[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u735wbkvmhs[/media]
This shit has gone too far.
lmao so fake
obv. haxer i report to admin to ban u
lmao who still plays mw3???
[QUOTE=Agoat;40635776]lmao who still plays mw3???[/QUOTE]
Well the video was originally posted in march of 2012.
[QUOTE=Agoat;40635776]lmao who still plays mw3???[/QUOTE]
actually thats mw2
[QUOTE=Judas;40635839]actually thats mw2[/QUOTE]
Could be cod 4, 5 6 7 or 8
hell i don't even know how many copy's they made, err i mean sequels.
[QUOTE=Djessey;40635879]Could be cod 4, 5 6 7 or 8
hell i don't even know how many copy's they made, err i mean sequels.[/QUOTE]No, it's mw2, you can tell from the hud.
[QUOTE=Djessey;40635879]Could be cod 4, 5 6 7 or 8
hell i don't even know how many copy's they made, err i mean sequels.[/QUOTE]
Yeah man, it's almost as if they try to create some sort of brand recognition so they can make continued profits off their franchise that entertains millions of people.
so pro
[QUOTE=whazat!!!;40635923]Yeah man, it's almost as if they try to create some sort of brand recognition so they can make continued profits off their franchise that entertains millions of people.[/QUOTE]
Yeah man, it's totally not an excuse to charge you for the same game as many times as they want.
[quote]
[IMG]http://image.gamespotcdn.net/gamespot/images/box/9/9/8/938998_89079_front.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6d/Madden_NFL_09_Coverart.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www2.picturepush.com/photo/a/1931100/img/Madden-NFL-10-Custom-Covers/Madden-NFL-10-360-Asante-Samuel.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.gameinformer.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer-Blogs-Components-WeblogFiles/00-00-00-00-06/2705.11-madden-jared-allen.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/bc/Madden_12_official_cover.jpg/250px-Madden_12_official_cover.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a1/Madden_NFL_13_cover.png/220px-Madden_NFL_13_cover.png[/IMG][/quote]
[QUOTE=ghosevil;40636752]Yeah man, it's totally not an excuse to charge you for the same game as many times as they want.[/QUOTE]
yeah that is definitely not the madden 11 cover
Fake. He invited the chair and controller into a private match.
Like how he spins the chair then spins in-game, he was most likely looking at the screen already when he began to spin in-game.
Also quick scoping has ruined call of duty for me.
[QUOTE=whazat!!!;40635923]Yeah man, it's almost as if they try to create some sort of brand recognition so they can make continued profits off their franchise that entertains millions of people.[/QUOTE]
Team Fortress 2
Bioshock Infinite
The Bureau: X-Com Declassified
[QUOTE=whazat!!!;40635923]Yeah man, it's almost as if they try to create some sort of brand recognition so they can make continued profits off their franchise that entertains millions of people.[/QUOTE]
Yeah you're right, Good thing we have such an amazing company to show everyone that you don't need to be innovative, just repackage the same old shit!
I'm not saying what they're doing is ethically right, just financially right. Activision has discovered the power and earnings that comes with a huge brand-name like that.
While I think other companies make better games spending more time releasing post patches and spending 3-4 years working on extensive feature upgrades for a new title, calling Call of Duty a 'repackaged' game just because Activision has saturated it to the point of self-parody is a gross exaggeration, especially if you've spent time with the series.
And I think IW and Treyarch do attempt more than just a paint job, but it's results are lost on anyone who opposes the franchise because the changes are so minute and so frequent. Is it a proper way to build a good franchise? Of course not, Activision tried this shit before with Tony Hawk and Guitar Hero. But I can at least understand where they are coming from because it's the biggest franchise in gaming history at the moment and I can understand why they wouldn't want to give that up or deviate from the formula.
[QUOTE=ghosevil;40636752]Yeah man, it's totally not an excuse to charge you for the same game as many times as they want.[/QUOTE]
I never got this
Are you asking them to change the very mechanics of football or what because that would kind of defeat the purpose of the game
[QUOTE=evilweazel;40643122]I never got this
Are you asking them to change the very mechanics of football or what because that would kind of defeat the purpose of the game[/QUOTE]
Selling DLC vs Selling the same game and passing it off as something worthy of the standard commercial price-tag.
In the case of Madden? What changes besides updated teams/rosters and maybe the way they render a few pixels of grass.
In the case of CoD? What changes.
[QUOTE=ghosevil;40644475]Selling DLC vs Selling the same game and passing it off as something worthy of the standard commercial price-tag.
In the case of Madden? What changes besides updated teams/rosters and maybe the way they render a few pixels of grass.
In the case of CoD? What changes.[/QUOTE]
Maps, weapons, the campaign, improved visuals
[QUOTE=Durrsly;40644616]Maps, weapons, the campaign, improved visuals[/QUOTE]
Visuals haven't really changed too notably since Black Ops or so, and all the other stuff could easily be made into DLC.
[editline]14th May 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=evilweazel;40643122]I never got this
Are you asking them to change the very mechanics of football or what because that would kind of defeat the purpose of the game[/QUOTE]
They're releasing essentially the same game every year even though they only really need to every three years or so. I'd say the same goes for CoD.
[QUOTE=FDiz;40646486][IMG]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/14208311/936745_10151576798429798_75314240_n.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
It's hilarious how well those match up
like they all collab'd to try and make similar cover art
why did this turn into a debate about the call of duties being different
No wubwubs. Not a real MLG video, sorry this was rejected
Ok so I get it that this video shouldn't be taken seriously, but when he jumps off and starts to spin around in his chair, he doesn't actually spin his character around until he's like, 75% done spinning his chair and can simply turn his head the rest of the way to see the screen.
Too deep?
[QUOTE=whazat!!!;40642917]I'm not saying what they're doing is ethically right, just financially right. Activision has discovered the power and earnings that comes with a huge brand-name like that.
While I think other companies make better games spending more time releasing post patches and spending 3-4 years working on extensive feature upgrades for a new title, calling Call of Duty a 'repackaged' game just because Activision has saturated it to the point of self-parody is a gross exaggeration, especially if you've spent time with the series.
And I think IW and Treyarch do attempt more than just a paint job, but it's results are lost on anyone who opposes the franchise because the changes are so minute and so frequent. Is it a proper way to build a good franchise? Of course not, Activision tried this shit before with Tony Hawk and Guitar Hero. But I can at least understand where they are coming from because it's the biggest franchise in gaming history at the moment and I can understand why they wouldn't want to give that up or deviate from the formula.[/QUOTE]
There's a pretty big difference between Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, Call of Duty: World At War, Black Ops and Black Ops 2 anyway.
What? They keep the same gameplay premise, but isn't that the point? I guess I can agree that too little has changed from MW2 in 2007 and Black Ops 2 in 2012, but still.
Didn't take into account the wire on his mic, no flip occurred. Go break your disk scrub.
[QUOTE=Judas;40635839]actually thats mw2[/QUOTE]
oh shit that game is tight
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
