The man in the oval office makes Benedict Arnold sound like the definition of loyalty.
'may' and 'has' have been the issue, the gop wouldn't investigate 'may', and will be very reluctant to impeach on 'has'
even the mueller findings will be spun as his entire campaign conspiring to do something illegal but he didn't do anything
You dont say?
its probably a certainty that the cia or whatever will eventually get whatever plan the russians had for Trump and bury it next to kennedy's brain
Newsweek is rated as more than central-left bias, that's against the rules right?
Newsweek
I'm not trying to say I agree or disagree with the article, just that it seems to violate the rules.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0GCKXZTV8E
Actually in order for Donald Trump to have committed treason, we would have to have been in a declared military conflict with Russia, Saudi Arabia, or Turkey at the time. We may be in a second cold war, but until that war is declared by the congress, it's not technically possible to commit treason.
In other words, you'll be disappointed if you're expecting Donald Trump to be convicted under the literal definition of treason. That does not mean, however, that he won't be convicted on a myriad of other felonies and high crimes, including conspiracy against the United States, conspiracy to commit computer crimes, obstruction of justice, lying to congress/federal prosecutors (by the time this is all over), and other immoral non-criminal offenses like lying to the public.
Bottom line, Donald Trump doesn't need to be convicted of treason to rot in prison for the rest of his miserable, traitorous life.
Donald J. Trump has not committed capital-t Treason, but he sure as hell has committed treason, as represented by his involvement in an unknown number of related and/or directly interlinked criminal conspiracies, his repeated public and covert attempts to obstruct justice and tamper with witnesses, and very likely international financial fraud and money laundering in pursuit of subordinating American foreign policy for delivering his part in a quid pro quo exchange with the Kremlin.
I know I'm essentially restating what you said, but it's important to clarify that there's Treason, which is a specific defined criminal charge, and treason, a behaviour which very likely includes committing various criminal acts. Pro-Trump disinformation seeks to obscure the difference between the two and claim that because Trump cannot be said to have committed the textbook definition of Treason, his opponents have nothing.
Read the sticky. You can post any source deemed/verified credible. Least bias sources are just preferred now not the rule.
Dammit me know, everybody knows! Space, you, in it, we get it!
I’m kind of sick of these constant articles of “Donald Trump MIGHT be implicit in XYZ”
No doubt I believe he’s done all of it, but it just feels like it stirs a pot with no conclusion. Which starts to make people who might be teetering on the right side, feel like it’s fake or just an attack on Republicans or whatever.
So I read both stickies and still do not see where it says this. How is a source deemed/verified credible? Shouldn't this source, which was deemed left bias by mediabiasfactcheck, have a back-up source, as the most recent sticky suggests?
Or is a left bias still considered "medium" as the sticky suggests. A bit convoluted since mediabiasfactcheck doesn't have a "medium" category.
Also, maybe you should update that sticky to reflect that bias sources are allowed, just not preferred.
if only we had some sort of legislative oversight or something
pretty sure the Espionage Act doesn't need an actual declaration of war.
In fact, weren't we technically at peace time when we executed the Rosenbergs? Granted they practically gave the Soviets the nuke (going by current knowledge), but it was still peacetime.
Sadly this is the excuse they will use.
At least in Arnold's case he was being shit on and passed over constantly until he decided fuck this
I think
It's a picture of the blown up image on Trump's bedspread.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
