Cautiously optimistic about it. It doesn't seem that generic apart from music but from what I heard they're trying to sort of stay true to the series
Oh hey it's not Uwe Boll directing, maybe it'll go ok then.
[QUOTE=ChicagoMobster;51221475]...from what I heard they're trying to sort of stay true to the series[/QUOTE]
By focusing mostly on the modern day parts of the game ?
[QUOTE=AntonioR;51221506]By focusing mostly on the modern day parts of the game ?[/QUOTE]
Where did you get the idea that they are?
Weird how they hyped up the stunt for the leap of faith then just CGI'd everything around him.
[QUOTE=AntonioR;51221506]By focusing mostly on the modern day parts of the game ?[/QUOTE]
I'm still convinced the series would have been better off if those segments didn't even exist.
I wonder if that dumbass Animus claw will make it into future games.
[QUOTE=Novangel;51221536]Weird how they hyped up the stunt for the leap of faith then just CGI'd everything around him.[/QUOTE]
Well what'd you expect?
"Here bud jump off this actual building and we'll film you by dropping the camera at the same time"?
24 fps lock? No thanks
[QUOTE=S31-Syntax;51221560]Well what'd you expect?
"Here bud jump off this actual building and we'll film you by dropping the camera at the same time"?[/QUOTE]
Just seems like a lot of excessive work for something that's going to be 90% digitised anyway. Kinda like how the Thing remake used CG over the animatronics.
how do they make glitches and bugs appear in live action
[QUOTE=The bird Man;51221568]24 fps lock? No thanks[/QUOTE]
"It's more cinematic this way!"
[QUOTE=Mr.Brown;51221584]how do they make glitches and bugs appear in live action[/QUOTE]
They'll just fuck around with the projector dials and lenses at random intervals
[QUOTE=simkas;51221528]Where did you get the idea that they are?[/QUOTE]
I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not. It is already known only 35% of the movie is set in the past, and the trailer is also showing mostly modern day scenery which fits that. Not really in the spirit of the series.
[URL="http://www.gamespot.com/articles/assassins-creed-movie-is-65-present-day-35-in-the-/1100-6439828/"]http://www.gamespot.com/articles/assassins-creed-movie-is-65-present-day-35-in-the-/1100-6439828/[/URL]
[URL="http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/05/16/assassins-creed-movie-is-65-present-day-35-past"]http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/05/16/assassins-creed-movie-is-65-present-day-35-past[/URL]
I'm not a big Assassin's Creed fan so I don't know the significance of this, but why couldn't they make the movie about Ezio's story alone or something?
The first half of this trailer is really uninteresting to me. I didn't give two shits about it cause to me that wasn't Assassin's Creed, it's just some sub plot that's in the way of what I really wanted to see.
[QUOTE=ClauAmericano;51221999]I'm not a big Assassin's Creed fan so I don't know the significance of this, but why couldn't they make the movie about Ezio's story alone or something?
The first half of this trailer is really uninteresting to me. I didn't give two shits about it cause to me that wasn't Assassin's Creed, it's just some sub plot that's in the way of what I really wanted to see.[/QUOTE]
Because adapting the actual story of a game is a terrible idea that never works and no one wants to see just a re-telling of a story we already know. Making a new story that's set in the world of the game and retains some of the elements is always a much better idea.
The effect of him in the past combined with the animus looks pretty cool. This animus makes more sense than what we have in the games.
[QUOTE=Novangel;51221583]Just seems like a lot of excessive work for something that's going to be 90% digitised anyway. Kinda like how the Thing remake used CG over the animatronics.[/QUOTE]
Isn't that where CG is good though? Good at environments, but bad at people? Paraphrasing that Rocket Jump video that gets reposted every few months.
[QUOTE=MisterSjeiks;51222095]The effect of him in the past combined with the animus looks pretty cool. This animus makes more sense than what we have in the games.[/QUOTE]
Its because the game version the animus was part of the poorly done modern day sections. And they sorta got stuck with it after ac 1 introduced it.
And the chair animus is really lame for a live action movie. Plus the claw actually shows how the animus "Bleeding Effect" creates muscle memory
[QUOTE=Hiccuper;51222712]Isn't that where CG is good though? Good at environments, but bad at people? Paraphrasing that Rocket Jump video that gets reposted every few months.[/QUOTE]
Computers do static things extremely well. Its people where it sucks, since they are complicated.
Nothing looks real.
No Jeremy Irons as Pope Alexander 0/10
Been there, done that
[IMG]http://1657156.sites.myregisteredsite.com/The%20Borgias/jeremy-irons-the-borgias-still1.jpg[/IMG]
Honestly if the AC franchise didn't exist and this trailer just came out of nowhere showing off Fassbender in high concept sci fi/history shit, people would go apeshit about how great it looks. It's a testament to how bad video game movies are that people are so (probably rightly so) scared that this will be garbage.
PG-13.
I'm not hopeful.
What happened to the animus
[QUOTE=The bird Man;51221568]24 fps lock? No thanks[/QUOTE]
i too refuse to listen to anything other than FLAC
[QUOTE=Saxon;51225110]What happened to the animus[/QUOTE]a dentist chair/examination table device is too boring for hollywood, got to have huge robotic moving parts
It also makes more sense than the game animus.
[QUOTE=Dirty_Ape;51224145]Honestly if the AC franchise didn't exist and this trailer just came out of nowhere showing off Fassbender in high concept sci fi/history shit, people would go apeshit about how great it looks. It's a testament to how bad video game movies are that people are so (probably rightly so) scared that this will be garbage.[/QUOTE]
Even as a fan of the series (at least up to Rogue) the trailer looks a bit run of the mill to me. I like that they're using it to expand the universe instead of a butchered retelling of a game, but these trailers just don't do much to excite me.
[editline]19th October 2016[/editline]
Trailers aside, I'm hoping it'll have something cool from the First Civ.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
