It's amazing how easy it is to get gullible people to fall for lies just by linking to sources and then counting on no one actually reading them.
[QUOTE=Helix Snake;52450660]It's amazing how easy it is to get gullible people to fall for lies just by linking to sources and then counting on no one actually reading them.[/QUOTE]
I haven't watched this video yet but in the latest Sargon Of Akkad video on CNN blackmail at 1:08 he face plants so hard by saying "CNN said that Russians changed votes in the election machines" and then links to the article by CNN that says "Russians didn't change votes in the election machines".
He then takes clips from Project Veritas and doesn't even preface them with "Yeah I know, this source is bad but it fits in with my story" like he did in his video about the Syrian chemical attacks.
Later in the video he talks about how he's so reliable and that's why how he keeps his audience.
None of the comments call him out as far as I can see.
[QUOTE=01271;52450756]I haven't watched this video yet but in the latest Sargon Of Akkad video on CNN blackmail at 1:08 he face plants so hard by saying "CNN said that Russians changed votes in the election machines" and then links to the article by CNN that says "Russians didn't change votes in the election machines".
He then takes clips from Project Veritas and doesn't even preface them with "Yeah I know, this source is bad but it fits in with my story" like he did in his video about the Syrian chemical attacks.
Later in the video he talks about how he's so reliable and that's why how he keeps his audience.
None of the comments call him out as far as I can see.[/QUOTE]
He probably deletes the ones that do.
[QUOTE=01271;52450756]I haven't watched this video yet but in the latest Sargon Of Akkad video on CNN blackmail at 1:08 he face plants so hard by saying "CNN said that Russians changed votes in the election machines" and then links to the article by CNN that says "Russians didn't change votes in the election machines".
He then takes clips from Project Veritas and doesn't even preface them with "Yeah I know, this source is bad but it fits in with my story" like he did in his video about the Syrian chemical attacks.
Later in the video he talks about how he's so reliable and that's why how he keeps his audience.
None of the comments call him out as far as I can see.[/QUOTE]
Wish people like Sargon had the slightest shred of intellectual honesty and admit they were just fully bought-and-paid-for right-wing pundits.
[QUOTE=Mingebox;52450786]Wish people like Sargon had the slightest shred of intellectual honesty and admit they were just fully bought-and-paid-for right-wing pundits.[/QUOTE]
Youtube "rationalists" and "sceptics" are mostly anything but. Proper sceptics, such as Captain Disillusion of all people (aliens?), actually know what they're talking about and thoroughly explain ALL of their reasoning. Sargon and similar knobheads just spout the latest /pol/ memes (half of their sourcing will likely have been posted on some shit tier discussion board hours before), and insist they're being "logical" about it because they aren't following the "mainstream" viewpoints.
The Great Replacement being false is bad news for xenophiliacs. Why does no-one consider those that suffer from jungle/yellow fever? I myself have terminal cases of both yet my view is trampled by the current political scene.
This is the exact shit i believed in when I was basically fascist a few years ago and tbh it's pretty scary seeing run-of-the-mill conservatives going with it.
All I have to say is thanks for this video because nothing has summarised my grievances with the flood of new, revived insane and irrational radical-right ideas like this video has
White people are having less children than the unlimited number of people who are flooding into Europe. There's no way to work around the fact that statistically this means that Europeans will be a minority in their native countries by the end of this century, that's just basic math.
[QUOTE=Jack32;52452016]White people are having less children than the unlimited number of people who are flooding into Europe. There's no way to work around the fact that statistically this means that Europeans will be a minority in their native countries by the end of this century, that's just basic math.[/QUOTE]
Did you even watch the video?
[QUOTE=Jack32;52452016]White people are having less children than the unlimited number of people who are flooding into Europe. There's no way to work around the fact that statistically this means that Europeans will be a minority in their native countries by the end of this century, that's just basic math.[/QUOTE]
Basic math isn't what you need here, what you need here is statistics, which isn't exactly basic, and requires more brain cells than mindlessly shitting your racist fearmongering all over the internet.
[QUOTE=Jack32;52452016]White people are having less children than the unlimited number of people who are flooding into Europe. There's no way to work around the fact that statistically this means that Europeans will be a minority in their native countries by the end of this century, that's just basic math.[/QUOTE]
who cares though
[QUOTE=Jack32;52452016]White people are having less children than the [B]unlimited number of people[/B] who are flooding into Europe. There's no way to work around the fact that statistically this means that Europeans will be a minority in their native countries by the end of this century, that's just basic math.[/QUOTE]
Little known fact: Many people believe that the population of Earth is 7 billion and rapidly increasing, however the truth is that we're already at a total Earth population of Infinity.
[QUOTE=DiscoInferno;52452098]Little known fact: Many people believe that the population of Earth is 7 billion and rapidly increasing, however the truth is that we're already at a total Earth population of Infinity.[/QUOTE]
There are black men coming into my house and they don't stop coming. I think one of them is having sex with my wife right now
[QUOTE=Arc Nova;52452060]who cares though[/QUOTE]
reminds me of people who thought in the 60's that people of color would reduce the white population to a minority, taking over their jobs and families
same with mexicans in the 90's
and now its just brown people in general
I wonder who will be next?
[QUOTE=Naught;52452338]reminds me of people who thought in the 60's that people of color would reduce the white population to a minority, taking over their jobs and families
same with mexicans in the 90's
and now its just brown people in general
[B]I wonder who will be next?[/B][/QUOTE]
"Bad quality" whites
[QUOTE=Arc Nova;52452060]who cares though[/QUOTE]
the people becoming minorities in their own countries presumably?
