Feminist Hillary Supporter flips off Trump Supporter, gets chased, bitches to a policeman about it.
55 replies, posted
[video]https://youtu.be/q5q7Qe5bGGE[/video]
I feel sorry for the son of this crazy bitch.
I refuse to believe that anyone who supports Hillary is a feminist. Not an actual one, but the raging retard version of what "feminist" is suppose to mean.
I can't believe how well that Police Officer handled her being irate and obscene over some yard signs.
Hope her kid turns out better than she did.
[QUOTE=HookerVomit;51097482]I refuse to believe that anyone who supports Hillary is a feminist. Not an actual one, but the raging retard version of what "feminist" is suppose to mean.[/QUOTE]
She seems pretty adamant about her support at the end of the video
[QUOTE=RIPBILLYMAYS;51097499]I can't believe how well that Police Officer handled her being irate and obscene over some yard signs.
Hope her kid turns out better than she did.[/QUOTE]
well, she isn't black, so of course it was handled well.
Guess no one got the fact from this? Cause cops can't logically handle a black person? no? ok.
[QUOTE=HookerVomit;51097482]I refuse to believe that anyone who supports Hillary is a feminist. Not an actual one, but the raging retard version of what "feminist" is suppose to mean.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=HookerVomit;51097510]well, she isn't black, so of course it was handled well.[/QUOTE]
I'm so terribly confused by these posts
Can we stop calling these retards "Feminists" please? They're just bigoted, uneducated and self-entitled morons who use Feminism as a shield to push their own agendas.
It's also degrading to genuine, hard working and kind people out there who are trying to make the world a better place for women when this type of person in the video are what folks think of now when you hear the word "Feminist".
It's a sad case of the loud minority defining the silent majority, but in this case the silent minority aren't even part of the movement, they've just wormed their way into association.
[QUOTE=WJS;51097574]Can we stop calling these retards "Feminists" please? They're just bigoted, uneducated and self-entitled morons who use Feminism as a shield to push their own agendas[/QUOTE]
Labels get smeared by the people who wear them because they redefine what the label means.
Its unfortunate but feminism=being a raging misanthrope is a consequence of the people who have been using the term for themselves over the past few years.
[QUOTE=srobins;51097554]I'm so terribly confused by these posts[/QUOTE]
Why?
[QUOTE=HookerVomit;51097602]Why?[/QUOTE]
You saying cops can't handle black women is about as prejudice as saying Trump supporters are racists
[QUOTE=RIPBILLYMAYS;51097614]You saying cops can't handle black women is about as prejudice as saying Trump supporters are racists[/QUOTE]
im a black woman...
[QUOTE=HookerVomit;51097620]im a black woman...[/QUOTE]
Have you ever spoken to a cop?
[editline]24th September 2016[/editline]
Also love the irony of accusing a group of prejudice while in the same breath literally saying some by the books prejudiced shit.
[QUOTE=HookerVomit;51097620]im a black woman...[/QUOTE]
Then you're a black woman who made a bigoted statement
[QUOTE=AaronM202;51097633]Have you ever spoken to a cop?
[editline]24th September 2016[/editline]
Also love the irony of accusing a group of prejudice while in the same breath literally saying some by the books prejudiced shit.[/QUOTE]
This is so counter productive. I'm not a child. I know not all cops are bad, but its obvious I was speaking on media and overall gun happy police.
What are you even talking about right now by the way? Cops are not the same race. Its a profession. Unless you're talking about feminists? Or did you think I was trying to say that black people are hard to handle?
Tough crowd.
[editline]24th September 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=TheBloodyNine;51097637]Then you're a black woman who made a bigoted statement[/QUOTE]
Again, how?
[editline]24th September 2016[/editline]
Well, Im not bored anymore.
[QUOTE=HookerVomit;51097647]This is so counter productive. I'm not a child. I know not all cops are bad, but its obvious I was speaking on media and overall gun happy police. [/QUOTE]
Correct me if im wrong but im pretty sure the reason police doing bad shit is news worthy is because its uncommon of police at large, who i assume most are genuinely good people in most parts of the country. The little weird ass zinger doesnt help anyone, its just stupid.
