• The science of space combat
    13 replies, posted
[video=youtube;e9wDxO3Q7NI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9wDxO3Q7NI&feature=channel_video_title[/video] Only good thing left on History
brb getting comfy
cool.. dramatization
This made me fall asleep.
star trek is better. As in, it has better effects.
Too many lasers for just 100 years in the future.
Didn't even watch the video all the way but first thing that came to mind when I opened the page [img]http://filesmelt.com/dl/yay_aliens.png[/img]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6q1IaWLsyrQ[/media]
why did I watch all of that it was so silly
I'd like to see a movie with Avatar's production quality that is nothing but an hour long space battle.
Stopped watching 2:20 in: "Anti-matter bomb". :downs: I was hoping for something realistic. You know, maybe a discussion of the logistics of space warfare.
fun to watch, ehh as far as the actual ideas go. Most of them any way.
I might be taking an astronomy class with Professor Filippenko
Interesting, but I think that space battles would be just like how air battles are today. Whoever has the better sensors and range on the weapons will win. I don't see satellites, bunkers, or really anything for either side. The second anything is in the line of site of any type of weapon it will cease to exist. Scifi-esque space battles with little cubes flying everywhere in impossible directions would be pretty awesome though.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.