Dude can’t even get Chick-fil-A to give his wife a job, wtf can we expect him to do here.
He won't cause any actual harm guys they said, the senate and the house will keep him in check they said
I'm just so tired of hearing about this blatant bullshit being perpetuated day in and out by trump and his gang of racketeers, and wondering if he'll end up ousted from office at all any time soon before we regress all the way back to the height of the industrial revolution.
Trump states The Jungle is bullshit and the muckrakers were liars—doubles down on deregulating meat industry
Let's hope there's a nasty, undignified end waiting for every one of these fuckers.
Sentiment is rising that checks on Trump are needed.
A new NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll suggests this might be the case. It finds that Democrats lead among registered voters nationally in the House generic ballot matchup by 50 percent to 40 percent.
But even more tellingly, the poll finds that by a whopping margin of 48-23, voters are more likely to support a congressional candidate who promises to be a check on Trump. And by 53-31, they are less likely to vote for a candidate who has supported Trump’s positions more than 90 percent of the time.
[...] According to the good folks at NBC, who sent over these numbers, in those districts:
By 52-19, voters in competitive House districts are more likely to support a congressional candidate who promises to be a check on Trump.
By 55-28, voters in competitive House districts are more likely to support a congressional candidate who has opposed Trump most of the time.
[...] in a whole lot of competitive seats mostly held by Republicans, majorities are more likely to vote for the candidate who will act as a check on Trump and will oppose him on most of his policies.
Let's hope the midterms don't deliver a lot of concerned-but-idle Republicans, blue wave or not.
Y'know, for an administration not supposed to have any ties with Putin's government at all whatsoever I think it's continually fascinating just how often their decisions have conveniently beneficial effects for Putin's government
Not this one, though
I mean, it would be if Russia were something like one of the last and largest remaining asbestos producers on the planet with a vested economic interest in downplaying its ill effects and seeing it gain more ground in an international market
Wait shit
Is Pruitt's secret TOR at the EPA literally "Don't do anything that might actually help the environment, or for that matter, don't help the American people either"? In return Trump will turn a blind eye to him running it like his own private Lordship staff?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
