[QUOTE=MissingGlitch;50905112]Someone seems stumped.[/QUOTE]
says who
[QUOTE=Otterman;50905121][img]http://i.imgur.com/fdbCpTW.png[/img]
:godzing:[/QUOTE]
Isn't CNN owned by Hilary?
[QUOTE=minilandstan;50906585]Isn't CNN owned by Hilary?[/QUOTE]
Doesn't make it less true that he is losing in polls.
[QUOTE=minilandstan;50906585]Isn't CNN owned by Hilary?[/QUOTE]
what?
where the hell did this accusation come from
This is going to become a meme, isn't it?
[QUOTE=markfu;50906843]This is going to become a meme, isn't it?[/QUOTE]
Says who
[QUOTE=minilandstan;50906585]Isn't CNN owned by Hilary?[/QUOTE]
you know the whole clinton news network thing is a joke right
[QUOTE=cdr248;50907449]you know the whole clinton news network thing is a joke right[/QUOTE]
Says who.
(so I don't get banned for memeshit):
This really is indicative of the Trump campaign. It's all about denying basic facts, no matter how dumb it makes you look. I fucking love how the interviewer is just speechless at how dumb this guy sounds.
I wonder if he took the speechlessness of the news anchor as "winning."
[t]http://i.imgur.com/1R9Z9Og.png[/t]
the face of morbid depression
Ok apparently he did think he got her.
[url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-aide-on-awkward-exchange-with-cnn-anchor-i-think-i-unraveled-her-233522443.html[/url]
[editline]18th August 2016[/editline]
I mean arguably he did, but not in a way that puts him in a good light.
[QUOTE=markfu;50908329]Ok apparently he did think he got her.
[url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-aide-on-awkward-exchange-with-cnn-anchor-i-think-i-unraveled-her-233522443.html[/url][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]“I was shocked at the length of the silence as she stumbled to think of an answer,” Cohen said. “And when she did come up with an answer, it was so generic it could have applied to anything.”[/QUOTE]
thats funny because that's exactly what you could say about your statement, it was so absurdly vague and stupid that no one could reasonably come up with an answer ya cunt
Although if she had named those polls it would have given him more ammunition to try to use Trump's liberal bias schtick since:
[quote]I completely disagree with the polling information[/quote]
Then again that brings back up the point of why he would devolve the discussion into "says who" if he wouldn't even care about who said it in the first place.
[editline]18th August 2016[/editline]
I guess maybe if she used the Breitbart poll, maybe.
[quote]“I was shocked at the length of the silence as she stumbled to think of an answer,” Cohen said.[/quote]
That's called being stunned at your stupidity
[editline]18th August 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=markfu;50908353]Although if she had named those polls it would have given him more ammunition to try to use Trump's liberal bias schtick since:
Then again that brings back up the point of why he would devolve the discussion into "says who" if he wouldn't even care about who said it in the first place.
[editline]18th August 2016[/editline]
I guess maybe if she used the Breitbart poll, maybe.[/QUOTE]
Even the Breitbart poll had Trump losing. When she said "all of them" she wasn't wrong.
He probably tried really hard not to tear up.
I have some friends who think the same way, [url=http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/11/opinion/campaign-stops/how-many-people-support-trump-but-dont-want-to-admit-it.html]believing that people support him, but refuse to speak out[/url], that polls are tweaked because [url=http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll-reutersipsos-idUSKCN10910T]having the "neither" option takes away votes from Trump[/url], and [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shy_Tory_Factor]believing his turnout on election day will be larger than polls predict[/url].
Talk about moment of Zen.
I laughed out loud when she said "all of them" the second time. What is this election.
[QUOTE=markfu;50908329]Ok apparently he did think he got her.
[url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-aide-on-awkward-exchange-with-cnn-anchor-i-think-i-unraveled-her-233522443.html[/url]
[editline]18th August 2016[/editline]
I mean arguably he did, but not in a way that puts him in a good light.[/QUOTE]
he got her with a remarkably stupid empty comment that's about as good as saying, "i can't hear what you're saying lalalala"
normally people would offer an actual retort like "those sources are known for being biased/whatever", not "says who?"
I thought I accidentally paused the video. That was a long pause.
[QUOTE=Splarg!;50908862]What is this election.[/QUOTE]
you guys have fun with that
that's what jokes are for, yeah?
[QUOTE=comet1337;50909367]you guys have fun with that
that's what jokes are for, yeah?[/QUOTE]
its the joke that was taken too far
[QUOTE=Streecer;50906750]what?
where the hell did this accusation come from[/QUOTE]
It's not like it's necessarily proof of bias but they say that because Time Warner, owner of CNN, is one of Hillary Clinton's largest contributors.
I think Trump is losing on purpose. He's friends with the Clintons behind the scenes, and he knows this joke has gone too far.
[t]http://i.imgur.com/5AeAozZ.png[/t]
pfffffff
you can't disagree with something that is actually factual. if a majority group votes for one person over another, you can't just say "i don't think that's actually the case" unless you want to make the ballsy claim that the fucking [I]polls are actually counted wrong.[/I] and if that's the claim the trump team wants to stick with, goooood fucking luck.
this guy is perfect for trump in every way. that was so fucking awkward.
yeah well you know if the opposite party that's interrogating you can't come up with a proper response that means you win by default :^)