still going to be bushes with sniper rifles shooting at me :(
also better make it so if you hit the fuel tank it explode
Invisible flamethrower attachment perk #1 go!
[IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/fas.jpg[/IMG]
Rushed content, woot woot.
Wait, theres more!
I call this one the "I'm on fire? What? Excuse me I gotta reload"
[IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/ffs2.jpg[/IMG]
Then this one, "My magical flame wuffer will kill all you!" screamed a 13 year old.
[IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/ffsf2.jpg[/IMG]
Well oh well.
I'm so going to buy this. I love flamethrowers in games and 10-15€ ain't too much for a game that I bought for 30€ on release date
[QUOTE=Covalent;25869266]Invisible flamethrower attachment perk #1 go!
[img_thumb]http://filesmelt.com/dl/fas.jpg[/img_thumb]
Rushed content, woot woot.[/QUOTE]
That is pretty poor haha.
This is just a multiplayer expansion, right?
Yes
Basic PC gameplay still pisses me off to no end. It feels so unbalanced.
I'm looking forward to Project Reality Vietnam more then this.
$15? That's actually fairly reasonable.
Oh its only 15$
Here i was thinking it was a new game or something
:sigh:'s of releif
No Vietnam without flamethrowers.
Why do I have a feeling that BC is REALLY trying to copy COD now?
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;25873784]Why do I have a feeling that BC is REALLY trying to copy COD now?[/QUOTE]
Hurr, a game has flamethrowers it must be a COD clone rite?
AVP has flamethrowers, IT MUST BE A COD CLONE!
Alien Swarm has flamethrowers, IT MUST BE A COD CLONE!
Far Cry has flamethrowers, IT MUST BE A COD CLONE!
What about CoD Black Ops with the napalm strike? Battlefield: Vietnam had napalm strikes years before Black Ops. COD MUST BE A BATTLEFIELD CLONE!
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;25873784]Why do I have a feeling that BC is REALLY trying to copy COD now?[/QUOTE]
Because you don't know what you're talking about?
[QUOTE=The Vman;25873869]Hurr, a game has flamethrowers it must be a COD clone rite?[/QUOTE]
I'm not talking about the stupid flamethrower. It just seemed that BF pulled a new Vietnam game out of nowhere, right after Black Ops was announced
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;25874024]I'm not talking about the stupid flamethrower. It just seemed that BF pulled a new Vietnam game out of nowhere, right after Black Ops was announced[/QUOTE]
BFBC2: Vietnam was announced at E3
[QUOTE=Covalent;25869266]Invisible flamethrower attachment perk #1 go!
[img_thumb]http://filesmelt.com/dl/fas.jpg[/img_thumb]
Rushed content, woot woot.
Wait, theres more!
I call this one the "I'm on fire? What? Excuse me I gotta reload"
[img_thumb]http://filesmelt.com/dl/ffs2.jpg[/img_thumb]
Then this one, "My magical flame wuffer will kill all you!" screamed a 13 year old.
[img_thumb]http://filesmelt.com/dl/ffsf2.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
It's battlefield. What did you expect.
Tanks don't have secondary weapons modeled.
And the guy reloading is another battlefield thing. Why make a game ultra realistic if it messes with the gameplay. Would suck to go into some burn animation as soon as you're on fire.
I think it's the trend in gaming... remember when at one point most games were WWII games before? Now we've shifted from WWII to Modern to Vietnam
they need to do a medieval FPS game. would be awesome
[QUOTE=Kill001;25874627]I think it's the trend in gaming... remember when at one point most games were WWII games before? Now we've shifted from WWII to Modern to Vietnam[/QUOTE]
Uhh, this is just a re imagining of Battlefield Vietnam, a game that came out around 2002.
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;25873784]Why do I have a feeling that BC is REALLY trying to copy COD now?[/QUOTE]
:downs:
[QUOTE=Covalent;25869266]Invisible flamethrower attachment perk #1 go!
[img_thumb]http://filesmelt.com/dl/fas.jpg[/img_thumb]
Rushed content, woot woot.
Wait, theres more!
I call this one the "I'm on fire? What? Excuse me I gotta reload"
[img_thumb]http://filesmelt.com/dl/ffs2.jpg[/img_thumb]
Then this one, "My magical flame wuffer will kill all you!" screamed a 13 year old.
[img_thumb]http://filesmelt.com/dl/ffsf2.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
can you possibly nitpick more?
[editline]5th November 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;25873784]Why do I have a feeling that BC is REALLY trying to copy COD now?[/QUOTE]
Idiot
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;25874024]I'm not talking about the stupid flamethrower. It just seemed that BF pulled a new Vietnam game out of nowhere, right after Black Ops was announced[/QUOTE]
1: BF:BC Vietnam was announced [I]before[/I] Black Ops
2: Black Ops isn't even a Vietnam (specific) game.
3: Battlefield did Vietnam [I]way[/I] before CoD.
[QUOTE=camper182 V2;25876065]can you possibly nitpick more?[/QUOTE]
could you possibly fanboy more?
I played all the battlefield games, bad company 2 is one of the worst, and this rushed content just perpetuates my opinion of it.
I have tried this game today for like 20-30 min
It's awesome.
[QUOTE=sami-pso;25874555]It's battlefield. What did you expect.
Tanks don't have secondary weapons modeled.
And the guy reloading is another battlefield thing. Why make a game ultra realistic if it messes with the gameplay. Would suck to go into some burn animation as soon as you're on fire.[/QUOTE]
Actually, in all the times I played the battlefield series, nothing feels more rushed than this content.
Battlefield Vietnam had more shit in it then this, even then it was better. Of course it was a full game, still.
The Flame Effects look like shit.
[QUOTE=Torfaldur;25875105]they need to do a medieval FPS game. would be awesome[/QUOTE]
The Field of Battling: Wretched Fyle
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
