• Donald Trump is President and there is nothing you can do about it| Naked Ape
    72 replies, posted
[media]https://youtu.be/oHowVDPEgRE[/media] Starring Keith Olbermann and the Resistance. Actually some good points on the Russian hack brought up too.
Whew, that title.
[URL="http://i.imgur.com/2tYRjtm.png"]What a reasonable, level minded, unbiased individual.[/URL] I watched 50 seconds of it. Had to stop at the justifications of the DNC hackings because "oh it exposed how 'corrupt' clinton was."
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;51576780][URL="http://i.imgur.com/2tYRjtm.png"]What a reasonable, level minded, unbiased individual.[/URL] I watched 50 seconds of it. Had to stop at the justifications of the DNC hackings because "oh it exposed how 'corrupt' clinton was."[/QUOTE] I think he knows what he is doing and announces his bias pretty well. The best part is that he has a better like to dislike ratio than Keith Olbermann too. So maybe people actually resonate with his opinions.
It doesn't even matter what side this comes from, it's just extremely annoying and excessive by the title alone. That and I just can't sit through the voice.
[QUOTE=Tudd;51576785]The best part is that he has a better like to dislike ratio than Keith Olbermann too.[/QUOTE] That's because Keith Olbermann is actually well known
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;51576793]That's because Keith Olbermann is actually well known[/QUOTE] Just not really well liked I guess.
[QUOTE=Primigenes;51576796]Giving a shit about the like to dislike ratio on a youtube video is the same as giving a shit about ratings on FP. Especially when morons can throw a fucking brigade on videos they don't like[/QUOTE] I've seen some people care about the like/dislike ration quite abit here on FP actually. I personally don't really care. If I actually cared about ratings I would of forced myself to change my opinion instead of receiving boxes for days.
I like how people keep saying "get over it" "nothing you can do now" When those same people have been trying every trick in the book to try and get Obama out of office. Like it's Obama's last month as president and people are still trying to prove that his birth certificate is fake.
Even from someone who slightly sides with Trump more than Clinton, this was kind of in poor taste. Especially make a mockery of wanting to pursue foreign governments intervening in the election. Just because WikiLeaks were informative doesn't mean they weren't bad. Not understanding the full story just because Trump is president is just disingenuous and sets a terrible precedent. I would say the same thing if the hackings were in favor of Clinton.
Let's pretend for a moment that youtube votes matter. [QUOTE=Tudd;51576785]The best part is that he has a better like to dislike ratio than Keith Olbermann too. So maybe people actually resonate with his opinions.[/QUOTE] I thought this was discussed in another thread. Keith Olbermann was brigaded that day and you fucking know it. [t]http://i.imgur.com/GTFpP51.png[/t][t]http://i.imgur.com/7jE2jZx.png[/t] [t]http://i.imgur.com/5Y8Aiwb.png[/t][t]http://i.imgur.com/sa11Hvn.png[/t] I'm subscribed to Keith Olbermann. I can say that the December 14 and 19th video didn't have that many downvotes, and I can say for all of them that their downvotes are very unusual. His latest video, alongside a random video from the month of december for comparison of the 4 videos above. [t]http://i.imgur.com/szst3TE.png[/t][t]http://i.imgur.com/WnxSJZU.png[/t]
[QUOTE=Tudd;51576802]I've seen some people care about the like/dislike ration quite abit here on FP actually. I personally don't really care. If I actually cared about ratings I would of forced myself to change my opinion instead of receiving boxes for days.[/QUOTE] You don't really care and yet you're the one that tried to use the like to dislike ratio to prove a point.
