Bolton: U.S. sanctions 'possible' on European firms over Iran
21 replies, posted
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-bolton/u-s-sanctions-possible-on-european-companies-doing-business-with-iran-bolton-idUSKCN1IE0M9
Can you guys remove him and stop him from getting everyone a nuclear war
When the party of fiscal responsibility is willing to fuck up the economy and get out of the Iran deal because Obama did it.
When you sanction everyone, you just sanction yourself
Sanctioning European allies before Russia: A+
The pettiest presidency that ever was.
All this could have been avoided if Obama changed his name to Barry Osborn
nothing screams "tough guy" more than threatening your century old allies because they didn't join your quest to destabilise the middle east (again)
I really hope you guys manage to get rid of Trump before the EU/UK-US alliance gets completely crushed by his administration.
Apparently Bolton wants to go to war with the entire fucking Planet.
Does he think Europe won't respond with sanctions on the United States? I think Europe is getting tired of our shit, they may actually do it...
With Trump at the helm, I think America can probably be considered a rogue state right now, so sanctions are likely going to be inevitable. If not now, soon enough, because Donnie isn't going to stop burning bridges until he runs out of bridges or he's run out of office.
It's great knowing that once US gets a sane person in the office again, they'll be spending most of the time repairing the country and relations with other countries instead of truly progressing forward.
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/2304/b17f1a43-c05a-49a9-bd1d-742818dc29b8/image.png
Точно как и планировалось ...
I wonder if Trump's intention is to start a war to hide away from the Mueller investigation and because North Korea is now supposedly cooperating for peace, he has to pick some other country to pick a fight with. What better than Iran?
I never put much stock in the whole "Trump is going to start a war to protect his presidency" idea but the administrations vague and contradictory stance toward Iran, the deal, and the possibility of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East is concerning.
He's obsessed with a lot of shit he's said in the 2016 campaign, like he has to prove he was right or something. Guess what foreign country he liked talking about in 2016.
Also, to add to this, and then when the next elections roll around, the opposing side will be flooding the media and the public with messages about how President XYZ is ineffectual and unable to deliver any competent reforms and changes to advance the country -- because they've been busy trying to bring the country back to where it started before Trump.
It's the Republican strategy of starting fires and letting successor Democrats put them out, with Russian-made fuel injection to kick it up to 11.
This is my prediction if Iran just decides to stop abiding by the deal. The next Democrat president in 2020 or 2024 (if we get to have democratic elections in 2024) will have to deal with a nuclear arms race in the middle east and catch shit from Fox News before they are even inaguarated for being "weak on Iran".
It's two birds with one stone. Obama also fixed the economy, so they've gotta fuck it up somehow.
We're way past "because Obama did it" at this point. This is driving a wedge between the US and the EU, stopping Iran from drifting Westward, and driving up oil prices. I can think of someone who might want these things.
Doubt it. He's A. a democrat and B. black. Fox was going to tear him apart regardless.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.