[QUOTE=MightyLOLZOR;49680865]didn't he already upload this a while ago?[/QUOTE]
He did a "worst" list in January. This is for disappointments.
his argument for Rainbow 6 Siege is really dumb
who cares what a game is called? why did this game disappoint him? all the trailers and beta tests showed what the game would be and ubisoft never oversold or lied about the features of the game, he got a product as advertised and he liked it.
??????????????????????
[QUOTE=meppers;49681023]his argument for Rainbow 6 Siege is really dumb
who cares what a game is called? why did this game disappoint him? all the trailers and beta tests showed what the game would be and ubisoft never oversold or lied about the features of the game, he got a product as advertised and he liked it.
??????????????????????[/QUOTE]
The game doesn't play like Rainbow Six though. It's more like Counter-Strike.
[QUOTE=MightyLOLZOR;49681134]The game doesn't play like Rainbow Six though. It's more like Counter-Strike.[/QUOTE]
Rainbow six hasn't played like rainbow six for a while
[QUOTE=Novangel;49681182]Rainbow six hasn't played like rainbow six for a while[/QUOTE]
Yes, and that's a huge disappointment.
[QUOTE=meppers;49681023]his argument for Rainbow 6 Siege is really dumb
[/QUOTE]
To Joe any game with microtransactions that isn't free to play is irredeemable.
That's really what it comes down to.
[QUOTE=chunkymonkey;49681189]Yes, and that's a huge disappointment.[/QUOTE]
Still a lot more closer to the old R6 than Vegas
[QUOTE=Super Muffin;49681205]To Joe any game with microtransactions that isn't free to play is irredeemable.
That's really what it comes down to.[/QUOTE]
To be fair, while the game can still be good, if it costs $60 AND has microtransactions that is [I]shitty [/I]no matter how you slice it.
Wow I was not expecting to see Infinite Crisis there. That trailer it had was badass.
[QUOTE=TheFilmSlacker;49681281]122 hours clocked into Battlefront on PS4. It ain't that bad.
But the $70 season pass price is kinda disgusting.[/QUOTE]
Not to mention that upcoming maps are mostly preexisting planets and [I]two new planets/stations with one map for each game mode.[/I] Fuck that I'm waiting for the new planets, but by then the game will probably be dead.
The list is pretty solid imo.
[QUOTE=TheFilmSlacker;49681281]122 hours clocked into Battlefront on PS4. It ain't that bad.
But the $70 season pass price is kinda disgusting.[/QUOTE]
Battlefront is a decent shooter game if you had no expectations from it whatsoever.
For veteran fans of the Battlefront series, the game sucks massive cock in all aspects.
[QUOTE=NoobSauce;49681396]Battlefront is a decent shooter game if you had no expectations from it whatsoever.
For veteran fans of the Battlefront series, the game sucks massive cock in all aspects.[/QUOTE]
It's pretty much a Battlefield beta with a very convincing Star Wars skin and the Battlefront name plastered on.
[QUOTE=meppers;49681023]his argument for Rainbow 6 Siege is really dumb
who cares what a game is called? why did this game disappoint him? all the trailers and beta tests showed what the game would be and ubisoft never oversold or lied about the features of the game, he got a product as advertised and he liked it.
??????????????????????[/QUOTE]
When you put a brand name on a product people will expect the game to respect what the franchise is known for, meaning it won't differ too much from the previous titles and reaches the same standard of quality. If the game is too different, or not good enough, they get disappointed that a game officially part of a licence they like is too different or not good enough to live up to the name.
Have some examples of games people disliked because they were too different from the rest of the franchise (regardless of the game's actual quality) :
- Quake 4
- DmC Devil May Cry
- Doom 3
- Fallout 3
- Banjo & Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts
- Zelda 2
- Mario 2
- Castlevania 2
- Starfox Adventures
- XCOM Declassified
- Thief
- Hitman Absolution
[QUOTE=Keychain;49681307]Wow I was not expecting to see Infinite Crisis there. That trailer it had was badass.[/QUOTE]
The trailer was good, really didn't think it was going to be a moba though :v:
The only thing I don't agree with is the bizarre Rainbow Six tangent. Seemed really out of place and I think it's silly to call a game you like a disappointment over the nomenclature then swoon over a hypothetical singleplayer component that by all accounts was garbage. I've been playing Rainbow Six since the original and Siege is definitely a step in the right direction away from the Vegas games, which were [I]clearly [/I]influenced by the rise of casual console first and third person shooters that came with the PS3/360 launches. It's not an HD remake of Raven Shield but it's an extremely tactical game that rewards positioning and map knowledge as much or even more so than sheer reflexes and aim.
