• Loudmouth Feminist Gets Called Out on Fox News
    45 replies, posted
[video=youtube;OjylitC7Xwc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjylitC7Xwc[/video] I'm not usually one to post this stuff, but the ending had me rolling
That host was fucking irritating. This is one of the reasons Fox news is horrible. This debate was horribly biased.
>Fox >News pick one
[QUOTE=Crazy;44673317]That host was fucking irritating. This is one of the reasons Fox news is horrible. This debate was horribly biased.[/QUOTE] That wasn't a debate. It was a shit show. The "feminist" was such a strawman that I have difficulty believing she wasn't an actress.
[QUOTE=/Vando/;44673368]>Fox >News pick one[/QUOTE]But this is fox business Usually fox business is actually much better than fox news, there are some pretty cool people on there. Not all however
[quote=Georgy Bushy]You people are actually insane. You guys are acting out because women are standing up for themselves and trying to have equality! What's so bad with being a feminist? [b]I'm only 12 and I can proudly say I am one.[/b] And the fact that you are referring to a woman who believes that she would have the same rights as a man as men who helped murder millions of innocent people shows how ignorant some men still are. This isn't the 1950s you dicks!•[/quote] God damnit, youtube comments.
what a fucking immature debate though lol. this is always the thing when debating gender roles. stupid useless shit like "which sex is better/happier" usually gets in the way and it stops the actual debate from happening, the real debate on how society itself shapes people instead of people shaping society. just the fact that people getting divorced over money is a thing just shows how corroded marriage as an institution has become.
I can't stand feminists, they instantly go into screaming defense mode as soon as someone questions them or tells them they're wrong. Dude has an excellent point, we ARE taught to make girls happy no matter what. And yeah, men like their cars and golf clubs and shit but women are far more materialistic and brag far more about their shiny shit than any man i've met.
Oh yeah, old story. Men's life expectancy is shorter than women's because (most) women don't have wives.
[QUOTE=DeVotchKa;44674031]Dude has an excellent point, we ARE taught to make girls happy no matter what.[/QUOTE] bullshit remember the "boys will be boys" crap? [editline]29th April 2014[/editline] actually you don't even have to remember it! it's an excuse still being used today
I loved how they staged two women against this guy and he just politely steamrolls them.
Why is like all american TV-debates people screaming in eachothers faces
[QUOTE=Winner;44674351]so much sexist bullshit from both sides this isn't a debate it's shit-flinging[/QUOTE] You shouldn't expect much more from Fox News' main channels, they'll just pit strawmen against straw(wo)men
fox deliberately picks crazies for talk shows tbh it's been really fucked up watching this whole anti-feminist/feminist thing play out on the alternate reality of the internet and take on retarded proportions. feminism didnt used to be a dirty word unless you were a giant tit. 99% of its history happened before social media yet somehow, suddenly, its basically become an internet byword for idiot.
[QUOTE=Kommodore;44674447]fox deliberately picks crazies for talk shows tbh it's been really fucked up watching this whole anti-feminist/feminist thing play out on the alternate reality of the internet and take on retarded proportions. feminism didnt used to be a dirty word unless you were a giant tit. 99% of its history happened before social media yet somehow, suddenly, its basically become an internet byword for idiot.[/QUOTE] The information age, ain't it beautiful? Where a legit cause fought by legit good people for decades can be thrown out the window and shit on by trending social media hash-tags.
Christ, that made my blood boil.
[QUOTE=DeVotchKa;44674031]women are far more materialistic and brag far more about their shiny shit than any man i've met.[/QUOTE] You ever been around a man who just got new kicks?
[QUOTE=MaxOfS2D;44674427]You shouldn't expect much more from Fox News' main channels, they'll just pit strawmen against straw(wo)men[/QUOTE] Most french TV is the same, they just find the dumbest fucks of each side and pit them against each other.
feminism should just go, it should be called equalism so it doesn't focus on one facet of the intolerance discussion I'm all for equality, I think anti-racism, feminism share a common goal, to see discrimination based on something ridiculous like skin tones or gender out of this society, because that kind of discrimination really is based on absolutely nothing. Therefore I think it should be called equalism because both movements strive towards equality.
