• Magma VS Oxide
    14 replies, posted
Hey, So I am going to start developing some plugins for my server but I don't know which is better. I am familiar with both LUA and OOP so I have no problem using either Magma or Oxide for plugin development, but which do you guys find better? I am conflicted as they both seem pretty equally matched except for the crappy documentation that Magma offers. Thanks guys. GreenFanta
I prefer Magma for 3 reasons; I find OOP much easier to use when writing plugins The Magma team are much more involved with the community and also keep us up to date with issues/eta's They are Australians, i have to support my countrymen! :D
[QUOTE=MudcrabWarr;44142324]I prefer Magma for 3 reasons; I find OOP much easier to use when writing plugins The Magma team are much more involved with the community and also keep us up to date with issues/eta's They are Australians, i have to support my countrymen! :D[/QUOTE] I like Australians. One of my friends from there takes it on a funny way that you guys often have a bad ping. To quote him: "I'm Australian, I'm used to have a bad ping". I really hope you guys get a better connection sometime. And I'm going to read a little bit about "Magma". Seemsto be nice.
I say magma just because it being able to use JavaScript which makes it a hell of alot easier for me to code since I have taken 3 years of java coding.
[QUOTE=TheRagingJ;44142497]I say magma just because it being able to use JavaScript which makes it a hell of alot easier for me to code since I have taken 3 years of java coding.[/QUOTE] Java and JS are 2 completely different things.
[QUOTE=h4x!;44142811]Java and JS are 2 completely different things.[/QUOTE] Well, in that case i guess i can say i am just now learning JavaScript. However it is still easy to pick up for me.
if Oxide used java/javascript/c# or anything similar to that syntax i would probably have used that and not made Magma, i simply can't stand LUA, so we chose Javascript due to popularity (C#, java, C, C++) programmers and even web developers understand it easily. I agree our documentation is crappy at the moment, bare in mind it is only 1 week old whilst Oxide has had 2 months to mature.
[QUOTE=xEnt22;44143743]if Oxide used java/javascript/c# or anything similar to that syntax i would probably have used that and not made Magma, i simply can't stand LUA, so we chose Javascript due to popularity (C#, java, C, C++) programmers and even web developers understand it easily. I agree our documentation is crappy at the moment, bare in mind it is only 1 week old whilst Oxide has had 2 months to mature.[/QUOTE] Thank you for your prompt response! I have undoubtedly made my decision. As a web developer I would feel more comfortable working in the OOP enviroment (With JavaScript). You are welcome to contact me if I can, in anyway, help with the development of Magma in anyway. I will contribute to the WIKI best I can.
LUA is horrid. Magma 4tw.
I've used Magma on my server, reported a bug on the forums, it was fixed the next day! Really great stuff! I am very excited to see how involved they are with the community and keeping us up to date on development. Couldn't be happier choosing Magma. :dance:
Used both. Prefer magma and their community.
team magma
To be honest i have not tested Magma yet on my server but will give it a try as soon as possible :)
I have been using MAGMA & RUST++ for about a week. After all the setup and plugins I have installed the only thing left I wanted to do was change the SERVER NAME that displays messages in-game. It seems this has now been locked down with the latest update 1.1.5 and the name MAGMA is now enforced along with a server log in message that cannot be removed. after hours of set up and configuring multiple plugins I'm so unhappy about this I have decided to move to OXIDE for one reason only. The ability to set my own server name. [url]http://forum.rustoxide.com/resources/chat-name.432/reviews[/url] For a game that is still in ALPHA there already seems to be a lot of buddy/buddy going on to secure a place in the RUST Market before it goes mainstream.
Essentials is the easiest and best man ;) good luck!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.