• Democrats request documents from 81 entities to begin Trump probe
    3 replies, posted
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/house-democrats-demand-documents-from-more-than-80-people-and-institutions-affiliated-with-trump/2019/03/04/51c249ec-3e87-11e9-922c-64d6b7840b82_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.cf7409807f6e House Democrats sent more than 80 letters Monday demanding documents from family members, business associates, political confidants and others with connections to President Trump, opening a sprawling investigation of whether he and his administration have engaged in obstruction of justice, corruption and abuse of power. The farthest-reaching request since Democrats took control of the House underscored lawmakers’ determination to hold Trump and those around him accountable for controversies that have dogged the president during his first two years in office — and perhaps lay the grounds for impeachment proceedings. Some of the bigger names: -Allen Weisselberg -Cambridge Analytica -Department of Justice -Trump Jr -Eric Trump -Erik Prince -FBI -George Nader -Hope Hicks -Jared Kushner -Jeff Sessions -Jerome Corsi -Julian Assange -Michael Cohen -Michael Flynn -Paul Manafort -Reince Priebus -Roger Stone -Sean Spicer -Steve Bannon -White House -Trump campaign -Trump Foundation -Trump Organization -Wikileaks -NRA
“We will act quickly to gather this information, assess the evidence, and follow the facts where they lead with full transparency with the American people,” Nadler said in a statement. “This is a critical time for our nation, and we have a responsibility to investigate these matters and hold hearings for the public to have all the facts. That is exactly what we intend to do.” Damn fucking straight, get it done
I’m interested to see what they’re going to do with the testimony where Michael told the committee that Felix Sater knew Mr. Trump, had a TrumpOrg email and an office on the same floor and across from Trump in Trump Tower. Donald was under oath in a separate investigation involving Felix stating he didn’t know who he was. That he couldn’t point him out if he was in the room with him. If I remember correctly it was two separate occasions he was under oath and stated that.
poor spicey
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.