut version of the video, the longer version answers that.
"If a creature lives in the water, it is considered to be a fish. If it lives out of the water, it is no longer a fish. It must be considered to be in the water for it to be considered to be a fish."
And that's when the other dude strips completely buck naked.
For the record: Fish, in water, ARE WET.
If fish aren't wet then what is fish?
Water is not wet
Do you get more wet by oil than water?
[QUOTE=skynrdfan3;52621241]For the record: Fish, in water, ARE WET.[/QUOTE]
Do you have evidence to back up that claim?
[QUOTE=Shakma;52621572]Do you get more wet by oil than water?[/QUOTE]
No, you get oily.
Is water wet?
"If you're surrounded by air, you're dry"
"If you're surrounded by water, you're not wet"
Stop
This is like the kind of conversation you'd hear the gang have in It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia.
[QUOTE=Talishmar;52621459]Water is not wet[/QUOTE]
Correct, water isn't wet until it's out of water.
[QUOTE=TreasoN.avi;52622567]Correct, water isn't wet until it's out of water.[/QUOTE]
Not even still. Objects covered or soaked in water are wet, but not water itself.
This got me thinking. I used to believe that fish are not wet, because the concept of wetness would be irrelevant in the case of them being underwater. By definition yes, they are submerged and thus covered by water, unless your definition of wetness is 'being covered by a -layer- of water'.
It becomes fairly straightforward in the situation that you drop your phone into water. You definitely would say that it's wet now.
is ice wet?
[QUOTE=Wii60;52620998][video]https://youtu.be/OWZ9urNKqXY[/video][/QUOTE]
This reminds me so much of something that happened in high school that me and my step brother bring up all the time.
Shit like this video happened daily, and one day a guy got way too mad. I think we were doing a rap fight and someone threw a roast his way he didn't like or something. We found out later from him that he was trying to start a fight after school, but he flubbed his line. He stood up and pointed at a guy and shouted "Hey! [I]Your[/I] dick, my [B]lips[/B], 3:00!"
We still don't know exactly what he was trying to say but he looked like had seen a ghost the moment it came out and even kids who weren't paying attention busted out laughing. :v:
Aren't humans and fish always wet though because our insides are always touching water.
[QUOTE=Jund;52622631]is ice wet?[/QUOTE]
It's not wet unless it's covered in liquid water, though it probably will be if you're handling it. You must be trying to be comical about how ice is water but whether ice is covered in water or not has a huge functional distinction. If icy ground is covered in liquid water you're multitudes more likely to slip, fall and die.
[QUOTE=duckmaster;52622639]Aren't humans and fish always wet though because our insides are always touching water.[/QUOTE]
Our insides are wet, but are you? Would you call a fruit wet because it contains liquid?
[QUOTE=Talishmar;52622719]It's not wet unless it's covered in liquid water, though it probably will be if you're handling it. You must be trying to be comical about how ice is water but whether ice is covered in water or not has a huge functional distinction. If icy ground is covered in liquid water you're multitudes more likely to slip, fall and die.
Our insides are wet, but are you? Would you call a fruit wet because it contains liquid?[/QUOTE]
If the juicy innards comprise more than 50% of the fruit then yes I would call it wet.
Who the fuck invited Jaden Smith into this conversation...
