Nice, gotta try that! I still hope Ubisoft or someone else will fix the miserable performance while driving. It is SO annoying. >.<
why does the AA still look shit maxed out
It looks fucking horrible. All its done is make the game way too dark and disregarded any of the nice AO effects, it gives things a little bit more depth but it just throws off any kind of ambiance the game had. Everything is also way oversaturated.
[QUOTE=Mr cake fingers;44950125]It looks fucking horrible. All its done is make the game way too dark and disregarded any of the nice AO effects, it gives things a little bit more depth but it just throws off any kind of ambiance the game had. Everything is also way oversaturated.[/QUOTE]
sweetfx is customizable
or you can be sane and lower the brightness since at start is insanely high.
[QUOTE=codemaster85;44950428]or you can be sane and lower the brightness since at start is insanely high.[/QUOTE]
the tonemap exposure setting is good for this.
it seems to me that ideally, you don't want to touch anything which functions linearly.
for example, instead of using the saturation setting, use vibrance instead.
[url]http://delightlylinux.wordpress.com/2014/01/20/sweetfx-shader-suite[/url]
the page's bottom links demonstrate the settings in more depth
Man that is probably the worst sweet config I've ever seen.
SweetFX is super useless in my opinion, all they ever do is add bloom, fake HDR, and all that jazz.
I like to play my games the way the developers intended to, even if they're washed out or bright as fuck.
For FXAA i can just use the nvidia control panel.
Oh god his desktop..
"Watch_[b]Doges[/b]"
"CoD MW2" and "Swag.txt"
is he trying to be funny?
[QUOTE=DrogenViech;44950870]SweetFX is super useless in my opinion, all they ever do is add bloom, fake HDR, and all that jazz.
I like to play my games the way the developers intended to, even if they're washed out or bright as fuck.
For FXAA i can just use the nvidia control panel.[/QUOTE]
you'll never get exactly what they intended with differences between monitors
sweetfx doesn't force you to use anything, nor are you forced to use high setting values
you can just run it with only smaa on (nvidia actually suggests, [b]as an option[/b], using msaa and smaa through sweetfx)
just because people tend to make shit configs for sweetfx, doesn't make sweetfx shit
I like SweetFX for its SMAA injector which AMD doesn't have by default, and it's a virtually free (in terms of performance,) AA replacement that does good enough by me. Also, the default settings of SweetFX are good for sort of "enhancing" the look of a game; It has very slight saturation, decent AA with SMAA, and a sharpen filter which does a really good job at making the game look cleaner. It's very subtle but it's there.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
