• Barbara Streisand Defends Michael Jackson
    22 replies, posted
https://www.vulture.com/2019/03/barbra-streisand-on-michael-jackson-leaving-neverland-claims.html o the point that she suggests the alleged child abuse is in some way mitigated by the fact “it didn’t kill them.” Explained Streisand: “His sexual needs were his sexual needs, coming from whatever childhood he has or whatever DNA he has. You can say ‘molested’, but those children, as you heard say [the grown-up Robson and Safechuck], they were thrilled to be there.” Said Streisand: “They both married and they both have children, so it didn’t kill them.”
There's a Streisand effect joke somewhere here.
Uh. She didn't exactly defend him. She admitted the sexual abuse happened. But it was the parents fault for letting their kids near michael jackson. Saying "He has his sexual needs" So more like Enabling Apologist than defending.
Wow. Believe what you will about what Michael Jackson did, you don't defend someone else's alleged crimes by saying "the victims didn't die so it's okay".
she said explicitly "it didnt hurt them" thats basically defending or justifying his actions.
i mean thats why i said enabling. She's basically justifying the actions, which is fucked.
Sorry what, "whatever DNA he has"? That definitely needs clarification, does she think there's a pedo gene or is she making implications that certain groups of people are more likely to be pedos or what? What are you saying, Barbra Streisand?
She didn't defend him at all. Her comments didn't defend anything. She accepted the tabloid allegations as truth and then took the worst position possible. Here's a headline: Scientists Baffled By Woman's Incredible Ability To Fuck Up Every Time
tbf i've seen the tabloids being the ones defending MJ the past few weeks.
The dudes been dead for a decade. Little late to the party.
when he's dead and can't defend himself it's exceptionally easier to tear into his character and smear him
and also when he's dead. He can't pressure people into stopping them from revealing what happened
Streisand effect indeed. I actually feel sorry for MJ that his final legacy will be some crank documentary that plays with evidence to suggest that he's a pedo. Look, I get it - Vitiligo MJ looks like a fucking ghoul and his childlike glee is creepy as hell. But if he was really pulling a Saville then why the hell did it take his victims - who used to swear that no, MJ did not badtouch them before receiving epiphanies almost a decade later - so long to come forward, as opposed to Saville where they came forward immediately? It's a sad day indeed when the tabloids are the ones telling the truth ….
So what if he’s dead? Doesn’t change the fact that people are using his name, image and music to make money hand over fist.
this has to be the worst thing so far someone has said on this topic.
This is never a reasonable argument, there's immense victim blaming that comes with trying to come forward about this sort of thing, and speaking out can turn you into a public figure that gets incredible amounts of shit flung at them. Abusers can also manipulate children into not speaking out out of fear or loyalty, and by the time you're old enough to come to terms with it you've already got assholes saying "oh yeah well if you were abused why didn't you speak out about it immediately". It makes complete sense that someone would he unwilling to speak out until the recent larger movement of people speaking out about abuse in the entertainment industry, because now people have a better chance of actually being listened to.
Tbqh the only people who are making money off of him being dead was his deadbeat of a Father and his Family's Estate.
Oh I bring up Savile directly. Instead of taking about a decade, it took Savile's accusers only days to come forth with accusations. And with Savile, he didn't really have the rumors floating around before this. People made jokes about how close he was with kids but that's about it. MJ? The guy already accused with pedo alligations that he fought and won against? Oh, those post-mortem ones only came out about... ten or so years after his death... by house staff as well as former bodygaurds kicked out of his team for breaches of contract and by people who sat on this for about a decade before realizing they could gain something by going to the media first and the police never. Indeed, several of MJ's victims were already adults by the time he kicked it.
Do you realize how abuse works? Most of the time people who were abused only realize it later down the road. Oftentimes the gaslighting or grooming brainwashes them into thinking that what's happening isn't bad or if they reveal what happened. They would get in trouble. It ain't a fucking "Oh i'm aware that this is fucked right now". (I got gaslighted for 5-6 years until i realized it was abuse) https://youtu.be/jzF4kfFugmI He explains why he lied. Even if you don't believe him. Just listen, and think about it after.
"If you're caught your life will be over!" - I'm going to give him benefit of the doubt. He doesn't deserve it, but I'll give it to him just for a minute. Okay, so. So why did they go to the media about this first? Why did it take about ten years and some crank documentary to expose people to the truth rather then hard hitting evidence? Feds routinely raided Neverland Ranch. MJ must have hired Mr. Clean (a fictional character!) to dispose of the evidence because none was there. None existed while he was alive, and none existed posthumously. All we have are people with something to gain from 'exposing' the crimes of a dead man for ten minutes of fame as well as whatever cut those documentary producers are paying them.
Two words. Gaslighting and Grooming.
That's... What i mean, just let the dude rest. There was plenty of time to smear him when he was alive, now it's just literally beating a dead horse.
Its funny enough cause the Victims themselves also agree with this sentiment. They just want to explain what happened and get it over with. To get it off their chest.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.