Play hard: the new best gamers. - General

[video][URL]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMkMa1s-Onk[/URL][/video] Thats right, the best gamers is back with rockcock64 with that girl gamerz and a new person who hasnt been introduced yet in loud house. :dance:

I would rather have The Best Gamers but with just rockcock64

YES my life has meaning again

ROCKCOCK64's avatar is the best. <3

I fucking love that 90's style logo

This is the most exciting thing I've heard in months.

[URL]http://loudhouse.vg/[/URL] The new website "preview", it's a Diablo 3 review by rockcock64.

I'm so happy right now. Rockcock64's serious reviews are probably the best video game reviews I've ever seen.

The video is up on the preview now, its a Diablo 3 review.

Oh my fucking god, this is brilliant. I love his serious reviews.

[QUOTE=FlyingAlien;37174618][URL]http://loudhouse.vg/[/URL] The new website "preview", it's a Diablo 3 review by rockcock64.[/QUOTE] He's pretty spot-on with Diablo 3.

good ending

the beat is real

karnivore is better than rockcock. rockcock is not funny at all and barely entertaining. can't wait for people to get bored of his "serious" reviews

[QUOTE=Vedicardi;37175606]karnivore is better than rockcock. rockcock is not funny at all and barely entertaining. can't wait for people to get bored of his "serious" reviews[/QUOTE] karnivore a bitch

the diablo 3 review nearly made me fall asleep. it's worse than i thought

[QUOTE=Vedicardi;37175639]the diablo 3 review nearly made me fall asleep. it's worse than i thought[/QUOTE] i thought it was delightful

Honestly it went on for 17 minutes rehashing point made in nearly every review of the game (other than meaningless shit like the health drops thing); at least that guy that used to "run" the group knew how to edit and be concise. What made rockcock's old reviews great was that "he" provided ideas counter to mainstream/general opinion and did it well, I got nothing out of this that wasn't already blatantly obvious. Blizzard makes money off of the transactions? no way wow!

the diablo 3 review was honestly kind of disappointing. i was expecting like thebestgamers in terms of satire, and this was really just a serious review with a bit of comedy thrown in but it inevitably just addressed everything that's already been addressed about diablo 3

[QUOTE=Vedicardi;37175795]Honestly it went on for 17 minutes rehashing point made in nearly every review of the game (other than meaningless shit like the health drops thing); at least that guy that used to "run" the group knew how to edit and be concise. What made rockcock's old reviews great was that "he" provided ideas counter to mainstream/general opinion and did it well, I got nothing out of this that wasn't already blatantly obvious. Blizzard makes money off of the transactions? no way wow![/QUOTE] its a review, the point is for people like me to watch and see what is good and bad about the game. all of his points were good, especially the difficulty change from 2 to 3.

exactly. I think karnivore's reviews were a good middle ground. he had a few legitimate points in there, and they were presented with humor rather than just by mumbling for 17 minutes about shit everyone already knows [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHA-slBtPYo[/media] [editline]10th August 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=codemaster85;37175819]its a review, the point is for people like me to watch and see what is good and bad about the game. all of his points were good, especially the difficulty change from 2 to 3.[/QUOTE] all of these things are well known problems with the game. He doesn't present them in an entertaining way, and barely in an informative way. It wasn't entertaining for a moment. [editline]10th August 2012[/editline] it fails as a serious review and it fails as a humorous one. I don't even know what he's going for

I love and miss all of The Best Gamers. Hopefully they'll make a return in this, or something.

[QUOTE=Anonymuzz;37175812]the diablo 3 review was honestly kind of disappointing. i was expecting like thebestgamers in terms of satire, and this was really just a serious review with a bit of comedy thrown in but it inevitably just addressed everything that's already been addressed about diablo 3[/QUOTE] I think he is done doing satire reviews. It sounds like the whole point of Loud house is for real reviews, and rockcock64 is really good at that, ya the Diablo 3 shit has been said time and time again, but his other legit game reviews were spot on.

[QUOTE=HoodedSniper;37176085]I think he is done doing satire reviews. It sounds like the whole point of Loud house is for real reviews, and rockcock64 is really good at that, ya the Diablo 3 shit has been said time and time again, but his other legit game reviews were spot on.[/QUOTE] rockcock64's serious review content mostly doubles as a let's play which works well with such a long running time. the fez review was a great serious review because it was a lesser-known game and offered an insightful view on indie games as a whole. serious reviews that are just reviews, and of a game that's already been reviewed to death by now, it just didn't work for me i mean, i am still looking forward to the channel. the diablo 3 review feels like a test run so i hope to see how the editing develops

well they were spot on because they went outside of just reviewing gameplay, looking at developers as well as the community around games and so on, rather than just talking about the gameplay, and those videos were still entertaining [editline]10th August 2012[/editline] also in case anyone forgot someone else wrote most of his "serious" reviews while he was with the best gamers

[QUOTE=FlyingAlien;37174618][URL]http://loudhouse.vg/[/URL][/QUOTE] is there any reason they just had to reference that

Bump [img]http://puu.sh/17krI[/img]