• World Trade Center's Collapse Explained [debuking 9/11 conspiracy theories]
    35 replies, posted
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMZ-nkYr46w[/media]
Am sick and tired of these conspiracy theories Let it go, people don't need to be reminded of that terrible day
1000 years in the future people will be arguing about 9/11. Until aliens contact us and tell us that they really did it.
[QUOTE=GenPol;36426674][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMZ-nkYr46w[/media][/QUOTE] Why are you so keen into proving how it happened, that you had to create 3 separate threads to do so. [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1192285[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1192284[/url] Until solid proof is presented we can never tell how it all went down (no pun intended).
[QUOTE=icefire.wi;36428442]Why are you so keen into proving how it happened, that you had to create 3 separate threads to do so. [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1192285[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1192284[/url] Until solid proof is presented we can never tell how it all went down (no pun intended).[/QUOTE] he joined in june 2012 and has over 500 posts...
[QUOTE=icefire.wi;36428442]Until solid proof is presented we can never tell how it all went down (no pun intended).[/QUOTE] um no we kind of do two planes crashed into two buildings, and they fell down.
I don't really think it was a conspiracy, but what was that stuff falling from the building that looked a little like thermite?
I say let the non believers go about thier lives loving the goverment who stabbed them in the back. When the NWO comes about I'll be going around shouting " I TOLD YOU SO"
[QUOTE=Adamhully;36430992]I don't really think it was a conspiracy, but what was that stuff falling from the building that looked a little like thermite?[/QUOTE] It's said in all of the official reports of 9/11 to be molten steel caused by the fires that burned from the jet fuel. Although the burning jet fuel couldn't possibly reach temperatures high enough to melt the steel. I'm not siding with either party here, just explaining.
[QUOTE=HolyCrapAWalrus;36431160]It's said in all of the official reports of 9/11 to be molten steel caused by the fires that burned from the jet fuel. Although the burning jet fuel couldn't possibly reach temperatures high enough to melt the steel. I'm not siding with either party here, just explaining.[/QUOTE] No, it was sighted as molten aluminum. [editline]21st June 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Adamhully;36430992]I don't really think it was a conspiracy, but what was that stuff falling from the building that looked a little like thermite?[/QUOTE] [B]molten aluminum[/B]
there was a lot of evidence suggesting that there actually was some sort of explosion when it fell, it really sparked my interest when I read some of the conspiracies.
I am in the Army and I can tell you that if the government did anything, there is about a zero percent probability that they would ever be able to keep something huge like that under wraps. We really suck at keeping secrets.
It's the same thing as with the JFK assassination. People just don't want to believe that individual people really can accomplish things, they'd much rather believe it's a huge conspiracy that goes all the way to the highest level of government because it's far more interesting. Well guess what; A man really was able to shoot the president, and men really were able to highjack commercial aircraft and use them as weapons. Deal with it.
[QUOTE=BusterBluth;36431546]No, it was sighted as molten aluminum. [editline]21st June 2012[/editline] [B]molten aluminum[/B][/QUOTE] Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't aluminum have a melting point of around 600 degrees Celsius while the burning temperature of jet fuel in the open air is 200-300 degrees Celsius?
[QUOTE=polarbear.;36431640]there was a lot of evidence suggesting that there actually was some sort of explosion when it fell, it really sparked my interest when I read some of the conspiracies.[/QUOTE] Really? Care to share it?
Jesus fuck I hate this argument [B]the towers were already on fire before the damn planes hit the buildings.[/B] They were trying to put out a fire in the towers that had been going before the planes were hijacked and having issues containing it. When the world's second biggest passenger jet hits a building at over a [B]hundred fucking miles an hour[/B], it tends to cause an absurd amount of damage. The people who think this was the work of the American government are either looking for another reason to skewer the US, or are currently financing to build their [B]pillbox[/B] in North Dakota. [editline]21st June 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=bIgFaTwOrM12;36432860]Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't aluminum have a melting point of around 600 degrees Celsius while the burning temperature of jet fuel in the open air is 200-300 degrees Celsius?[/QUOTE] There was more burning than jet fuel, like debris, which burned consistently for more than 3 hours.
