[url]http://reason.com/blog/2016/03/24/really-stupid-moms-across-america-scarem[/url]
[editline]5th May 2016[/editline]
this whole thing was perpetrated by a very anti GMO group, not to mention the fact that wine is significantly more toxic and carcinogenic than the amounts of glyphosate in this wine.
[QUOTE=Map in a box;50266145][url]http://reason.com/blog/2016/03/24/really-stupid-moms-across-america-scarem[/url]
[editline]5th May 2016[/editline]
this whole thing was perpetrated by a very anti GMO group, not to mention the fact that wine is significantly more toxic and carcinogenic than the amounts of glyphosate in this wine.[/QUOTE]
Yeah I know the rats part is shite; it's a shame that they brought it up. Other studies are finding that glyposate at any level are carcinogenic though like it says near the end.
[url]http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/4302[/url]
And a government study shows there's next to no risk in plants with study needed for runoff water.
[QUOTE=Map in a box;50266242][url]http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/4302[/url]
And a government study shows there's next to no risk in plants with study needed for runoff water.[/QUOTE]
They also need a study for endocrine disruption. Thanks for sharing.
I'm all for this sort of thing but it is usually always run by people with an agenda.
There used to be a huge scare about some foodstuff having an ingredient in it that was "an atom away" from weedkiller or similar which was kind of distressing how a lot of people believed it.
[QUOTE=Map in a box;50266283]I'm all for this sort of thing but it is usually always run by people with an agenda.
There used to be a huge scare about some foodstuff having an ingredient in it that was "an atom away" from weedkiller or similar which was kind of distressing how a lot of people believed it.[/QUOTE]
Yeah for sure, but any way you slice it these days it seems like some sort of agenda is backing the actions taking place. In any case it's interesting to see it on the news.
I find it weird that they're pushing that rat study; if anything it makes their points seem less accurate/worth listening to.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