[QUOTE=HookerVomit;51097647]What are you even talking about right now by the way? Cops are not the same race. Its a profession.[/QUOTE]
"All cops cannot handle black people logically!" Do you not see the inherent irony of this? You're accusing a group of individuals as behaving a certain way without evidence or reason because of preconceived notions.
[QUOTE=HookerVomit;51097647]Unless you're talking about feminists? Or did you think I was trying to say that black people are hard to handle?
Tough crowd.[/QUOTE]
It would help if you would say something coherent.
[editline]24th September 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=HookerVomit;51097647]
Again, how?[/QUOTE]
*ahem*
[quote][b]prej·u·dice
ˈprejədəs/Submit
noun
1.
preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.
"English prejudice against foreigners"
synonyms: preconceived idea, preconception, prejudgment
"male prejudices about women"[/b]
2.
LAW
harm or injury that results or may result from some action or judgment.
"prejudice resulting from delay in the institution of the proceedings"
synonyms: detriment, harm, damage, injury, hurt, loss
"without prejudice to the interests of others"
verb
1.
give rise to prejudice in (someone); make biased.
"the statement might prejudice the jury"
synonyms: bias, influence, sway, predispose, make biased, make partial, color
"the article could prejudice the jury"
2.
LAW
cause harm to (a state of affairs).
"delay is likely to prejudice the child's welfare"
synonyms: damage, be detrimental to, be prejudicial to, injure, harm, hurt, spoil, impair, undermine, hinder, compromise
"this could prejudice his chances of victory"[/quote]
[quote][b]big·ot·ry
ˈbiɡətrē/
noun
intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.
"the difficulties of combating prejudice and bigotry"[/b][/quote]
[quote=Example][b]well, she isn't black, so of course it was handled well.
Guess no one got the fact from this? Cause cops can't logically handle a black person? no? ok.[/b]
[/quote]
[QUOTE=RIPBILLYMAYS;51097587]Labels get smeared by the people who wear them because they redefine what the label means.
Its unfortunate but feminism=being a raging misanthrope is a consequence of the people who have been using the term for themselves over the past few years.[/QUOTE]
Feminism used to be a good thing (Womans rights were ONLY a good thing) but now it's just a word stupid cunts use to justifying being angry over everyone else not being strictly female and it sucks
You know what, I was with her for the most part but then she showed how thick is the ideological lens that she sees the world through.
The officer is telling her not to mess with the guy because he's the type of person who's gonna chase you down with a car if you flip him off and the only way this woman is able to interpret it is "he's allowed to do it then", even though the officer tells her that's not what he's saying.
This is very telling on how black and white her thinking is. It's either one person is 100% in the wrong and the other 100% right and everything that person has done was "good" and justified or vice versa. And when the officer tells her not to do something he must be saying she's the person in the wrong and the guy is in the right. Like she can't comprehend that they've both done something that they shouldn't have.
A cop is 18.5x more likely to be shot by a black male than a black male is going to be shot by a cop.
It is an absurd statement to say that cops are trigger-happy with a disparity such as that.
[QUOTE=WJS;51097574]Can we stop calling these retards "Feminists" please? They're just bigoted, uneducated and self-entitled morons who use Feminism as a shield to push their own agendas.
It's also degrading to genuine, hard working and kind people out there who are trying to make the world a better place for women when this types of person in the video are what folks think of now when you hear the word "Feminist".
It's a sad case of the loud minority defining the silent majority, but in this case the silent minority aren't even part of the movement, they've just wormed their way into association.[/QUOTE]
You're going to lose this line of argument with "feminists". They will tell you that you don't have the authority to dictate who's good and who's a bad feminist. Especially as a privileged white male no less. If you try to go with the definitions route, you know "equality", then they will just say that fight for women doesn't have to be calm and nice and it's totally justified to be mean to the oppressor and it's not sexist or bigoted in any way because these things are like a one-way street, down the oppression ladder. In a more convoluted way but that's the narrative.
