Why do they feel the need to call it a "relationship"?
Because its a boy and not a girl.
Makes a lot of sense
this has literally never been a problem on FP unless you go back YEARS
a similar news story came out very recently and i remember it being very civil with only 1 or 2 weirdos
13 year olds are not very smart, so there's no way the kid could understand what he was getting into.
Her husband must be devastated by this, it's one thing to be cheated on but I can't imagine how it would feel to find out that not only is your wife sleeping with someone else, that person is a child.
Every single one of these threads I've seen has had plenty of bans from "nice" be it plaintext or a South park clip. I'm surprised the last thread had so few, actually.
Discussing it before it has even happened isn't productive, you're probably more likely to just encourage people who want to get a rise out of you.
I personally don't care, if people want to get themselves banned over a dumb unfunny joke that's been made a million times, that's their prerogative. I'm just saying it's never *not* been a problem.
One time my ex emailed me about banging her underage cousin to try to make me jealous and I've hated her disgusting guts since
If you quote satire without recognizing it as such, then who's the joke?
I know this is technically rape and I hate being that guy but I'm just thinking back to when I was a horny 13 year old, I would have jumped at the opportunity to sleep with a pretty, older woman. Surely the whole double standard exists for a reason, probably to do as much with differences in male physiology along with cultural gender norms. Not saying that boys cannot be taken advantage of, but I would imagine this case blowing up and him having to deal with police and so on will traumatise him more than sleeping with his teacher has.
It's not "technically" rape. It's just rape. A grown-ass adult woman taking advantage of a "horny 13 year old" if that was the case, is still an adult exploiting a child. The idea that the authorities getting involved would be more awful than getting raped (and yes, even if it didn't seem that way at the time) is an enormous part of the entire problem with female-on-male pedophilia to begin with.
Why do people feel the temptation to do something so immorally wrong? I feel like the people who say things like "lucky" are only normalizing an issue that should be taken with as much seriousness as possible. You're supposed to teach kids, not exploit their trust and young developing minds for your own, undoubtedly sinister as hell purposes. Male, female, doesn't give a shit in my eyes of the law.
"Satire is a sort of glass wherein beholders do generally discover everybody’s face but their own"
Okay, you explain why you need any sort of intelligence to have a sexual relationship.
Fall in love, have sex, it's not rocket science.
That's not the point, the point is having a responsible relationship. Any relationship between a 13 year old and an adult is not a responsible relationship by definition.
Because you need to know what type of situation you're in. A 13 year old doesn't have enough life experience to know much about relationships. Someone that age can make a lot more errors than an adult.
Just because you feel urges does not mean you act on those urges. Basic civil human existence. By that same metric are you implying bestiality is kosher if the person loves their animal? Like are you trying to argue for the pedophile's case here or what?
I'd say young boys' general willingness to engage in a relationship with an adult just makes them easier to take advantage of for said adult. Doesn't make it any less terrible for the adult to be doing it though, imo.
This woman's going to jail for following her emotions, will never be able to do her job again, and is probably going to be ostracised for the rest of her life.
Her boyfriend's gonna be heartbroken by the knowledge of that and everyone around him is gonna give him weird looks and/or try to drum into him how the person he's in love with is a horrible person who's been selfishly abusing him.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that this way he might very well end up traumatised and feeling like, well, a sexual abuse victim for the rest of his life. And that he probably wouldn't have minded at all otherwise.
And this stuff came to light because his parents had been spying on his private communications.
But sure, they're the heroes here, because think of what errors this irresponsible 13 year old could've made otherwise! Now that would've really ruined his life!
Humans can't know for sure what an animal wants. We can make pretty good guesses about our pets but that's not 100%.
But a 13 year old you can talk to, and in this case I see nothing to suggest the kid was being forced into anything.
You probably shouldn't try and make this point in a thread about someone having sex with a THIRTEEN-year-old.
what the fuck lol
Ok lol you're probably just trolling but, on the off chance you aren't, let me just go beat-for-beat on this astoundingly awful post.
