[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECE77Imki9M[/media]
Silly Fox News
Faux Noise
I like how his title is "Atheist"
"CAUSE YOU GUYS CANT TELL US HOW EVERYTHING GOT HERE"
Neither can you, unless you're lying. Ugh I hate fox news.
"Fascism!?"
People say he's too militant an atheist but the more things I watch with Richard Dawkins, the more I like him.
His smile cracks me up. Bill sounds like a real cunt in this video.
Richard Dawkins has a voice just like Dr. Kleiner, and a smile like the smug face. :smug:
Fucking Christ... Faux News, Jesus. I'll spare a rant on how Bill-O the clown shouldn't have been able to get Dawkins on his program, but I'm not sure why he agreed to go on in the first place.
Also, anyone notice the hatchet-job editing? That last statement form Dawkins had absolutely no context.
[QUOTE=Lithe;17768440]Also, anyone notice the hatchet-job editing? That last statement form Dawkins had absolutely no context.[/QUOTE]
He seems to do that a lot for some reason.
Typical Fox News insult, don't agree with someone? Call them a fascist! (Obama is Hitler, Khmer Rouge, or Stalin)
Man Bill O'Reilly is retarded.
[QUOTE=Lithe;17768440]Also, anyone notice the hatchet-job editing? That last statement form Dawkins had absolutely no context.[/QUOTE]
What? No editing. He was given a final word, so he decided to [I]once again[/I] say how its just more logical to trust in science than nothing. That was completely in context. Obviously too difficult for poor, simple little Bill though. Nonetheless he made his point.
He must be so fucking sick of repeating himself. I bet if he wasn't such a calm guy, he would've throttled at least one interviewer by now.
:foxnews:
Maybe Dawkins could have, as a Oxford biologist with all the qualifications that brings, have provided a succinct, logical answer that completely obliterated Bill-o's ludicrous assertions but hey, I'm just guessing.
It seems like hatchet-job editing to me because why would he simply restate his point? There are far better things he could have done with his final word. If what you say is true, could he be going easy on Bill?
[QUOTE=TAU!;17768331]His smile cracks me up. Bill sounds like a real cunt in this video.[/QUOTE]
[i]This[/i] video?
[QUOTE=DPennington;17768710][i]This[/i] video?[/QUOTE]
And many others.
[QUOTE=Lithe;17768707]
It seems like hatchet-job editing to me because why would he simply restate his point? There are far better things he could have done with his final word. If what you say is true, could he be going easy on Bill?[/QUOTE]
I understood why you said that, but you can imagine he's just trying to get his point across the simplist way possible, but even that just flew by Bill. He's a devoted teacher.
I actually watched this episode because it had Richard in it and wanted to see how Bill reacted.
Thanks for the avatar guyz
Sure thing.
:smug:
[QUOTE=TH89;17768921]Thanks for the avatar guyz[/QUOTE]
I love it
[QUOTE=TH89;17768921]Thanks for the avatar guyz[/QUOTE]
No Problem
oh hello
I like where this is going
Damn Bill is a retard.
I mean [I]fuck.[/I]
[QUOTE=AwpersAreBad;17768552]Typical Fox News insult, don't agree with someone? Call them a fascist! (Obama is Hitler, Khmer Rouge, or Stalin)[/QUOTE]
I absolutely hate this... The worst part is, I hear this all the time.
Hmmm... Dawkins or Nobel...
Awesome. I've got to get myself a Dawkins avatar. Heh, he's too good for Bill-o's show.
And I can imagine that, but perhaps it's my perception of 'why would he bother'? He's been on before, he knows what an idiot Bill is. Dawkins is a stalwart didact and intellectual, as well as an altogether excellent purveyor of knowledge, he's on a different tier entirely form the likes of Bill O'Reilly and Rupert Murdoch. Though I will agree that under the circumstances he is remarkably patient. I'd be sure as shit pissed. I think it's precisely this kind of thinking presented by Bill that is the reason why Atheists are viewed as so strident. What else is an appropriate reaction?
Holy shit I want to punch O'reilly in the head
My Avatar is now awesome
:chef:
what a dick.
I can't say I expect anything else from someone who willingly works for Fox News.
[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;17768296]"Fascism!?"
People say he's too militant an atheist but the more things I watch with Richard Dawkins, the more I like him.[/QUOTE]
I wouldn't call him militant, per se, he just doesn't really try to not hurt people's feelings.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.