I like how he talks about the evolution of FPS and how horrible it is now, yet shows a console FPS with literally one of the worst control schemes ever given to an FPS game.
Don't get me wrong time splitters is the shit but jesus fucking christ the controls were horrible.
I also think its really funny how he says that vehicles were a solution to a created problem.
Its like he doesn't know that vehicles are the staple of battlefield and that the maps were designed around the vehicles, not the other way around.
this person doesn't understand that you cannot compare two things of different genres as an example why all said modernized things are bad now
theres no maze like map design because it's taking place in a realistic city. there is no zapping electroguns because it's setting doesn't fucking call for it. you dont move at 80mph because the setting doesn't call for it either. how about you compare a modern shooter from 1990 to a modern shooter from 2014. hmm i wonder if that's even possible. his argument is ridiculous.
And information overload? is this guy stupid? in older games all that there was were CTF and deathmatches and survival. in a map literally the size of a fat man's chode, you don't need blips on the screen to see where they are. in a map that stretches on for miles, you kind of need to know where the shit is to defend your flag.
I'm not saying that all the new modern military shooters are good, it's a simple fact that oversaturation is bad for all parties involved. What I am saying though, is this person has no idea how to coherently develop an argument that even suggests what he internally thinks is wrong with modern video games. If you don't like realistic genres then don't fucking play them. play science fiction games. You know, the ones where the setting calls for super jumping, running at 50 miles an hour, shooting electricity from your gun and exploding people into red goo by tossing a space grenade by their feet. No one is forcing you to play them. There are pleny of alternatives, no matter how hard they are to find.
Got to love how he is comparing quake to a trailer of bf4 lol. Ya the trailer is fucking slow its meant to show shit off. Also have to love that he is comparing the two when one of the games wasn't even released at the time of the video. I have a good idea lets make a comparison to a games that you haven't done full research on. Its basically like one of those kids that sits there and wines about how stupid today is and how fucking great the 90s were man.
Wow this guy thinks Quake 1 is a bad game compared to the others he can just go die in a 10 ft hole
[QUOTE=Bloodshot12;44898512]Wow this guy thinks Quake 1 is a bad game compared to the others he can just go die in a 10 ft hole[/QUOTE]
That's not really all that deep, though.
I'll put some lava in there
[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;44898540]That's not really all that deep, though.[/QUOTE]
Deep enough to kill you in a modern game.
As long as there's no invisible wall
[QUOTE=Bloodshot12;44898512]Wow this guy thinks Quake 1 is a bad game compared to the others he can just go die in a 10 ft hole[/QUOTE]
I think he said it was in comparison to the later games in series though, so I'm guessing he was referring to Quake 2 and 3.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