This woman is going to jail because she fucked a fucking child. She not only cheated on her boyfriend but she took advantage of a child. I sincerely hope she never becomes a teacher and is ostracized for the rest of her life. Why are you trying to defend this woman? Would you be making this same argument if it was a man who fucked a 13 year old girl who was just "following his emotions"?
Yes, her boyfriend is likely traumatized and will be fucked up about this for a long time. That is expressly the woman's fault for being a fucking pedophile. Are you seriously meaning to imply this would have been better off swept under the rug and he would be better off ignorant? Even aside from the awful, awful context of the greater situation, are you of the mind that people who get cheated on are better off ignorant rather than breaking it off with the person cheating on them? If so, that is an absolutely terrible fucking thought process and will do irreparable damage to people's emotions. I sincerely hope you never give anyone relationship advice.
The child will be feeling like a sexual abuse victim for the rest of his life? Gee, I wonder why that is. Is it perhaps because he fucking was a sexual abuse victim? 13 years of age is considered childhood/early adolescence by a great many number of cultures and countries. Topically, in north america it is definitively a state of legally recognized childhood. The entire reason pedophilia is maligned (rightfully so) is because children may feel attachment or attraction or romantic urges to other people who are significantly older, but this relationship will always be exploitative because as children they do not have worldly experience enough to know their own feelings thoroughly and at the age of 13 are most definitely not sexually mature enough for something like a sexual relationship with a fully adult woman. An adult pressing themselves onto a child is, no matter the context, inherently non-consensual because as a grown-ass adult with a firm and matured worldview it is very easy to coerce and manipulate the feelings of an immature person like say, a 13 year old, misusing authority and respect (the kind which, say, a teacher might have over a student) to further manipulate them. Maybe he wouldn't have minded otherwise at the time, maybe not, but the fact remains that an adult cannot simply hide behind the defense of consent in the case of having sexual relations with children because their consent means very little when, again, they are not fully developed human beings. It is the exact same reason children/young teenagers are not penalized to the full extent of the law when they commit crimes. They do not carry a mature understanding of the world. Just because they say yes, does not in this instance quantify as meaningful consent, especially considering all the above-mentioned factors of a student-teacher power inequality. 13 year olds have sexual experiences, yes, but usually with other people around their age, which is a night and day difference. I genuinely hoped nobody would have to explain this in this thread, but lo and behold.
I really hope my efforts here were wasted on a troll. Otherwise I will have to accept the reality that people still carry opinions like these in 2018.
I mean, "13 year olds are not very smart" is just a really damn stupid thing to say.
Maybe "most 13 year olds are not very smart", or perhaps "this kid is not very smart for getting in a relationship with his teacher", that's probably accurate. But last time I checked 13 year olds are not identical, and making such a blanket statement makes you look pretty stupid, ironically.
Even if the kid wanted it and wasn't traumatized at all, the potential for abuse and trauma due to the power dynamic between an adult and a child would be enough for it to be a crime on its own.
You shouldn't make anyone, let alone a child, feel obligated to have sex. This could be worse with boys because they might feel like refusing would mean they're not masculine.
By 'following her emotions', she put this boy into a situation where he had to keep this massive secret from everybody forever, including his parents. At 13, you need to be able to talk honestly to your parents and others you trust. Can you imagine the pressure of carrying around a secret that could put someone you care about in jail if you let something slip? And not only that, but cause a massive shitstorm that would affect everybody you interact with on a daily basis? That is the situation this 13 year old boy has been in. I also find it a little strange that you don't at all question the teacher's intentions when she used her job to commit a serious crime. She's a literal criminal who abused her position for her crimes. She could just as well have been actively harming the boy (and possibly others), how can you suggest that such a suspicion should just have been ignored, on the off chance that "he probably won't mind"?
Loving these threads. Bring out the same Child Molester as always.
do you understand the concept of the age of consent?
like cmon
Except most 13 year olds aren't that smart. There's a reason 18 is the go to age for legalizing recognizing people as adults. And the brain isn't fully developed until about 25.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.