[QUOTE=Anderan;51576841]You don't really care and yet you're the one that tried to use the like to dislike ratio to prove a point.[/QUOTE] I think other people care more as what a previous post might indicate. [editline]24th December 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;51576826]Let's pretend for a moment that youtube votes matter. I thought this was discussed in another thread. Keith Olbermann was brigaded that day and you fucking know it. [t]http://i.imgur.com/GTFpP51.png[/t][t]http://i.imgur.com/7jE2jZx.png[/t] [t]http://i.imgur.com/5Y8Aiwb.png[/t][t]http://i.imgur.com/sa11Hvn.png[/t] I'm subscribed to Keith Olbermann. I can say that the December 14 and 19th video didn't have that many downvotes, and I can say for all of them that their downvotes are very unusual. His latest video, alongside a random video from the month of december for comparison of the 4 videos above. [t]http://i.imgur.com/szst3TE.png[/t][t]http://i.imgur.com/WnxSJZU.png[/t][/QUOTE] I actually didn't "fucking know it", considering I didn't even know his like/dislike situation till you brought it up in one of the threads. But considering his ratings on FP "dropped"/gained more boxes over time the more videos he put out, maybe people just actually are starting to not like him. He is pulling in 50%+ so maybe there is still some hope for him.
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;51576826] I'm subscribed to Keith Olbermann. [/QUOTE] Ew why.
[QUOTE=AaronM202;51576859]Ew why.[/QUOTE] Before the election he was actually putting out some good videos, after he's went kinda overboard, but I still enjoy them enough to watch them.
Will the standard M.O. of the Trump crowd ever cease to be ignoring all valid criticism of Trump by diverting attention to mean old Hillary? He is every bit the snake that she is, and then some. Furthermore, Hillary Clinton in general becomes less and less relevant with every passing day. When the 2020 election cycle rolls around, are ya'll [B]still[/B] going to be trying to defend Trump by lambasting Clinton? As far as the Russian hack stuff goes, calling what was shown "the truth" is also a hell of a reach. It was perpetrated by a hostile nation's government specifically to weaken and divide us for the purposes of getting a seventy year old toddler into office. Both political camps were hacked, but only one side's dirt was leaked, and the "truth" of those leaks are largely open to interpretation (and thus misinterpretation). See: Pizzagate. They may have given some solid evidence that the DNC was involved in some fairly manipulative or duplicitous shit, but it sure as hell didn't vindicate Trump or the GOP, so this argument that Trump is somehow in our best interests because he kept out Crooked Hillary and the Dirty DNC doesn't make much sense-- especially when coming from some shrill college kid's youtube channel and backed up by pictures of Hillary Clinton photoshopped to make her look demonic. There may be a serious cracks in our democracy, which I hope get filled, but to act as if the GOP isn't every bit as complicit in these dirty games is pretty naive in my opinion.
[QUOTE=AaronM202;51576859]Ew why.[/QUOTE] If it makes him feel any better, I would too if I didn't have to receive a notification for every video GQ puts out. I just have to know what the Resistance is up to. [editline]24th December 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=Big Dumb American;51576864]Will the standard M.O. of the Trump crowd ever cease to be ignoring all valid criticism of Trump by diverting attention to mean old Hillary? He is every bit the snake that she is, and then some. Hillary being two-faced does not validate Trump. As far as the Russian hack stuff goes, calling what was shown "the truth" is also a hell of a reach. It was perpetrated by a hostile nation's government specifically to weaken and divide us for the purposes of getting a seventy year old toddler into office. Both camps were hacked, only one was released, and the "truth" of those leaks are largely open to interpretation (and thus misinterpretation). They may have given some solid evidence that the DNC was involved in some fairly manipulative or duplicitous shit, but it sure as hell didn't vindicate Trump or the GOP, so this argument that Trump is somehow in our best interests doesn't make much sense-- especially when coming from some shrill college kid's youtube channel and backed up by pictures of Hillary Clinton photoshopped to make her look demonic lol.[/QUOTE] Valid points. Though I would say that this election was a comparison of who is worse and less about policy. Which I thought was unfortunate, but alot of arguments of defending Hillary's faults was pointing out Trumps. I think you said it yourself that though, the hacks did reveal factual information, and it is up to people to determine what is worthy to them voting wise and their perception of the DNC/Hillary. And to be fair on the obvious mocking photoshop; the real still wasn't much better. [t]http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/hillary-death-575x301.jpg[/t]
Old woman has unflattering photo taken: proof of her corruption??? You tell me! perhaps these dancing pictures of dumb monkeys next to her face will change ur mind
[QUOTE=Tudd;51576870]And to be fair on the obvious mocking photoshop; the real still wasn't much better. [t]http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/hillary-death-575x301.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] So it's kind of like how biased journalists use this unflattering image of Trump when they could chose quite a lot of decent ones. [t]http://i.imgur.com/PtgpwcM.png[/t]
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;51576902]So it's kind of like how biased journalists use this unflattering image of Trump when they could chose quite a lot of decent ones. [t]http://i.imgur.com/PtgpwcM.png[/t][/QUOTE] I think some people actually like that image though.
