[QUOTE=Nastardo;51227838][video=youtube;tydRQuzedy0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tydRQuzedy0[/video]
"OH NO!"[/QUOTE]
Man jesus christ how more obvious could you be.
Seems like they really got that problem at odd times,
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWqa2EIBAxY[/media]
This cannot be real lmao
"that sucks."
This election has been so sketchy
What is this, the Onion?
One of the reasons I hope Trump wins is that all these lefty biased, corrupt as fuck news outlets get blasted the fuck out for trying to cover up wikileak reveals about Clinton.
[QUOTE=Plaster;51227882]What is this, the Onion?[/QUOTE]
At this point cnn is less trustworthy than Onion.
At least Onion doesn't sensor its own journalists.
Yeah, CNN right now is basically RT for Clinton.
if there's one thing good to come from this election is that it's been a huge wakeup call for how unethical news is in the US
holy fuck, it's hard to believe this shit is actually real... fuck man, this is scary
CNN is biased for the left
who would have fucking guessed.
Good luck America
If America doesn't walk away from this election in an upheaval for news and journalism reform then I've fucking had it.
[QUOTE=jonoPorter;51227892]One of the reasons I hope Trump wins is that all these lefty biased, corrupt as fuck news outlets get blasted the fuck out for trying to cover up wikileak reveals about Clinton.[/QUOTE]
Then the left will from something worse then the tea party.
Damn, Assange wasn't exaggerating a single bit when he made that off-hand remark a few years ago that corruption in journalism goes to the very top. Wouldn't be surprised if any of those Podesta mails shows the media colluding a lot with the political status quo at this point.
The host's reaction seems to be one of genuine "holy shit, I can't believe the producer just did that, this is going to cause more shit"
This is why CNN gets called as a part of the "liberal media". It's a stupid term but it is honestly true just like Fox News is the right wing media.
If Assange was lying about all the info he has leaked why would the western governments and news corporations be trying to silence him so badly?
I feel like Bloomberg is the only station I can watch and have an ioda of hope they aren't as dirty.
CNN has been extensively covering the Podesta emails and the Wikileaks leaks at large, I don't see why they would go out of their way to cut Collins when he is just saying cookie cutter Republican rhetoric that they broadcast daily.
[QUOTE=Tudd;51227855]Seems like they really got that problem at odd times,[/QUOTE]
She came back on later and basically said the same thing, it was a genuine technical issue.
[QUOTE=LtKyle2;51227986]This is why CNN gets called as a part of the "liberal media". It's a stupid term but it is honestly true just like Fox News is the right wing media.
If Assange was lying about all the info he has leaked why would the western governments and news corporations be trying to silence him so badly?
I feel like Bloomberg is the only station I can watch and have an ioda of hope they aren't as dirty.[/QUOTE]
So many people shit talking Assange but to be fair we would be worse off as a civilization without people like him.
If not for people like that we would never be able to see through all this bullshit and politicians would always get off scott free for the dirty shit they pull, no body even knowing about it.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;51227991]
She came back on later and basically said the same thing, it was a genuine technical issue.[/QUOTE]
"You wanna keep your job? Say it was a genuine technical difficulty."
[QUOTE=Raidyr;51227991]CNN has been extensively covering the Podesta emails and the Wikileaks leaks at large, I don't see why they would go out of their way to cut Collins when he is just saying cookie cutter Republican rhetoric that they broadcast daily.
She came back on later and basically said the same thing, it was a genuine technical issue.[/QUOTE]
CNN obviously has a left wing bias, but we can probably believe its a technical thing here. From what I've watched, they've never cut off any Trump supporter by literally cutting the feed. Even dumbasses like Katrina Pierson, who no one wants to listen to, gets their full screen time (although she does get interrupted a lot by the other pundits), and what the guy was saying obviously wasn't going to be some super "reveal" or inflammatory thing against Clinton so it makes no sense to just cut him.
There's things to get mad about the media in terms of political bias, but this isn't one of them. Of course it'll be used as "Watch C(linton) News Network Silence Freedom of Speech of Trump Supporter."
[QUOTE=Raidyr;51227991]CNN has been extensively covering the Podesta emails and the Wikileaks leaks at large, I don't see why they would go out of their way to cut Collins when he is just saying cookie cutter Republican rhetoric that they broadcast daily.
She came back on later and basically said the same thing, it was a genuine technical issue.[/QUOTE]
It's always fun with CNN doing their coverage of Wikileaks.
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DcATG9Qy_A[/media]
Though seriously on the other thing, I have honestly never been able to find any recording of her making those points later.