[QUOTE=DeVotchKa;44674031]I can't stand feminists, they instantly go into screaming defense mode as soon as someone questions them or tells them they're wrong. Dude has an excellent point, we ARE taught to make girls happy no matter what. And yeah, men like their cars and golf clubs and shit but women are far more materialistic and brag far more about their shiny shit than any man i've met.[/QUOTE] Let's lump huge groups into homogenized pools and think we can label them all with the same trait because that isn't the backwards thinking that groups like feminists are trying to stop
[QUOTE=Recurracy;44674739]feminism should just go, it should be called equalism so it doesn't focus on one facet of the intolerance discussion I'm all for equality, I think anti-racism, feminism share a common goal, to see discrimination based on something ridiculous like skin tones or gender out of this society, because that kind of discrimination really is based on absolutely nothing. Therefore I think it should be called equalism because both movements strive towards equality.[/QUOTE] see i don't know if i'd trust someone who isn't aware of the existence of egalitarianism to dictate what feminism may or may not be. and the thing is that gender issues are very very closely intertwined, so much so that feminism helps fix them by proxy. so for example, you fix one issue for women (like the idea that they're intrinsically better parents, which puts pressure on them to act in certain ways), and then that affects men positively (so more perfectly decent male parents start getting custody of their kids in divorce cases). the deal is that feminists don't like those stereotypes any more than you do, so it's important that you understand that rectifying it is always the goal. with all this in mind i don't think the name is at all a big deal. just think of it as regular egalitarianism with a more specific goal.
We devote too much of our lives into our economic system to ever be happy. It's sad that the moment either happiness or money are brought up, it must coincide with the other. [QUOTE=Winner;44674351]so much sexist bullshit from both sides this isn't a debate it's shit-flinging[/QUOTE] Well once one side starts it, it's all over for all sides. Hah. [editline]29th April 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Fatfatfatty;44674387]Why is like all american TV-debates people screaming in eachothers faces[/QUOTE] Well, from what I can tell; most of the NA population lacks respect for one another. [editline]29th April 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Bynine;44675035]Let's lump huge groups into homogenized pools and think we can label them all with the same trait because that isn't the backwards thinking that groups like feminists are trying to stop[/QUOTE] They 'are trying to stop' it by both perpetuating and indulging in it all the same, yet they cannot for some reason see what they're doing. Everyone, male or female, becomes but a stooge when they're blinded by hate. And to be fair, about material possessions; I'd say [i]most[/i] advertisement is targeted toward females, probably for a number of reasons (one likely being that they are often seen as more social than their male counterparts). Advertisements are brainwashing, which goes on virtually anywhere you can see and/or hear. Their entire goal is "How can I make people think about [b]my[/b] product".
you guys don't watch fox news enough the lady isnt some progressive feminist shes a fox business host
Both of these people are sexists, neither are bringing up any good points and the immediacy with which this "debate" was led to ad hominem just shows that nobody in this video is qualified to be talking about serious issues on a public broadcast. If you think this is a good example of a feminist getting owned, then maybe you need to rethink what feminism is.
on what fucking planet are boys taught to make girls happy what the hell is that how does it feel to use fox news for confirmation bias you tools
[QUOTE=Fatfatfatty;44674387]Why is like all american TV-debates people screaming in eachothers faces[/QUOTE] why are all of your posts so bad
[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;44675441]on what fucking planet are boys taught to make girls happy what the hell is that how does it feel to use fox news for confirmation bias you tools[/QUOTE] I don't get what's so bad about it? Is it wrong for me to make a girl I love happy? Maybe I mistook the statement for something else.
[QUOTE=booster;44675538]I don't get what's so bad about it? Is it wrong for me to make a girl I love happy? Maybe I mistook the statement for something else.[/QUOTE] I believe it's the meaning of the statement. Assuming she is unhappy and she is reliant on you to make her happy.
[QUOTE=Joscpe;44675572]I believe it's the meaning of the statement. Assuming she is unhappy and she is reliant on you to make her happy.[/QUOTE] Oh, so the statement inclines that her only source of happiness would be from her man. If anyone still thinks this, it's a small minority, end shouldn't even be argument worthy. But this is FOX News so I'm not surprised.
This is the dumbest fucking video I've ever seen and no doubt will it just propagate more ignorance. Both sides of the argument or narrow minded and sexist against the other gender. This isn't "feminist gets owned". This is "dumb fucking women and dumb fucking man talk shit".
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.