North Korea agrees to close missile site, says Moon
11 replies, posted
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-45569924
North Korea speaks to the Moon - he clearly is best Korea:
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/242634/ec2c0ce9-553d-436c-8f2b-c5b81ffc38aa/image.png
But seriously - this may be a move forward. I hold my judgement for now, as North Korea only care about continuing the regime. They're an example of what happens with technology and complete control of a civilian population with propaganda.
just do it already
Lol, didn't they already make this promise?
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/34B0/production/_103488431_4ce90fca-4cce-4d5c-8cc7-619f81a0c7d0.jpg
Rare photo captures the moment seconds before a Trump jumps into the frame shouting "ME! ME! ME!"
This just seems symbolic to me, North Korea already has road-mobile TELs designed so they don't need a static launch site, it's unknown if they're functional but it's possible they are
TELs I assume are SRBMs though, not ICBMs? I don't know much on it, so you'll have to educate me.
North Korea supposedly has silos.
Long-range ICBMs have been deployed on road-mobile launchers before, and what NK TELs have been displayed appear to be carrying missiles in the intercontinental weight class (Hwasong-15)
Plus it's worth noting that NK doesn't necessarily need to be able to hit the CONUS to deter the US - they can just as easily fire a missile at Guam, Okinawa, south Korea or Japan
That's true, but they'd make certain their annihilation into little pieces by the US and Trump would presumably get a Nobel Peace Prize if the previous rulings are anything to go on.
they already have a variety of srbm and mrbms, their icbm isn't really anything but a larger version so mobile launchers seem well within their technology. Plus they could also just stick up a missile site somewhere else and say its not because that's all we can do at this point.
That's the entire point of NK's nuclear arsenal, they are using them to deter foreign intervention/regime change by making such a venture far too costly for the powers that may do it, and with the use of TELs and SSBs they are trying to ensure that a first strike, conventional or nuclear, will never completely destroy their nuclear capability
North Korea is like a drug addict that the international community keeps mistakenly welcoming back into the house every time he promises that he's off heroin for good this time. Then, you come back from a long weekend at the beach to find that he's stolen all the spare change he could find, hawked his mother's jewelry, taken any pill in the medicine cabinet he could, and left his dirty needles on the bathroom floor. Then, in exactly one year we repeat the process
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.