[QUOTE=dimitrik129;51097686]A cop is 18.5x more likely to be shot by a black male than a black male is going to be shot by a cop.
It is an absurd statement to say that cops are trigger-happy with a disparity such as that.[/QUOTE]
back it up?
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;51097695]You're going to lose this line of argument with "feminists". They will tell you that you don't have the authority to dictate who's good and who's a bad feminist. Especially as a privileged white male no less. If you try to go with the definitions route, you know "equality", then they will just say that fight for women doesn't have to be calm and nice and it's totally justified to be mean to the oppressor and it's not sexist or bigoted in any way because these things are like a one-way street, down the oppression ladder. In a more convoluted way but that's the narrative.[/QUOTE]
Pretty much, it's like playing chess with a Pigeon...
They won't play back and they'll just shit all over the place and act like they've won. Good thing I keep far away from the places these type of people hang out at.
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;51097695]You're going to lose this line of argument with "feminists". They will tell you that you don't have the authority to dictate who's good and who's a bad feminist. Especially as a privileged white male no less. If you try to go with the definitions route, you know "equality", then they will just say that fight for women doesn't have to be calm and nice and it's totally justified to be mean to the oppressor and it's not sexist or bigoted in any way because these things are like a one-way street, down the oppression ladder. In a more convoluted way but that's the narrative.[/QUOTE]
I generally agree, and just adding to this point, but the same issues occur when attempting to argue with any hard line ideological thinker. The myopic lens with which it is required to view the entire world with such absolutism necessitates a level of cognitive dissonance. It doesn't matter if you're arguing with feminists, MRAs, liberals, conservatives, etc.
A moderate person can disagree with you while still understanding where you're coming from, a ideological hardliner needs to see the world as an absolute dichotomy, full of truisms and false assumptions, in order to even function. Criticizing their beliefs becomes a personal attack on their identity, because their identity is completely interwoven with their political beliefs. They are incapable of emphasizing with another human being who isn't a part of their group.
It isn't so much what you believe that matters, or even how strongly you believe it, but whether or not you are willing or even able to consider other points of view that don't mesh with your idea of reality. Some people are too emotionally vulnerable, too egoistic, too lacking in individual accountability and too unwilling to be wrong in order to consider a nuanced position on any issue, so instead they latch onto a hardline ideological group that gives them an easy target to hate and makes them immune to criticism or wrongdoing. The same group will often pat them on the back and encourage them for cherrypicking blog headlines that show how evil their opposition is, providing a support network that eventually replaces friends and family and makes it even harder to 'quit'.
There is such a thing as being "too moderate", but that doesn't seem to be the most prevalent issue today, or at least not in this particular instance.
[QUOTE=Zyler;51097757]I generally agree, and just adding to this point, but the same issues occur when attempting to argue with any hard line ideological thinker. The myopic lens with which it is required to view the entire world with such absolutism necessitates a level of cognitive dissonance. It doesn't matter if you're arguing with feminists, MRAs, liberals, conservatives, etc.
A moderate person can disagree with you while still understanding where you're coming from, a ideological hardliner needs to see the world as an absolute dichotomy, full of truisms and false assumptions, in order to even function. Criticizing their beliefs becomes a personal attack on their identity, because their identity is completely interwoven with their political beliefs. They are incapable of emphasizing with another human being who isn't a part of their group.
It isn't so much what you believe that matters, or even how strongly you believe it, but whether or not you are willing or even able to consider other points of view that don't mesh with your idea of reality. Some people are too emotionally vulnerable, too egoistic, too lacking in individual accountability and too unwilling to be wrong in order to consider a nuanced position on any issue, so instead they latch onto a hardline ideological group that gives them an easy target to hate and makes them immune to criticism or wrongdoing. The same group will often pat them on the back and encourage them for cherrypicking blog headlines that show how evil their opposition is, providing a support network that eventually replaces friends and family and makes it even harder to 'quit'.
There is such a thing as being "too moderate", but that doesn't seem to be the most prevalent issue today, or at least not in this particular instance.[/QUOTE]
I agree with everything you've said. It's very telling when someone takes disagreement with their ideology as a personal attack.
