Classic Spider-Man, liked the first except for the incredible retarded design of the Lizard, the actor himself I really really liked, but that didn't stop me from liking the movie.
I'll love this since the villains don't look like retards, I like Andrew Garfield as Spider-Man and it seems like a blast all-together. I don't know what people are on with "the CGI is shit". It's different but not to the point where I'd say it's bad.
tl;dr
Will defo watch in cinema, not first day probs but first week.
Im still not sure how I feel about this movie.
On one hand I like where it's going but on the other I hate it for some reason...
I don't get why they haven't been able to put Carnage in, after 5 movies they haven't even mentioned him.
hard to portray Carnage properly without an age rating of M R 18+ Banned In Australia and that's well outside the target audience
[QUOTE=booster;44289067]I don't get why they haven't been able to put Carnage in, after 5 movies they haven't even mentioned him.[/QUOTE]
They'd have to do Venom first to be able to do Carnage.
It's great to see Dane DeHaan giving a role where he isn't portraying some sickly-looking, weak, shy character. I think he's an amazing actor but I always hate the roles he's given. I'm tired of seeing him looking like some bow-legged beggar in everything he plays. He suits the villain really well imo
Didn't like the first movie though, not sure if I'll like this, it seems good with the action though.
Really lovin the art design, it's super colorful and stylistic.
[QUOTE=loopoo;44289838]It's great to see Dane DeHaan giving a role where he isn't portraying some [B]sickly-looking[/B], weak, shy character. I think he's an amazing actor but I always hate the roles he's given. I'm tired of seeing him looking like some bow-legged beggar in everything he plays. He suits the villain really well imo
Didn't like the first movie though, not sure if I'll like this, it seems good with the action though.[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/QYekZnQ.jpg[/IMG]
I think this film captures Spider-Man the hero better than Sam Raimi did generally, though I think Spider-Man 2 is still my overall favorite.
Andrew Garfield though was painful to watch in the first Amazing Spider-Man though. All his lines were delivered in exasperated stutters.
[QUOTE=booster;44289067]I don't get why they haven't been able to put Carnage[/QUOTE]
because spiderman films aren't made for spiderman fans they're made for babies and big bang theory 'nerds' so they're not going to put a villain in that 90% of the people watching the film will have no prior knowledge of
This looks like shit
Why is rhino a robot again?
[editline]19th March 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=ChestyMcGee;44290379]because spiderman films aren't made for spiderman fans they're made for babies and big bang theory 'nerds' so they're not going to put a villain in that 90% of the people watching the film will have no prior knowledge of[/QUOTE]
They should pull a dark knight and do a grim adult version of spider-man with venom and carnage as villains.
It looks colorful and fun.
More than you can say about the last two spider-man movies.
Probably won't have any non-cgi fights though
People comin in with high grades explosives, gliders n mech suits n shit, why isn't the military here by now? I mean I understand it's a super hero movie, but would the united states government just wait it out to see how spiderman handles all this?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
