If you haven't seen it yet.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZD17pQSqUU&playnext_from=TL&videos=Imh6hPmsm28&feature=sub[/media]
Sorry if this one is a repost but i hadn't seen it anywhere and search is fucked up
that wasnt a gameplay trailer
it was a bunch of gameplay videos badly spliced together
Well most of the videos I had seen were cam corded, Sorry. And that's just the machinima title.
search works [url]http://www.facepunch.com/search.php[/url]
Holy bejeesus, I hadn't seen any of those. Looks fucking awesome.
Can somebody tell the the uneducated loser in this thead when the release date is supposed to be? (Unincluding the extra Valve time)
anyone else sick of this game engine now? what has it been like 10 years?
[QUOTE=oldgregg;22776044]anyone else sick of this game engine now? what has it been like 10 years?[/QUOTE]
6 years.
And I am not sick as of yet, considering the word graphics is not in the word gameplay... Game is.
[QUOTE=oldgregg;22776044]anyone else sick of this game engine now? what has it been like 10 years?[/QUOTE]
It's being upgraded like all the fucking time, it's barely the same as it used to be.
Hell yes.
I can't wait for portal 2 now.
[QUOTE=oldgregg;22776044]anyone else sick of this game engine now? what has it been like 10 years?[/QUOTE]
What do you mean?
ye valve should stop using their Source engine and jump to UT like every huge dev does
sarcasm detectors at theIR FInEST
i cant wait. im gonna preorder it if i can
Imagine the mind bending custom maps that will be created with all this new stuff :ohdear:
[QUOTE=Nexosz;22778167]ye valve should stop using their Source engine and jump to UT like every huge dev does[/QUOTE]
bloom everywhere
DYNAMIC LIGHTING AS FAR AS THE EYE CAN SEE!
Awesome.
[QUOTE=Nexosz;22778167]ye valve should stop using their Source engine and jump to UT like every huge dev does[/QUOTE]
:colbert:
[QUOTE=Nexosz;22778167]ye valve should stop using their Source engine and jump to UT like every huge dev does[/QUOTE]
Except UT engine is a crashy hunk of shit.
At least the older verions, but source is still, in my opinion, much better.
[QUOTE=Dj-J3;22779130]:colbert:[/QUOTE]
:derp:
I really see nothing wrong with the current Source engine.
I have never been picky about games' graphics, but Valve games have never been bad in the graphics department.
[QUOTE=Afnopo;22776072]6 years.
And I am not sick as of yet, considering the word graphics is not in the word gameplay... Game is.[/QUOTE]
The most backwards, antiquated, logic I've heard anyone say on this forum.
Graphics are important, so is gameplay. One is not better than the other when I'm paying money for a high class game.
At least it isn't a cam.
Where can I find the whole non-cam version?
How do you make a game that looks that awesome? Valve never fail to impress.
Like an old friend the slime returns from the digipen institute.
[QUOTE=mzathemind;22779781]Looks mad difficult.[/QUOTE]
They said it will have the same learning curve as the first one, start out simple and get harder later on.
Oh yes...
Bring on the puzzles!
Wheatly is such an awesome character.
Looks good, people really need to get quiet about the source engine. Simply if you don't think that a game that in my opinion, looks fine, but in yours, looks like trash compared to modern games, then simply don't buy it. If you want to buy a game that looks amazing but is horrible, fine by me. I rather play a game that is amazing but looks terrible. If you don't like the game...just don't buy it.
Source Engine is absolutely brilliant, it has so many of the well needed features of modern games ( in addition to many most modern games don't have ) without feeling stereotypical. Not to mention it's near limitless capabilities developer side, UT is comparatively bloated when it comes to Source, and not in a good way.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.