very small fraction of those "ban appeals" are true
small enough to make each banappeal considered to be made by a cheater
eac is a complicated program, It may be hard to see if someone has cheated or not, especially when you have to check a hundred banappeals per day, mostly from cheaters
after a long time, when eac/fp notice something is wrong with this ban, a problem appears
unbanning someone after few months looks very bad, ppl will start complain about the reliability of eac, and it will ruin eac reputation, reducing chances of selling their product
but on the other hand, you can tell that this ban is valid, then he will write on forums about that he is falsebanned and ppl will start throwing shit at him thinking that he is another "falsebanned", and he will be buried under hundreds of similar banappeals from "falsebanned", if nobody believed it then problem solved! no ppl butthurt about reliability of eac as well destroying reputation of eac, only at cost of one player, which most likely will pay again for rust
Guilty until proven innocent. What does it take to get false banned?
We have come a long way in catching cheaters and EAC is a company dedicated on just catching cheaters. sure there is some mistakes, but creating a simple ticket with EAC will resolve the issue if it was a false ban.
When you get suspected of cheating, multiple screenshots are being sent to them for evidence as well as movement data and other logs.
If you have been falsely banned, you will get untanned after creating the ticket. If EAC have not unbanned you then fuck you, you are a cheater.
The system works but there will always be cheaters with huge wallets.
Does your negative reaction confirm what i said?
you are throwing shit at me only because someone important said in more than 99% of banappeals "you are cheater"
also eac showed many times that ticket is not enough
Negative Reaction??? throwing shit at you??? are you stupid. I'm out of this discussion.
Didnt you try to say im wrong and cheater?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
