(CinemaSins) Everything Wrong With The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug - General

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03LhYBNLXWo[/media] [sp] That Iron giant part my god [/sp]

What's wrong with using miles for distances? It's a pretty generic word and doesn't necessary refer to the British/American mile.

I'm surprised he didn't put the 5+ minutes of unnecessary Bilbo reaction faces during the hidden door sequence.

should've added a gorrilion sins for the really jarring gopro shots

Honestly, there's not a single movie worth watching when you sit and pick out the inconsistencies like this, every movie is FILLED with them. That being said, the video made me laugh numerous times, so subbed!

[QUOTE=Aetna;44582572]Honestly, there's not a single movie worth watching when you sit and pick out the inconsistencies like this, every movie is FILLED with them. That being said, the video made me laugh numerous times, so subbed![/QUOTE]Cinemasins is entertainment channel. Most of those "sins" aren't even problems.

These videos are so nitpicky and annoying it hurts. It's not even funny or clever when you're just being a whiny cunt and recording it.

The of hobbit part 2 got the cinema I was in slightly pissed off.

One furnace, to light them all.

[QUOTE=Mr_Awesome;44582901]These videos are so nitpicky and annoying it hurts. It's not even funny or clever when you're just being a whiny cunt and recording it.[/QUOTE] Usually it's so other nerdy cunts can have someone voice it loudly and be heard this way, hey listen to my cunt tales about how fucking picky I am, look at me...that's basically it.

Pretty sure he's made it clear in the past that much of it is supposed to be contrived and unnecessarily picky.

[QUOTE=Doctor Zedacon;44583325]Pretty sure he's made it clear in the past that much of it is supposed to be contrived and unnecessarily picky.[/QUOTE] Who gives a shit if he made it clear, a picky cunt is a picky cunt.

[QUOTE=Grindigo;44583437]Who gives a shit if he made it clear, a picky cunt is a picky cunt.[/QUOTE]So you're bitching about something that he's aware of and is done because its unnecessary. Good job, feel proud of yourself? [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvkZ8sCd5EI[/media]

[QUOTE=Doctor Zedacon;44583458]So you're bitching about something that he's aware of and is done because its unnecessary. Good job, feel proud of yourself? [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvkZ8sCd5EI[/media][/QUOTE] umad brah? [highlight](User was banned for this post (""umad brah?" Really? Post better." - postal))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=Grindigo;44583520]umad brah?[/QUOTE] Watch out guys. We got a badass here.

What about Tauriel not being in the book at all? (Although no one is complaining really. I'd love to fangorn her forest if you know what I mean)

[QUOTE=Grindigo;44583520]umad brah?[/QUOTE] whoa did I just time warp to 2007?

[QUOTE=Doctor Zedacon;44583458]So you're bitching about something that he's aware of and is done because its unnecessary. Good job, feel proud of yourself? [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvkZ8sCd5EI[/media][/QUOTE] Even though i don't mind CinemaSins, being aware of your problems doesn't mean they're going away.

[QUOTE=some_hobo;44583800]What about Tauriel not being in the book at all? (Although no one is complaining really. I'd love to fangorn her forest if you know what I mean)[/QUOTE] There's a lot of differences between the book and movie. If the book was made into a pure film, it'd only take one movie. I like the idea of a trilogy because it gives the illusion that there's more to hope for. But I'm slightly disappointed that the "extra space" is just unnecessary filler instead of interesting material. At least Jackson won't make a Silmarillion movie. That'd be a total clusterfuck.

[QUOTE=yellowoboe;44583560]Watch out guys. We got a badass here.[/QUOTE] I am a badass, no need to point out, but hey thanks for reminding me because I forget sometimes. [QUOTE=Diet Kane;44585133]whoa did I just time warp to 2007?[/QUOTE] You've been here this long? I feel sorry for you, it must be so terrible.

I like how every other movie he does people don't care and seem to understand it's satire but when he does something like this people flip out.

[QUOTE=spekter;44587002]I like how every other movie he does people don't care and seem to understand it's satire but when he does something like this people flip out.[/QUOTE] because tolkien/lotr fans are defensive because deep down they know it's not very good but they love it anyway because they have huge fantasy boners

[QUOTE=Rusty100;44587010]because tolkien/lotr fans are defensive because deep down they know it's not very good but they love it anyway because they have huge fantasy boners[/QUOTE] Any true Tolkien/LOTR fan should really be fucking hating these movies. I know I do, a lot. I honestly hope Peter Jackson retires now, he's dead to me.

It's still a fun ass movie! That waterfall scene was the tits.

[QUOTE=omarfr;44587135]It's still a fun ass movie! That waterfall scene was the tits.[/QUOTE] I had to imagine it as being some generic fantasy movie that took an almost plagiaristic page of inspiration from the Hobbit, and for some reason, these characters that were TOTALLY NOT named after the actual characters from the LOTR universe, were using the names from the LOTR universe to address each other, to barely keep my self from cringing so hard I knocked two atoms together in my face hard enough to cause a small thermonuclear detonation. I would honestly compare them to the Star Wars Prequels in terms of quality, and I mean if Jar Jar Binks was the main character in the prequels as well.

[QUOTE=Grindigo;44586863]I am a badass, no need to point out, but hey thanks for reminding me because I forget sometimes. You've been here this long? I feel sorry for you, it must be so terrible.[/QUOTE] stop

[QUOTE=Grindigo;44583520]umad brah?[/QUOTE] TBH you're probably 12 [editline]19th April 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Rusty100;44587010]because tolkien/lotr fans are defensive because deep down they know it's not very good but they love it anyway because they have huge fantasy boners[/QUOTE] I wouldn't call lotr bad. The Fellowship of the ring is pretty much universally placed on every top 100 film list and is one of the highest grossing films of all time.

Saying the LotR films are bad is the dumbest thing ever. You may dislike them but saying they are bad makes you look like a total idiot. From a cinematographic perspective they are masterpieces. And Cinema Sins is obviously nitpicking but thats what makes it fun. If you don't like the humor don't watch it.

[QUOTE=Rusty100;44587010]because tolkien/lotr fans are defensive because deep down they know it's not very good but they love it anyway because they have huge fantasy boners[/QUOTE] if you're talking about about the hobbit movie sure, if you're talking about the books i will fight you irl

He seemed way more pissed off in this one than usual.