Ten FTW: Top Ten Gaming Engines - General

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYJ0zl6jbLM&feature=feedu[/media][URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYJ0zl6jbLM&feature=feedu"][/URL] I think most of you guys will be delighted to know which one is at the top.

IW engine is shit So is gamebryo :|

My guess is that by "Top 10 Gaming Engines" they mean Top 10 Most Used Gaming Engines.

These guys aren't funny.

need hd version of this video and source is.. loading zone please wait...

Source isn't the most advanced engine, it's the most used. That's because of all the players on CSS, TF2, GMOD and a hell of a lot of other games put together. Source has fucking galactic loading times.

[QUOTE=KlaseR;31534989]Source isn't the most advanced engine, it's the most used. That's because of all the players on CSS, TF2, GMOD and a hell of a lot of other games put together. Source has fucking galactic loading times.[/QUOTE] Source is Christmas tree lights tangled up AKA it's better to buy a new one that fix the old one

Wow what the fuck, Gamebryo?

I for one actually like the Gamebryo engine.

"While you play your battlefield 3, I'm going to be playing on my IW engine! TROLL LOL FLAME WAR XDDD!!!!!"

These guys are terrible, calling out these so-call "nerds." What's worse is that they are probably 40 year old virgins reading off a script.

Frostbite should've been way higher up. BC1 and 2 were amazing for their time. Especially when it comes to sound interferance. And they should've gone with some other engine instead of the IW one. Like Visceral engine. Dead space 2 was so fluid you barely ever noticed what was a cutscene and what wasn't. Dante's Inferno was pretty shit however.

Source? The best engine? I think everybody who has ever worked on Source, besides Valve has had serious distaste in it.

[QUOTE=Binladen34;31535684]Source? The best engine? I think everybody who has ever worked on Source, besides Valve has had serious distaste in it.[/QUOTE] Even though I wouldn't have put it on #1. The source engine really is very versatile

Could anybody help me? I try looking at this video, and when I try to look at it trought facepunch the screen goes green and when I click on the video my internet crashes, what do I need to do to make it work again?(I tryied watching other videos on other sites and the same thing happened)

[QUOTE=Marbalo;31535360]I dont care what your opinion is on MW2, but I think IW is a fantastic, solid engine.[/QUOTE] I agree, it's very lightweight and it looks very nice, I don't see many other games that look that great running at a solid 60 frames per second on the xbox 360 or PS3 nowadays. examples [quote][img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/542894270622535829/B655DC056E3096A5AFABA521667D412B999A5B54/[/img] [img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/542894270605285226/08DAAA34895494632F56F64EA312E6EE615921F6/[/img][/quote]

[QUOTE=KlaseR;31534989]Source isn't the most advanced engine, it's the most used. That's because of all the players on CSS, TF2, GMOD and a hell of a lot of other games put together. Source has fucking galactic loading times.[/QUOTE] I get like, half a second loading times in source games

Just childish stuff for young gamers. No need to get your panties in a twist it's just not aimed at a lot of people here.

[quote]The Gamebryo engine is written in C++, which, in nerd speak, is translated roughly to games with gay school kids and nuclear wastelands[/quote] ALL OF MY RAGE.

Those two faggots were funny the first 5 times and now are just [B]EXACTLY[/B] the same every episode, no knowledge or ocnsideration anywhere, they jsut shit 10 thinks they thought about into random order and yea.

Gamebryo is such a fucking bad engine, I'm glad Skyrim won't be using it.

Werent all of uncharted 2 cutscenes pre rendered? Anyways the crysis engine should have been way higher considering its currently one of the best looking engines.

how do you rate a game engine without using it?

Gamebryo is quite amazing actually. I have never seen a game where you can pick up every single tin cans in a game.

Yeah, source is an okay engine but it doesn't deserve the top spot, Frostbite 2 should be higher as battlefield 3 looks amazing in even in alpha.

Am I the only one who thinks that Frostbite 2 has had the most work put into it? [editline]yes[/editline] Cobra, are you a massive Call of Duty Franchise fan by any chance?

[QUOTE=Apache249;31536986]Am I the only one who thinks that Frostbite 2 has had the most work put into it?[/QUOTE] That's because DICE gives the players something new for every (major) BF game. Unlike IW, which is pretty much the same rehashed shit every year.

The source engine was amazing when it came out (just look at half-life 2 and other games that came out the same year) but lately its been feeling a little outdated. Portal 2s textures weren't that detailed and there doesn't seem to be that big of a difference between source 1 and source 2.

[QUOTE=imasillypiggy;31537351]The source engine was amazing when it came out (just look at half-life 2 and other games that came out the same year) but lately its been feeling a little outdated. Portal 2s textures weren't that detailed and there doesn't seem to be that big of a difference between source 1 and source 2.[/QUOTE] But if put in the right hands it can become pretty beautiful [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3bPjEbenew&feature=BFa&list=UUzEweHcTo8xM&index=3[/media]

Stopped at gamebryo. Yea no.