And the inability to even imagine that you're wrong, you know, consider the possibility not accept it, just makes my blood boil. You can't even have a conversation with a person like that because they won't even [U]try[/U] to understand what you're saying because they "know" it to be wrong before you said it.
[QUOTE=J!NX;51097676]Feminism used to be a good thing (Womans rights were ONLY a good thing) but now it's just a word stupid cunts use to justifying being angry over everyone else not being strictly female and it sucks[/QUOTE]
the feminists people hate mostly just stay on line and don't really appear too often in the greater world.
most people who say feminism is ruined never believed in it in the first place
Although she seems nuts and was needlessly provoking someone, I think the guy was more in the wrong for actually chasing someone down (assuming her account is 99% valid).
[QUOTE=TheBloodyNine;51097779]the feminists people hate mostly just stay on line and don't really appear too often in the greater world.
most people who say feminism is ruined never believed in it in the first place[/QUOTE]
Reminds me of people who think GamerGate is a world-threatening terrorist group or that meme magic is real.
Some people need to get off the internet IMO.
And I know that's ironic coming from a gold member.
oh boy it gets worse
[video]https://youtu.be/99DyQ-kdIbQ[/video]
[QUOTE=RIPBILLYMAYS;51097814]oh boy it gets worse
[video]https://youtu.be/99DyQ-kdIbQ[/video][/QUOTE]
There's so much wrong in this video that it would take like at least an hour to address everything...
[QUOTE]I generally agree, and just adding to this point, but the same issues occur when attempting to argue with any hard line ideological thinker. The myopic lens with which it is required to view the entire world with such absolutism necessitates a level of cognitive dissonance. It doesn't matter if you're arguing with feminists, MRAs, liberals, conservatives, etc.
A moderate person can disagree with you while still understanding where you're coming from, a ideological hardliner needs to see the world as an absolute dichotomy, full of truisms and false assumptions, in order to even function. Criticizing their beliefs becomes a personal attack on their identity, because their identity is completely interwoven with their political beliefs. They are incapable of emphasizing with another human being who isn't a part of their group.
[/QUOTE]
Ive noticed for a long time. Ive noticed absolutists all have the same traits despite ideals, race, sex, creed, religious, non religious, ect...
Then Ive noticed the same traits in the so called "moderates". They all shares the same traits despite creed, gender, ideal, religion or non, ect and they are exact opposite of the absolutists.
In societies with absolutists and no moderates you get societies like Nazi Germany, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Christian Inquisitions, secret societies like the KKK and so on and so on. What happens if you get racism, intolerance, sexism, corruption, financial inequality, social inequality and an oppressive and hellish society that prone to eventually falling apart (like Venezuela )
A society full of absolutists leads to a hellish and onionesque existence. It looks like madness from an outsiders point of view.
A society of moderates I have noticed (people who have traits the polar opposite traits of an absolutist) on various scales tend to be more pleasant and righteous.
Both groups tend to be drawn to ideas suited to their temperament. An absolutist will be drawn to an idea which would excuse the behavior seen in the video (or consider it righteous and moral) and even encourage it in all memebers of society, where people with a "moderate" temperament would prefer ideas that make them better people.
So I because of this I dont classify people based on sex, gender, democrat, liberal. conservative, feminist or republican. I classify them into only two groups.
Absolutist (crazy) and moderate (not crazy). If you want a more equal society, the goal is increase the moderates in society and decrease the absolutists
This lady falls into the crazy camp.
[QUOTE=matt000024;51097785]Although she seems nuts and was needlessly provoking someone, I think the guy was more in the wrong for actually chasing someone down (assuming her account is 99% valid).[/QUOTE]
Thing is that people like her have a history of widely exaggerating the truth to remain in the right or to just straight up fabricate shit.
If she's that willing to pull the victim card she could have literally made up fucking [I]anything[/I] in her account.
She already had very little credibility but at around 3 minutes she completely loses credit when she talks about being on social media and having followers like she's the follower of some army.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.