[video=youtube;lf4XjzuQcO4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf4XjzuQcO4[/video]
and i am ashamed of it.
1:24, background.You get nothing else. :suicide:
Coincidentally I was just eating Doritos when I saw this thread.
Should of known there was a relation to Sharks.
lookin' pretty fit bro
[QUOTE=pentium;42813690]Should of known there was a relation to Sharks.[/QUOTE]
No, i was not the shark.
[QUOTE=EpikEnvy2.0;42813700]lookin' pretty fit bro[/QUOTE]
I was in the background :v:
who was you?
"And, uhh, I hear doritos attract sharks, so, good luck!"
[editline]9th November 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=SexualShark;42813702]No, i was not the shark.[/QUOTE]
Guess that solves that.
Sooo which one was you? Why didn't you specify that when your being in it is the entire point of the thread
lmao who thought these advertisements were a good idea
[QUOTE=SexualShark;42813708]I was in the background :v:[/QUOTE]
o-oh
well then
Reminds me of those james bond soda ads.
Except shittier.
Would be fun if he opened the case the Xbox would be all soaked in water
Jesus christ lol, lemon sharks and 5m of depth.
I wouldn't even have needed the air tank.
[QUOTE=be;42813737]Sooo which one was you? Why didn't you specify that when your being in it is the entire point of the thread[/QUOTE]
He said he was in the backround. People are in the foreground.
I think he was the seaweed.
since you've supplied no proof or evidence i'm gonna conclude you're just attention whoring
[QUOTE=Judas;42813807]since you've supplied no proof or evidence i'm gonna conclude you're just attention whoring[/QUOTE]
I'm just going to conclude that you're jealous of his incredibly small claim to fame.
[QUOTE=raineko;42813804]He said he was in the backround. People are in the foreground.
I think he was the seaweed.[/QUOTE]
damn you and your specifics.
[QUOTE=Judas;42813807]since you've supplied no proof or evidence i'm gonna conclude you're just attention whoring[/QUOTE]
Being a random extra in something isn't that difficult, some chick I know was apparently an extra in Ender's Game.
[QUOTE=SexualShark;42813825]damn you and your specifics.[/QUOTE]
It's not specifics. It's basic knowledge
[QUOTE=SexualShark;42813825]damn you and your specifics.[/QUOTE]
Were you perhaps the guy eating the bag of chips? Point it out, man.
So uh... which one is OP? He should've answered that question by now.
I think the op was the fat guy at 1:23 scratching his nuts walking toward the camera
I wouldn't be celebrating when I got out. I'd be getting the heck out!
[QUOTE=Judas;42813807]since you've supplied no proof or evidence i'm gonna conclude you're just attention whoring[/QUOTE]
It's definitely something he would do, I will never forget that IQ incident in SH.
Alright guys, so using my knowledge from watching CSI and spending years perfecting my elite computer hacking skills, I have decided to properly identify SexualShark and solve this mystery once and for all.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/A4wyEbql.png[/IMG]
First off we had to take a look at his avatar, I suspected it might hold a clue to the nature of his appearance. So I decoded it. It's a triangle, so we're obviously looking for three people, but, here's the catch, his avatar is in black and white, so the scene we're looking for had three people, aligned in a triangle, in black and white. Which is here, about 1:07 into the video.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/nrl0psCl.png[/IMG]
But as you can see in this photo, his face is obscured, so using the latest in digital recreation technology, we're going to have to focus exclusively on his face, and enhance the image further.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/Hms636Vl.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/w6Ug6jZl.png[/IMG]
As we began to enhance the image, we noticed there was some sort of secret message hidden in his face, maybe a clue to his identity, to help you locate this, it has been circled in red. We decided to zoom further into this, maybe this is the breakthrough we were looking for.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/Sm6shIHl.png[/IMG]
I, too, was shocked at this discovery. But it all made sense, SexualShark's name. Taking his name, SexualShark, apart we get three sets of threee, sex ual sha rk, and a set of two. So, we separate those two into two groups, because his name is composed of two words, sex ual and sha rk. Now, three letters plus three letters is six letters, and three plus two is six, so we have the number 12. If you take the individual digits from the time of the video and the entire run time of the video, 1,0,7,3,1,0. And add them together, you get 12.
This was the proof we needed to solidify the facts, but what was the connection? Well, twelve divided by three, the number of letters we originally grouped in, is four. And ukulele has four syllables in it. This just proves, with no room for error, that SexualShark was this man on the staircase.
[QUOTE=draugur;42814157]no[/QUOTE]
I feel bad because you probably put some time and work into this post
[QUOTE=SoaringFallus;42814180]I feel bad because you probably put some time and work into this post[/QUOTE]
I actually put no effort into that post, actually. Shit like that is fucking easy, it's just finding stupid shit and making up similarities between them. Anyone can do it.
The grammar alone should pretty much dictate that it was done in about 4 minutes tops. This includes doing everything for the pictures.