[QUOTE=Tudd;51576906]I think some people actually like that image though.[/QUOTE] Plenty of people also bitched incessantly about how this was unflattering so, take your pick I guess
Maybe those "2nd amendment people" could "do something about it". :quotes:
[QUOTE=Tudd;51576785]I think he knows what he is doing and announces his bias pretty well. The best part is that he has a better like to dislike ratio than Keith Olbermann too. So maybe people actually resonate with his opinions.[/QUOTE] Are you trying to use youtube likes on a video with 20k views to claim what the entire american people 'resonates' with? That's nuts.
[QUOTE=Funktastic Dog;51576945]Are you trying to use youtube likes on a video with 20k views to claim what the entire american people 'resonates' with? That's nuts.[/QUOTE] Hey there, just his audience is resonating pretty hard for him. It ain't like Keith Olbermann where you can't tell if his audience/GQ is slowly turning 50/50 or being brigaded.
[QUOTE=Tudd;51576870]And to be fair on the obvious mocking photoshop; the real still wasn't much better. [t]http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/hillary-death-575x301.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] Real still? It's an obviously edited image from a speech. Here's the worst real picture I could find from that same speech. [t]http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/24c3ff152e77fe51554ab4288e895f68[/t] Regardless, she's a 70 year old woman not wearing makeup. Trump is caked with makeup for that very same reason, 70 year olds are [b]old[/b], and unless you're covered in plastic surgery you're going to look it.
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;51576902]So it's kind of like how biased journalists use this unflattering image of Trump when they could chose quite a lot of decent ones. [t]http://i.imgur.com/PtgpwcM.png[/t][/QUOTE] that picture is hilarious though. the only hilarious picture of hillary is her face at the dnc when the balloons fell and i thought she shit her pants. [t]https://i.ytimg.com/vi/od4Zby8HLnA/maxresdefault.jpg[/t]
intellectual honesty isn't something that is very common anymore. the 2016 election proved that.
I don't understand what fantasy world Trump supporters came from where they thought everyone was just going to stop complaining about Trump because he won. [QUOTE=Tudd;51576961]Hey there, just his audience is resonating pretty hard for him. It ain't like Keith Olbermann where you can't tell if his audience/GQ is slowly turning 50/50 or being brigaded.[/QUOTE] I think the fact that both the clickbait garbage you post and the Resistance posts get walled in by boxes shows that nobody appreciates being yelled at over HTML5. It's certainly not my bag but I can certainly appreciate the fact that Olbermann puts in a little bit of effort into the production rather than just stream of consciousness prattling on for nine minutes. I did bother watching and just like the last time someone posted one of these; favorite part is where he just outright repeats a bullshit headline about Clinton, in a video where he accuses the media of not doing their job. Second favorite part was when some kid whos high mark in life is hitting 85k youtube subscribers calling John McCain a cuck.
Well, someone could assassinate him. But then Pence would be president
[QUOTE=Tudd;51576785]I think he knows what he is doing and announces his bias pretty well. The best part is that he has a better like to dislike ratio than Keith Olbermann too. So maybe people actually resonate with his opinions.[/QUOTE] He shows his bias and how much of a non intellectual he is on his Twitter pretty well The kid seems dumb as fuck
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.