Props for bashing Battlefront though. It seems like a lot of youtubers are coincidentally glossing over it when it comes to looking back over the year.
Pretty sure Angry Joe is on the top 10 worst big game reviewers.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;49681571]The only thing I don't agree with is the bizarre Rainbow Six tangent. Seemed really out of place and I think it's silly to call a game you like a disappointment over the nomenclature then swoon over a hypothetical singleplayer component that by all accounts was garbage. I've been playing Rainbow Six since the original and Siege is definitely a step in the right direction away from the Vegas games, which were [I]clearly [/I]influenced by the rise of casual console first and third person shooters that came with the PS3/360 launches. It's not an HD remake of Raven Shield but it's an extremely tactical game that rewards positioning and map knowledge as much or even more so than sheer reflexes and aim.
Props for bashing Battlefront though. It seems like a lot of youtubers are coincidentally glossing over it when it comes to looking back over the year.[/QUOTE]
I can see it being Number 10, nothing more. It isn't a 'proper' Rainbow Six game but it's still good. There's [I]some[/I] disappointment to be had there, at least.
[QUOTE=Zephyrs;49681625]Pretty sure Angry Joe is on the top 10 worst big game reviewers.[/QUOTE]
The fact he's honest and consistent puts him surprisingly high on the list of good reviewers actually.
[QUOTE=Zephyrs;49681625]Pretty sure Angry Joe is on the top 10 worst big game reviewers.[/QUOTE]
Yea.. You can't really type a statement like that without suggesting a few "big game reviewers" worth subscribing to.
To my knowledge: Joe hasn't been blatently bought out and it's only slightly admirable.
[QUOTE=maddogsamurai;49681405]It's pretty much a Battlefield beta with a very convincing Star Wars skin and the Battlefront name plastered on.[/QUOTE]
I wish it were a battlefield reskin because then it would have depth. Other than a lot of players on the map and being a shooter it doesn't have much in common with battlefield.
Starwars battlefront deserved it. Even comparing it to other battlefield games at launch it was lacking. Not to mention lack of usable weapons and all of them using the same effect of sparks flying around. And that people could just camp the powerup spots so they could get the same one all the time.
Battlefront absolutely deserved every bit of disappointment it received. It's a $60 multiplayer only title that constantly shoves its $50 season pass in your face, which is not something to be proud of. It had arguably less content than fucking splatoon did at launch, and splatoon is constantly adding more content with free updates. FREE FUCKING UPDATES! Must be a form of witchcraft to EA considering they want you to pay for everything.
On top of that, let's do some math. Let's say you buy the game and it's season pass, about $110 not including tax. But wait! What if you bought the deluxe edition? Wasn't that $70-$80 ON TOP of the $50 season pass. That's roughly $120 and STILL not factoring taxes in. That's fucking 2 $60 games or 3 $40 games for the price EA is asking for. So for twice the price of a normal game, I get a game with a QUARTER of a game's content that I would struggle to play for more than 100 hours.
ORRRR I be smart, spend that $120 on 3 copies of Monster Hunter 4 Ultimate and entertain myself and friends for hundreds if not THOUSANDS of hours.
I feel really bad for the battlefront vets who bought this.
Anyone got a list?
[QUOTE=DMGaina;49686076]Anyone got a list?[/QUOTE]
you could watch the video you know
[QUOTE=DMGaina;49686076]Anyone got a list?[/QUOTE]
10) Assassin's Creed Syndicate
9) Need for Speed
8) Beyond Earth Rising Tide
7) Heroes of Might & Magic VII
6) Batman Arkham Knight
5) Halo 5
4) Rainbow Six Siege*
3) Mad Max
2) Infinite Crisis
1) Star Wars Battlefront
He said he liked playing Rainbow Six Siege just didn't think it lived up to the Rainbow Six name
[QUOTE=maddogsamurai;49681390]Not to mention that upcoming maps are mostly preexisting planets and [I]two new planets/stations with one map for each game mode.[/I] Fuck that I'm waiting for the new planets, but by then the game will probably be dead.
The list is pretty solid imo.[/QUOTE]
they should revamp battlefront 2, like new graphics, physics. That would be fucking awesome, cause then we can play battlefront 2 again.
Speaking of Star Wars Battlefront EA, I don't know why people keep complaining about people comparing it to the origional two games. EA could've easily called it Star Wars:Frontlines or something like that
[QUOTE=RedBaronFlyer;49686794]Speaking of Star Wars Battlefront EA, I don't know why people keep complaining about people comparing it to the origional two games. EA could've easily called it Star Wars:Frontlines or something like that[/QUOTE]
They honestly should have. THEY made the decision to call it Battlefront trying to cash in on nostalgia so WE are holding them to the standard THEY set.
Not our fault they fell miles short.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
