Trump administration halts study ‘to discover a cure for HIV’
37 replies, posted
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/trump-administration-halts-study-that-was-using-fetal-tissue-to-discover-a-cure-for-hiv/2018/12/09/954fec2a-fbcd-11e8-83c0-b06139e540e5_story.html
The Trump administration has shut down at least one government-run study that uses fetal tissue implanted into mice even before federal health officials reach a decision on whether to continue such research, which is opposed by antiabortion groups.
A senior scientist at a National Institutes of Health laboratory in Montana told colleagues that the Health and Human Services Department “has directed me to discontinue procuring fetal tissue” from a firm that is the only available source, according to an email he sent to a collaborator in late September.
“This effectively stops all of our research to discover a cure for HIV,” the researcher wrote.
Is the Trump administration made up of an Alien race hellbent on exterminating humanity?
I call bullshit on that. Most likely lobbying by pharmaceutical companies are behind this.
The use of fetal tissue is an affront to Christianity, the admin might go after the scientific supplier too.
Spending taxpayer money, helping the gays and using fetal stem cells? Shutting down something like this is a Republican politician's wet dream.
Just like Reagan and Bush Sr, he doesn't care about HIV.
HIV is the gay disease. If they didn't want to catch it, they shouldn't have been gay.
Unrelated (slightly dated) article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/06/us/rural-indiana-struggles-to-contend-with-hiv-outbreak.html
Last month, the thin, 45-year-old woman learned the unforgiving consequences. She tested positive for H.I.V., one of nearly 150 cases in this socially conservative, largely rural region just north of the Kentucky border. Now a life long hobbled by addiction is, like so many others here, consumed by fear.
She is afraid to start antiretroviral therapy because she does not want to be spotted entering the clinic on Main Street, she says, and afraid to learn her prognosis after hearing a rumor — false, it turns out — that someone else with the virus was given six months to live. Other drug users have refused to be tested at all.
“I thought it was just a homosexual disease,” the woman said one recent evening, twisting a tissue in her manicured hands as tears filled her eyes. She asked that her name not be published out of concerns about being stigmatized. “I didn’t ever think it would be in my small hometown.”
“I thought it was just a homosexual disease,” the woman said one recent evening
You'd have to be pretty massively ignorant to think ONLY gays could get it
this is what inaction causes
Every day, making me more proud to share a border with your country.
Hurry up and remove this orange fuck from office
Mike Pence isn't going to be an improvement when it comes to social policy. If both get removed then I would hate to see Nancy Pelosi as president.
HIV is a threat to mankind, if you have the power to halt the progress of a cure on the disease, then to me you are betraying your own species and that should be criminal.
What's even more absurd is the same people who think this probably also think that being gay is a choice that you can pray or electrocute away. So basically something that boils down to mere preference in their eyes also makes you more susceptible to a certain disease? Like - what? No wonder these doofs stigmatize the disease, they probably also buy into the line that being gay automatically locks you out of heaven simply because "boys kissing boys, eww".
Trust me, if there was a disease that affected someone more or less depending on what they liked or disliked, it'd have been friggin' weaponized by now.
Letting nature take its course for people who get HIV is #winning, apparently.
Butt he held the flag!11!
an alien race called fundamental christians. bush set us back 10 years thanks to the same exact religiously driven nonsensical ban, now medicines have advanced even further and this sort of model is the only way to test these things so we're now even further set back.
You've got to be fucking delusional or just love needlessly equivocating if you honestly think having the most productive Speaker of the House in decades as president would be anywhere near as bad as Trump or Pence
I'd rather see Nancy than any current Republican be president.
Standard scaremongering here, as per usual.
Pelosi isn't in the same ballpark as these scum sucking vermin, don't equate them.
Its intersting to play the "guess the tread title" game for Trump threads, when these titles get cut off on my phone.
"Halts study to find cure for...." and then you tlrack your brain to think of the worst possible outcome, the single most stupid and shortsighted thing, and tgen you're probably right.
This is the same garbage mindset that helped cost Hilary the election.
Yeah, I get it, the democratic members aren't ideal. Yes, there's room for improvement, and yes, I would love for some ideal candidate to pop out.
However I'm not going to pass up going "hmmm naaah" for them and be apathetic about it and just let Republicans get more power.
I mean jfc I still meet people who say "hmm yeah trump is bad but I'd never have Hilary" and people will one day be saying the same about Pelosi and holy fuck are you and these people so dense that you don't realize how cancerous the GOP is to not only American society, but the world itself?
I don't fucking care how icky or "just another politician" those people are, because they aren't advocating for harm to the world. And people keep fucking forgetting about that.
It's not about "hmmm but we need someone good in office." No, absolutely-fucking-not. We're looong past the point of "differing in fundamental ideals" and now to the point of result is genuinely oppressing demographics and ruining the world.
Like I'm butthurt just at you even considering mentioning "hmm hate to see Pelosi as president." In a thread that shoves the fact in your face that the GOP is choosing to stop progress on curing a horrible disease that was an epidemic a few decades ago. It's considerably murder, that pretty much any non-GOP is miles away from.
So, yes, I would love to see Pelosi in the Oval Office. And then after that, after we fix all the disasters that the Republicans caused, we can work on voting out the Democrats we don't want, either. We can vote in someone better than Pelosi.
The woman in that article contacted HIV through sharing needles, but the point still stands.
To be fair, sex Ed would cover needles in it, either way
Pelosi sucks, Trump and Pence are down right fucking evil.
I'll take sucks.
what would be so bad about nancy pelosi as president, truly?
Well she has ovaries so we can expect Republicans to obstruct and conduct sham investigations into everything she does.
You know AIDS used to be called GRID, right? Gay-Related Immune Deficiency? That used to be the official name like, thirty years ago. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if Trump still calls it that. That's probably why funding is getting cut.
besides her age, removed from the house she'd probably flip hard centrist.
Okay, I don't like Pelosi a whole lot as a person
But as a politiican, she's been remarkably progressive for her time in office.
The idea that she'd just suddenly flip to a position she's never really publicly held in office, is kind of, well, baffling to me?
its probably more distrust of her than anything. its just her whole class of democrats have a terrible track record in my eyes. I think part of her was glad to help the progressive caucus but at the same time she needed to prevent another freedom caucus so she aquiesssed to their demands.
I bet in 5 years, the fanatacism about OAC will die down as she will have had to make pragmatic decisions and shed some idealism in that time frame
So in that vein, I find it hard to genuinely hate politicians like Pelosi, who has done many things I disagree with, but still represents a genuine progressive position for many years.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.