Holy shit he doesn't have 60 fps the entire time.
Damn. His computer sucks. :jerkbag:
He gets about 30 more FPS than I would with this game.
I'm so confused. Why was this bad exactly?
Huh? What's wrong with it? Or was that a boasting attempt? You know, when they say "Fuck man LP2 runs really bad on my PC" hoping that you ask "Why?" so they can boast "Oh it keeps around 50fps maxed out man, shit sucks".
Though he should have DX11 and 32xCSAA if he wanted to boast.
Uh. If I get 30FPS in this game I'd climb the walls in joy...
Uh It looks fine, in both graphics quality and frame rate.
What exactly is wrong with it? So what the game have some bugs
I don't think the worst benchmark ever thing applies to the FPS, but instead how the entire benchmark is a crapified demo. You know how you usually have at least a free-floating camera demonstrating specialized resource-heavy environments and conditions? Instead, here we get a crappy AI who not only is a total push-over, but points the camera in the least interesting direction.
As for the game itsself (got it on 360 though) is that there's too little combat vs giants. What you get is great, but everything else is infantry and mech combat and feels really clunky.
Looks pretty smooth to me.
If this is a showoff attempt you're a cock, and you are also an example of the type of person that made me decide to playing games as much. Just an elitist that thinks they are the shit..
holy flying fuck
It's about AI
it really sucked, is that really HARD to notice?
Before you start telling that it's benchmark, not demo/full game, why would they waste effort and scrap AI?
jezz, people
If I got 30 fps in this game I would be as happy as a christian during the second coming of jesus
[QUOTE=GummyPanties;24140904]I don't think the worst benchmark ever thing applies to the FPS, but instead how the entire benchmark is a crapified demo. You know how you usually have at least a free-floating camera demonstrating specialized resource-heavy environments and conditions? Instead, here we get a crappy AI who not only is a total push-over, but points the camera in the least interesting direction.[/QUOTE]
As long as it is as requiring as the actual game, then it's a good benchmark. In fact I think this is a better benchmark than most, because it actually uses real gameplay, and therefore shows what the performance in the real game will be better than most.
Woah, this thread turned into a retard meeting place or something.
I love how the AI decided to slowly walk into the giant turrets path.
Lost plant 2: The plant becomes invisible
[QUOTE=Brage Nyman;24139728][hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfH_xBBrf8k[/hd]
Damn thats bad.[/QUOTE]
Because of FRAPS.
FRAPS eat frames
Huh i thought that people actually was going to watch it. Like 3.30
Note that he isn't actually playing the game/ controlling the character.
AI made me lol...
I cant even run this shit, dont bitch.
[editline]09:10PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Brage Nyman;24142338]Huh i thought that people actually was going to watch it. Like 3.30[/QUOTE]
Oh that part was lawlzy
Oh how i am glad to run it at 12 frames per second.
okay
[b]NOBODY GIVES A SHIT ABOUT YOUR FPS, THIS ISN'T ABOUT FPS AND GRAPHICS, IT'S ABOUT AMAZING AI[/b]
But I actually start to like this AI. It's better than most of human-posters here...
[QUOTE=V3nom;24140348]Holy shit he doesn't have 60 fps the entire time.
Damn. His computer sucks. :jerkbag:[/QUOTE]
Umm the AI is attrocious maybe? Could be the possible reasoning...
I played through that game. You hardly even notice that you have team mates. They typically just stare and get shot.
you do know benchmarks stresses the computer more than the actual game?
Does he shoot once in the entire video?
I hate people like this. You can barely see a fucking difference so quit bitching.
This fucker would not aim down would he?
Nitpicky bastard with super high standards?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
