https://youtu.be/_WAnEmDiA5A
Honestly, the biggest surprise to me here that there hasnt been a game called "world war three" before
Is World War 1 and 2 good? What are they about?
Has the potential to be interesting but could easily go either way. I'll wait for the full trailer.
On a serious note, why do the Russians and US gotta fight? I want a game where they're on the same side for once.
But there is?
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/527/bf78e841-1792-4a9a-a339-c36e27a1c78f/maxresdefault.jpg
Who are they gonna fight? There's not a whole lot on this world that count stand against the US and Russian military if they were united. Unless you mean them fighting aliens or something?
That'd be Call of Duty: Modern Warfare. It's a small, obscure indie game but they work together. It goes to shit in the next game though.
Looking it up the game is multiplayer only, featuring Battle Royale and a large scale team-based battle game.
is this like a reboot of world war 2?
https://i.imgur.com/n7lZQst.png
Ah yes, the extra-zoomed-in-version of the US flag where it just shows a single red and a single white bar, combined with the star-circle of the Betsy Ross flag.
TBH the EU is a stronger ally to the US than Russia ever will be. Just simply from manpower and technology.
You could make some civil war spinoff game, it'd be very easy to justify US and Russia fighting together against France and CSA.
You know, like imagine if gettysburg armored warfare had been developed by competent developers ;(
Already looks better than anything Battlefield or Call of Duty are bringing to the table this year.
Imagine falling for teaser hype
Did we watch the same video? Because all I saw were 5 seconds of pre-rendered cutscenes that could have been from any military game from the past 10 years.
That's also what we've seen from Battlefield and CoD, and this did do it better, so he's not technically incorrect.
However, info that it's a Battle Royale game then disproves it.
I'm really not seeing how this did it "better", there's just a bunch of soldiers with advanced gear walking through a ruined city. Did I seriously miss something?
It's generic as fuck and really boring to look at, but at least it's not the trailer for the new Battlefield.
...
I unironically thought about what game this was sequel to for a few seconds
They may be NRF, but NATO is basically synonymous with the US in WW3 scenarios.
China and North Korea. US and Russia vs literally everyone else. Aliens could work too. Maybe make up some sci-fi shit where some country gets an army of bots somehow faster than the US/Russia. You know how fiction works right?
It is literally fucking Poland though. The actual fucking Polish flag is clearly shown. He wears a Polish uniform. He wields a Polish rifle.
You have to be incredibly dense to think that NATO fighting Russia doesn't involve the US fighting Russia too. Like it's not a hard thing to figure out.
There's Hotline Miami
You mean the game where the US and Soviets are fighting a proper war in Hawaiian islands?
After that the US becomes a puppet state of the Soviets, which is the whole reason for the events of the games
Realistically, yes. Of course. However, so far, the trailer has only shown Poland, and you're already whining about the US being the only faction in every game. Maybe this game is going in another direction?
I kind of associate that with being a few years old now.
I hope it continues the story from the last one
World Ware
Do I have to play World War 1 or World War 2 to understand World War 3 guys?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