[QUOTE=markfu;51228023]CNN obviously has a left wing bias, but we can probably believe its a technical thing here. From what I've watched, they've never cut off any Trump supporter by literally cutting the feed. Even dumbasses like Katrina Pierson, who no one wants to listen to, gets their full screen time (although she does get interrupted a lot by the other pundits), and what the guy was saying obviously wasn't going to be some super "reveal" or inflammatory thing against Clinton so it makes no sense to just cut him.
There's things to get mad about the media in terms of political bias, but this isn't one of them. Of course it'll be used as "Watch C(linton) News Network Silence Freedom of Speech of Trump Supporter."[/QUOTE]
I think this has to do with him mentioning wikileaks, which CNN seems to really fucking want people to not look at.
[QUOTE=Tudd;51228024]It's always fun with CNN doing their coverage of Wikileaks.[/QUOTE]
Shitpost at will but it doesn't contradict my point that CNN has had numerous people the entire campaign from the right talking about how Wikileaks makes Clinton look bad. There is zero reason for them to purposefully cut Collins here.
[QUOTE=Tudd;51228024]Though seriously on the other thing, I have honestly never been able to find any recording of her making those points later.[/QUOTE]
So she is lying?
[QUOTE=DiBBs27;51227996]
"You wanna keep your job? Say it was a genuine technical difficulty."[/QUOTE]
I don't know if she said it was a genuine technical difficulty. She did make the same comments several times later while live.
[editline]19th October 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=AaronM202;51228041]I think this has to do with him mentioning wikileaks, which CNN seems to really fucking want people to not look at.[/QUOTE]
One person said something stupid != CNN who, as I have already said, has extensively covered Wikileaks every time they emerge.
Yeah I doubt the producers are stupid enough to be this blatant on purpose.
[media]https://youtu.be/d4YQ6n9_y8E[/media]
CNN should work on their "oh no that sucks :(" speech
[QUOTE=Tudd;51228024]Though seriously on the other thing, I have honestly never been able to find any recording of her making those points later.[/QUOTE]
Why would someone make a youtube video of that? I don't know if it happened or not, but its easy to be selective about stuff like this.
We have to keep an eye out for not only media bias, but then the subsequent bias of the people who make these youtube videos to prove bias. Basically bias on top of bias. Layered, like an onion.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;51228044]Shitpost at will but it doesn't contradict my point that CNN has had numerous people the entire campaign from the right talking about how Wikileaks makes Clinton look bad. There is zero reason for them to purposefully cut Collins here.
So she is lying?
I don't know if she said it was a genuine technical difficulty. She did make the same comments several times later while live.
[/QUOTE]
You would hope I get banned for shitposting, but I am just poking fun at CNN for the most part.
I just think it is silly for you to demand from others all the time, but when you say there was a point that Brianna Keilar got on and got to make her point we can't produce anything.
Also CNN's has covered Wikileaks and I won't deny that, but they are still obviously a left bias news source.
[editline]19th October 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=Socram;51228109]Why would someone make a youtube video of that? I don't know if it happened or not, but its easy to be selective about stuff like this.
We have to keep an eye out for not only media bias, but then the subsequent bias of the people who make these youtube videos to prove bias. Basically bias on top of bias. Layered, like an onion.[/QUOTE]
I get that completely, but if she went back on live several times and made the same point, surely it's not ridiculous to expect someone would record those parts too in hopes to prove the CNN bias accusation is wrong.
[QUOTE=Tudd;51228116]
I just think it is silly for you to demand from others all the time, but when you say there was a point that Brianna Keilar got on and got to make her point we can't produce anything.[/QUOTE]
I didn't say that, she said that, and in lieu of any evidence to the contrary I wouldn't rush to call her a liar as you are.
[QUOTE=Tudd;51228116]Also CNN's has covered Wikileaks and I won't deny that, but they are still obviously a left bias news source.[/QUOTE]
What news source isn't obviously left bias.
[QUOTE=Tudd;51228116]I get that completely, but if she went back on live several times and made the same point, surely it's not ridiculous to expect someone would record those parts too in hopes to prove the CNN bias accusation is wrong.[/QUOTE]
No that is actually quite ridiculous. No one archives CNN footage specifically to prove conspiracy theorists wrong, nor should they.
[editline]19th October 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=ThurnisHaley;51228094]
CNN should work on their "oh no that sucks :(" speech[/QUOTE]
Again, another genuine technical issue. She was being told that the interview was going to have to be wrapped up because the satellite window was closing but she didn't want to cut him off. Watson tweeted later thanks for the interview and appeared on CNN numerous times afterwards.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.