• BIA furious 4
    13 replies, posted
Yes, this is a new BIA game, but....just watch [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpYe5Fc96KE[/media] seriously gearbox? i wanted an emotional game like the others, not chainsawing guys on the shitter
I guess they're trying to rope in the same crowd that was amused by the immaturity of games like Bulletstorm. I know what they're doing, but they missed the mark with that trailer.
exactly my thoughts.
sleigh bells, did not expect that
This is not a BIA game.
That does not deserve to be called a Brothers in Arms game. What the fuck happened to being a squad based tactics simulator? This looks like horse shit.
:sigh: They didn't even finish the Holland campaign.
Isn't this a scene from that one movie? Inglorious Basterds? lol Yeah this isn't a BIA game.
Anyone else think, Inglorious Basterds: The Game?
[QUOTE=Edthefirst;30299975]Anyone else think, Inglorious Basterds: The Game?[/QUOTE] that's what I thought it was going to end up being but this is fine too
how do you fuck up this bad hoooooooooooooooooow
You have got to be kidding me what the fuck is this shit?
I really dislike the modern tendencies dev teams have for completely ditching the tactical FPS in favor of immature horse shit like this. You can basically make a time model like this for the FPS genre: pre- and post CoD:MW. It seems like FPS multiplayer really hit the mainstream after that game (not saying the first Modern Warfare was bad, in my opinion it was brilliant), and since then devs have dumbed down their games in an attempt to mimic IW's formula for success. I'm not saying that there's no room for "stupid" shooters, but it really makes me sad when they're developed at the expense of tactical FPS franchises (like the first BiA and the old Rainbow Six games).
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.