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;52453174]the people becoming minorities in their own countries presumably?[/QUOTE]
What's wrong with being a minority?
Why does being white grant you ownership over the country you are born in?
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;52453174]the people becoming minorities in their own countries presumably?[/QUOTE]
Since when do majorities "own" a country?
What about the people who already ARE a minority in their "own" country?
Are you aware of the attrocious implications of your way of thinking?
[QUOTE=Spacewizard;52453288]What's wrong with being a minority?
Why does being white grant you ownership over the country you are born in?[/QUOTE]
A nation being indigenous to a region does not constitute ownership of that region? Interesting. I guess the colonialists really did do nothing wrong after all.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;52453174]the people becoming minorities in their own countries presumably?[/QUOTE]
Hold up, so much wrong with this post. First of, what's wrong with being a minority? Second of all, is the country the property of whatever "majority" there is or what do you even mean, does a country belong less to a person who is part of a minority than to a person who is part of the majority? Third of all why does any of this matter when we're working toward making society equal for everyone regardless of race or whatever?
[editline]10th July 2017[/editline]
[QUOTE=Laserbeams;52453487]A nation being indigenous to a region does not constitute ownership of that region? Interesting. I guess the colonialists really did do nothing wrong after all.[/QUOTE]
Come on dude, the geopolitical situation regarding indigenous people and rights and all that is a topic with more to it than you make it out to be. Why don't you try making a point and an argument that is a bit more straight forward and relevant?
[QUOTE=MrJazzy;52453504]Hold up, so much wrong with this post. First of, what's wrong with being a minority? Second of all, is the country the property of whatever "majority" there is or what do you even mean, does a country belong less to a person who is part of a minority than to a person who is part of the majority? Third of all why does any of this matter when we're working toward making society equal for everyone regardless of race or whatever?[/QUOTE]
Yeah, the majority does own the country. We have this whole thing called "democracy", and one of its fundamental flaws that the group with the most votes has more influence. That's why "majority" and "minority" are political terms to begin with
[QUOTE=MrJazzy;52453504]Come on dude, the geopolitical situation regarding indigenous people and rights and all that is a topic with more to it than you make it out to be. Why don't you try making a point and an argument that is a bit more straight forward and relevant?[/QUOTE]
People don't want to be minorities on their ancestral lands, that is as true for Germans as it is for a tiny, endangered tribe in the middle of the South American jungle
[QUOTE=Laserbeams;52453487]A nation being indigenous to a region does not constitute ownership of that region? Interesting. I guess the colonialists really did do nothing wrong after all.[/QUOTE]
this is a great strawman, show me where muslims and such are doing anything close to what colonialists did
[QUOTE=Naught;52453544]this is a great strawman, show me where muslims and such are doing anything close to what colonialists did[/QUOTE]
In case you're too dense to notice, we're talking about a hypothetical situation where the refugee crisis actually would be a threat to the people of Europe. As the video in the OP explains, that's not the case.
[QUOTE=Laserbeams;52453487]A nation being indigenous to a region does not constitute ownership of that region? Interesting. I guess the colonialists really did do nothing wrong after all.[/QUOTE]
This is circular logic
[editline]10th July 2017[/editline]
[QUOTE=Laserbeams;52453553]In case you're too dense to notice, we're talking about a hypothetical situation where the refugee crisis actually would be a threat to the people of Europe. As the video in the OP explains, that's not the case.[/QUOTE]
I thought we are talking about what actually is happening..?
Also I don#t get why you are using this tone.
Just a nitpick, but at 16:20 I think it's reasonable to assume that for example Poles (and EU citizens in general) may be more inclined to live in the UK temporarily, considering the EU makes it easy to move back and forth. I doubt many people immigrate from, say, Pakistan and aren't planning on staying more than a few years.
So in that sense that particular chart honestly works against him, because you can't just assume that all immigrants behave the same way.
[QUOTE=Killuah;52453593]This is circular logic[/QUOTE]
I'm not the best at debating, obviously, I have to work with what I've got
[QUOTE=Killuah;52453593]I thought we are talking about what actually is happening..?
Also I don#t get why you are using this tone.[/QUOTE]
It's obviously not happening, and Europeans are not becoming a minority. However, how can you disagree that it would be a problem if they actually were?
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;52453174]the people becoming minorities in their own countries presumably?[/QUOTE]
If being an ethnic minority is so bad maybe that's the problem we should strive to fix rather than try to maintain the status quo?
[QUOTE=Laserbeams;52453543]Yeah, the majority does own the country. We have this whole thing called "democracy", and one of its fundamental flaws that the group with the most votes has more influence. That's why "majority" and "minority" are political terms to begin with
People don't want to be minorities on their ancestral lands, that is as true for Germans as it is for a tiny, endangered tribe in the middle of the South American jungle[/QUOTE]
A democratic majority is an entirely different thing to an ethnic majority. I was obviously referring to one and not the other. Also maybe that's true, ppl don't like being a minority but that doesn't validate concern over ethnical purity.
[editline]10th July 2017[/editline]
[QUOTE=Laserbeams;52453619]I'm not the best at debating, obviously, I have to work with what I've got
It's obviously not happening, and Europeans are not becoming a minority. However, how can you disagree that it would be a problem if they actually were?[/QUOTE]
It's not a problem because it's a made up issue or at most a harmless phenomenon?
[editline]10th July 2017[/editline]
I mean your idea of what makes a European would have to be incredibly narrow and/or racist in order for Europeans to become a minority in Europe in any reasonable or non-reasonable time span.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
