[QUOTE=Lexico;18483708]developers sappin my command conquer![/QUOTE]
Agreed, this one is absolutely terrible. Also, I ran this on the highest settings (Ultra high) and the graphics pose little improvement, if not, are worse than those of Tiberium Wars.
[QUOTE=ilolled;18483538]I want my base building :sigh:[/QUOTE]
I want my cecent C&C game
[QUOTE=markg06;18484573]I want my cecent C&C game[/QUOTE]
"cecent"?
It looks so boring!
Wow. EA you fucked up now. Its visuals are the same besides from thelighting and the new creations look ugly As fuck, especially the crawler. Not gonna be buying this one.
They should just go back to how Tiberium Sun was (or C&C).
christ it looks like utter shit.
what have EA done, WHAT HAVE THEY DONE?
I still find Tiberian Sun the most fun in the whole Tiberium series :(.
I remember when I first played through it when I was whatever age below 10, I wanted to see a full-movie version of all the cut scenes, they looked so fascinating to me back then.
looks like shit. Tiberium Sun + Firestorm > all
Graphics, gameplay or any other aspect pertaining to visuals isn't the only negative thing either - the music rapes your ears.
And here I was planning to buy this. Guess I'll stick to other base-building RTS.
[img]http://screenshots.filesnetwork.com/27/others/ra1.jpeg[/img]
Lest we forget. *sniff*
C&C went downhill from RA2, and this doesn't look that great either.
[QUOTE=MendozaMan;18486317][img]http://screenshots.filesnetwork.com/27/others/ra1.jpeg[/img]
Lest we forget. *sniff*[/QUOTE]
And to think, if a game came out today with graphics like this, it would be thrown into the bargain bin almost instantly.
fuck you ea for shutting down westwood.
[QUOTE=Dr Nick;18486977]And to think, if a game came out today with graphics like this, it would be thrown into the bargain bin almost instantly.[/QUOTE]
Not really, lots of people still appreciate old-2d-looking stuff
[QUOTE=Xerios3;18487820]Not really, lots of people still appreciate old-2d-looking stuff[/QUOTE]
I have to agree, if the reviews for the game are good. the graphics don't matter that much to me. I'm not saying that i want a pong look alike but you know what i mean.
[QUOTE=Xerios3;18487820]Not really, lots of people still appreciate old-2d-looking stuff[/QUOTE]
Case in point braid and cortex command, also new super mario bros wii is technically 2D and old mixed with new.
Frogot to say : I WANT MY DAMN WALLS !
[QUOTE=MendozaMan;18486317]
Lest we forget. *sniff*[/QUOTE]
You can still go back and play it you know... sequels don't obliverate prequels in any way.
BUT i guess you could take the assumption that since adding an additional game in the series will displace the earliest installment by one backwards in release and so the newest installment would be causing the oldest one to actually be an incarnate of the former. This displacement would cause older installments to vanish in place for the newer installments, removing their popularity by an astonishing 104%. Imagine four prequels on the edge of a cliff. A sequel takes the place of the prequel farthest from the cliff, causing the last prequel in the chain to fall off into the creek. Popularity works in the same way!
C&C4 looks so unbelievably box
I wish they would make another Generals game.
i thought generals sucked :/
That looks retarded.
Also, I was really glad this didn't have anything to do with Twilight...god forbid.
[QUOTE=Soldier32;18489875]I saw Twilight and thought this was some parody video.[/QUOTE]
My thoughts exactly.
I saw the word Twilight and thought this was some parody video.
Reminds me of Emperor Battle for Dune.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