[QUOTE=ewitwins;36433258][B]the towers were already on fire before the damn planes hit the buildings.[/B][/QUOTE] Gonna want a source for that, I've not seen anything like that in any of the million documentaries and stuff about the event.
[QUOTE=bIgFaTwOrM12;36432860]Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't aluminum have a melting point of around 600 degrees Celsius while the burning temperature of jet fuel in the open air is 200-300 degrees Celsius?[/QUOTE] The fires around the impact areas where burning up too 1100 degrees Celsius.
[QUOTE=ewitwins;36433258][B]the towers were already on fire before the damn planes hit the buildings.[/B][/QUOTE] lol
I'm tempted to say "Who Cares" But really, who doesn't care when stupid people waste everyones time and oxygen.
[QUOTE=ReligiousNutjob;36433366]Gonna want a source for that, I've not seen anything like that in any of the million documentaries and stuff about the event.[/QUOTE] Ah my apologies, I meant to say that it was on fire before the second plane hit. There were almost two hours between the two planes hitting the trade center. You have to also take into consideration that the first flight hit the tower 1 at over 460 mph. There's also the fact that the tower relied specifically on one main structural beam in the center, along with 4 gypsum staircases which were annihilated when the plane struck it. The central beam was compromised by over 5 hours of open flames at over 300 degrees celcius. It's been proven that the beam did not melt, but was compromised by this heat. It was the 12 stories crashing down on the rest that brought the entire building down.
[QUOTE=icefire.wi;36428442]Why are you so keen into proving how it happened, that you had to create 3 separate threads to do so. [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1192285[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1192284[/url] Until solid proof is presented we can never tell how it all went down (no pun intended).[/QUOTE] please stop with this pathetic and poorly disguised attempt at neutrality truthers always say "we can never really know" when confronted with evidence that proves them wrong. it's a cheap copout so you can pretend all the shit you watched doesn't exist
[img]http://i.imgur.com/FwUxr.jpg[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/V79KY.jpg[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/vKY3v.jpg[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/cfstM.jpg[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/YMVFv.jpg[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/OY7vW.jpg[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/IBVfo.jpg[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/y706o.jpg[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/fwNgZ.jpg[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/kkBn5.jpg[/img] [img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-MTUV9qlaqY4/Tt623HisCkI/AAAAAAAADfY/8P6gcpzVMpg/s1600/original.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=ewitwins;36433607] There were almost two hours between the two planes hitting the trade center.(..) The central beam was compromised by over 5 hours of open flames [/QUOTE] Your math skills are atrocious "At 8:46 a.m., five hijackers crashed American Airlines Flight 11 into the World Trade Center's North Tower (1 WTC), and at 9:03 a.m., another five hijackers crashed United Airlines Flight 175 into the South Tower (2 WTC)" "The South Tower collapsed at 9:59 a.m. after burning for 56 minutes in a fire caused by the impact of United Airlines Flight 175" "The North Tower collapsed at 10:28 a.m. after burning for 102 minutes" [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks[/url] There was 15 minutes apart from the Planes hitting. And a least an hour between impact and collapse on the second tower, and an hour and a half on the second. I don't know how you can stretch 15 minutes into two hours, and an hour in an half into 5 hours. I'm not trying to argue for the conspiracy theorists, but more your lack of math and reading comprehension bothers me immensely.
What.... What just happened?
[QUOTE=Atheism;36433796]*disturbing images*[/QUOTE] What the fuck?
[QUOTE=ewitwins;36433258] When the world's second biggest passenger jet hits a building at over a [B]hundred fucking miles an hour[/B][/QUOTE] God i would hope it was going over 100 miles per hour, it be on the verge of stalling. You have no sense of time, nor speed...
That Atheism guy is spamming all the threads... I don't understand what compels a person to touch their own poop out of spite of others... But on topic... Wow, To the people actually thinking 9/11 still COULD be a conspiracy, were you like 1 years old when it happened? Were you even born? I'm not a huge 9/11 buff in terms of the facts but what I do know points that it wasn't an inside job. PLANES IT, STRUCTURE GOES WEAK, BAM. Falls...
They usually latch onto the oil argument...
[QUOTE=Atheism;36433796]*Images*[/QUOTE] ~s0 edgy~ :v:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.