Isn't the most obvious answer the Guy Fawkes mask?
i like how he's used the same picture of that one woman for every video since that picture came out i think it really displays the massively wide range of criticisms available]
[editline]7th May[/editline]
no joke this is like the fourth or fifth time he's used it
His neck is disproportionately meaty and it bothers me.
They're all pretty bad. I have save you all seven minutes.
I feel as though sometimes he touches a somewhat reasonable point but then over generalizes and doesn't seem to attempt to view things from another perspective other than his own.
[QUOTE=omarfr;44741895]I feel as though sometimes he touches a somewhat reasonable point but then over generalizes and doesn't seem to attempt to view things from another perspective other than his own.[/QUOTE]
the only reasonable point he ever touches is an obvious as shit one that doesn't need to be said, then uses obvious extremes to generalise entire groups of people
then gets tonnes of views from angsty kids
Women being treated fairly: just as bad as a cult
Awkward, cringey masks: just as bad as a cult
What's with his hate boner for Rebecca Watson? It's like she dumped him and he never got over it or something.
all activists are thundercunts
All of the above
You guys will learn to love him
Very good video, thanks for sharing :smile:
The title alone is cringy as fuck, honestly
why is his neck so big
[QUOTE=Scum;44744704]why is his neck so big[/QUOTE]
He's a lizard
he hates christianity too? what a twat
[QUOTE=Pelican;44745124]he hates christianity too? what a twat[/QUOTE]
People hate things they don't understand.
This guy is just as ignorant as the people he is trying to criticize. He is on the exact same low level.
In the end of the clip he says that the internet is the place where religion come and die. Which is true. However, atheism is also going to the internet and it will die there aswell. People will realize that atheism it is just another belief system which does not bring us any higher knowledge. It only makes us blind to eachother.
Keep in mind that science and reason can exist without atheism and religion. The true path lies within your heart and soul. Have faith in that which keeps us togheter, not in what tears us apart.
You do realize that atheism is "lack of religion"*, right?
How can something be both without religion and without "without religion"?
Atheism works by not taking things on faith, but rather requiring evidence. It's inherently scientific.
*layman's definition, not textbook definition
[QUOTE=Last or First;44746642]You do realize that atheism is "lack of religion"*, right?
How can something be both without religion and without "without religion"?
Atheism works by not taking things on faith, but rather requiring evidence. It's inherently scientific.
*layman's definition, not textbook definition[/QUOTE]
The concept of spreading atheism defeats the purpose of atheism because to spread atheism you must first accept it's a belief, rather than a lack there of. Which is what this fellow and other people who haven't grown past the age of 14 do.
The entire idea that "hey religion caused all those wars it must be bad for everyone" is an entirely simplistic take on history and should not be used as evidence since history tends to be more complex than that.
[QUOTE=Last or First;44746642]You do realize that atheism is "lack of religion"*, right?
How can something be both without religion and without "without religion"?
Atheism works by not taking things on faith, but rather requiring evidence. It's inherently scientific.
*layman's definition, not textbook definition[/QUOTE]
No. Atheism is the remarkable distinction that there is no god or spiritual force present.
Agnosticism is the lack of religion, as it denotes that one is unsure.
I get that you stipulate that this is "just a layman's definition" but if I told you shit and chocolate were the same because they were both brown substances, would you go "Oh well I guess that's okay then." No, you would notice there's a glaring error.
The words can be told as such by being broken down. Atheism breaks down in to "A", a prefix meaning without and "theism", the root word which denotes spirituality. Agnostic breaks down the same way with the prefix "A" meaning without, and "gnostic" being the root which is knowledge.
If you are an Athiest you are comitting yourself to the belief there is not a thing. If however you're more handwringing and want to claim Agnosticism, then you cannot defend Atheism as being the lack of anything alike Agnosticism since Atheism is actually making a factual claim in concern to reality unlike Agnosticism which is only stipulating a lack of conclusive knowledge.
Also neither is inherently scientific. I can unscientifically claim that when we die, there is no afterlife, and that because of that there is no god. I can do that all day long by just claiming it. I can also claim to be unsure of an afterlife because I've never contemplated such a concept, which would make me an unscientific agnostic. Neither of these beliefs have the privilege of being "thinking men's" beliefs anymore. They lie well within the realm of idiocy and madness as all public property does.
Addendum: In fact Agnosticism is the only formulation of these beliefs that is actually scientific. Atheism is a belief, which is held based on the postulates that empirical science works. However empirical science is really limited in its scope of "soul measuring" and "god sensing," so an Atheist actually could not claim to scientifically disbelieve god because no god has been scientifically disproved. In the same way, Christianity is the belief that these is a paternal god who created the world, and a lot of that works because no one has disproved that yet in any conclusive way.
I find it painful that so many people buy into thunderf00t's beliefs. I only had to scroll down to the top comment to get a brain aneurysm.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/3YcV0f7.png[/img]
I can't watch this video, the size of his neck is goddamn distracting.
[QUOTE=Zapp;44744133]You guys will learn to love him[/QUOTE]
I don't think I will learn to appreciate the rants of a misogynistic idiot but thanks for signing up to say so.
[QUOTE=Bread_Baron;44748696]I don't think I will learn to appreciate the rants of a misogynistic idiot but thanks for signing up to say so.[/QUOTE]
He's a misogynist now?, when did he say anything that could be considered as misogyny?Last time I checked, rejecting modern internet ''feminism'' doesn't constitute as misogyny.
wtf what's with the random people joining just to post one reply to this thread?
[QUOTE====;44749651]wtf what's with the random people joining just to post one reply to this thread?[/QUOTE]
well the two options are either some guy who's from Kenya suddenly showed up with full context or they're alts of perma'd users.
[QUOTE=Venezuelan;44749669]well the two options are either some guy who's from Kenya suddenly showed up with full context or they're alts of perma'd users.[/QUOTE]
I prefer to think our first(?) Kenyan member just happens to be a stupid Tfoot supporter rather than some sad nerd who's making alts to post arguments they've already been banned for on a Garrysmod forum
Can we stop posting Thunderf00t videos? They never end well, because he's kind of a shitty person.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
