• Syria Myths "exposed" by Journalist at the UN (Eva Bartlett)
    7 replies, posted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1VNQGsiP8M
There are several things in her perspective that are not so cool. For example the thing on "sources on the ground" is very one sided and a bit weird. Saying the guy in the UK is only "one guy" is a bit ...strnge since this guy is citing sources from within Syria. And there is lots like this in her points. Lots of half truths that she spins by not telling the whole story.
Could you provide a source of the video released by "In the NOW"? I'm genuinely interested to know if it's the same video rather than simply being clipped from the one released on the UN's own website. In any case, I don't think where it came from matters all that much compared it's content. I'm also not sure it's unfair to state that it was "at the UN" if the press conference was held within the rooms of the Syrian mission at the UN. The full video can be found here.
Where content comes from is greatly important to the content itself. This is like, a cornerstone, of verifying a piece of information for Christs sake. If the video is sourced from somewhere of ill repute (RT, Fox News, fuckin Project Veritas, etc.) then the video probably shouldn't be trusted as these sources have a history of outright manipulating content posted to lie and spin it in their favour.
It's not from a source of ill repute however, it's a video clipped from another video from the UN's own website, that is the point I was making. In this case, the source of the second video is irrelevant.
https://www.facebook.com/inthenow/videos/729126400571065/
Does this twitter feed look like a neutral Journalist to you?
Never thought I would see people claiming crisis actors on a geopolitical scale
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.