Ex-Trump aide pushes for Hope Hicks: Trump will "listen to women more than men" - Polidicks

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/395107-ex-trump-campaign-aide-trump-will-listen-to-women-more-than-men President Trump’s former campaign aide said ex-White House communications director Hope Hicks would be the perfect choice for chief of staff because Trump will “listen to women more than men.” Sam Nunberg appeared on MSNBC on Sunday and suggested that Hicks might be returning to the White House if current chief of staff John Kelly leaves this summer, Mediaite reported. “She is exactly perfect for what the president is looking for,” Nunberg told MSNBC’s Alex Witt. “He is thinking about not having a chief of staff." Trump wants to operate the White House like his business headquartered in Trump Tower in New York, Nunberg said."What he wants is to operate like the 26th floor of Trump Tower where he had a strong-willed, very good woman in Rhona Graff handling the calls, knowing him, getting his zen, things like that," Nunberg said. “He will listen to women more than men — believe it or not — sternly saying ‘this is not a good idea,’ ” Nunberg added. Nunberg said Hicks wouldn’t be “insulted” like Kelly currently is when Trump goes against her advice.Nunberg’s comments come days after reports that Kelly could leave his role sometime this summer. The White House denied the report on Thursday but Trump implied that Hicks would return to his administration in some role. "I love Hope. She's great. I hope that — I've been hearing little things like that," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, according to a CNN producer. Wouldn't have expected that.

He doesn't listen to then when they say "Please don't touch me".

Has Trump been found guilty of sexually assaulting a woman? That line would have worked if we were talking about good ole Bill.

I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything.

TL;DR: Trump listens to his dick more then his brain.

why is it always you

Is there no difference between criminal sexual assault and bragging that women LET you touch them?

Sure - he was also sued for sexual assault (read: rape). Ivana testified to it under oath that he did so and has never denied that she didn't testify that. Additionally, he bragged about walking into Miss USA contest dressing rooms to specifically see women in a state of undress - he is a self-admitted voyeur, which is also a crime.

"it's ok the women allowed him to touch them" doesn't make sense when if they didn't there is a chance they lose their whole career

Both are terrible in their own special way.

Oh God not another one of these guys

The "good ol bill" was almost certainly a bait and switch move so he could troll about Bill Clinton sexual assaulting and then when pressed on it go "I meant Bill Cosby"

nice whataboutism but its 2018 not 1998. trump has at least 3 active court cases accusing him of sexual assault or threatening a woman's life and about a half dozen more in the works.

Does he even know who Trump is?

Grabbing someone's genitals without prior permission is sexual assault you stupid fucking moron.

and now here comes the part where you never post again in this thread, after being thoroughly disproven, and we wait for you to pipe up somewhere else

Yeah it was awful when Clinton did it, too, your point. Why is this a "gotcha"

Actually arguably what Bill Clinton did was way way better than fucking Donald Trump. Bill Clinton just got a blowjob, a completely consensual one, and lied about it. Trump lies every single day, especially about the women he sexually assaulted. Bill Clinton is not at all comparable to Donald Trump, it's just conservatives blew Bill Clinton's ONE scandal out of the water to try and gain points in the public's eyes.

There is a question to be had of just how consensual Bill's sexual encounter could have been as she was an intern of his thus he had the ability to coerce consent. But at the same time he didn't peep through clothing racks in dressing rooms, and unlike at least one of the women who Trump assaulted Monica was at least older than 13 when it happened.

Also Monica Lewinsky isn't the only thing that ralgoman is referencing

Ehhhhh Clinton isn't innocent. Did he openly brag about how he can just "grab them by the pussy" like Trump? As far as we know, he thankfull hasn't. But: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegations The Monica Lewinsky scandal basically covered everything else up when it became so high profile, so "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" and him cheating on Hilary and lying under oath became much louder than him sexually harassing multiple women. Lewinsky is even saying now in retrospect, she wasn't so sure if she felt coerced or really consented. As well, Clinton doesn't believe he owes her an apology, at all, nor would he have done anything differently could he have.