[BUG] Linux Certificate issue

[theeggman]

I know there is some information in other threads, but I figured it might be a good idea to have this issue in one spot easy to find.

ERROR building certificate chain: System.ArgumentException: certificate ---> System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException: Unsupported hash algorithm: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11
  at Mono.Security.X509.X509Certificate.VerifySignature (System.Security.Cryptography.RSA rsa) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at Mono.Security.X509.X509Certificate.VerifySignature (System.Security.Cryptography.AsymmetricAlgorithm aa) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates.X509Chain.IsSignedWith (System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates.X509Certificate2 signed, System.Security.Cryptography.AsymmetricAlgorithm pubkey) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates.X509Chain.Process (Int32 n) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates.X509Chain.ValidateChain (X509ChainStatusFlags flag) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates.X509Chain.Build (System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates.X509Certificate2 certificate) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
  at System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates.X509Chain.Build (System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates.X509Certificate2 certificate) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  at System.Net.ServicePointManager+ChainValidationHelper.ValidateChain (Mono.Security.X509.X509CertificateCollection certs) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
Please, report this problem to the Mono team

used the following options:

./RustDedicated -batchmode -logFile out.log +server.identity "linux" +server.hostname "Linux Test Server" +server.seed 6738

Is there any known fix or workaround for this problem? (So far as I'm aware, there is not as of yet.)
Last I read, garry mentioned this has to do with packet encryption and he was going to look into it. And he was thinking about perhaps giving us an option to disable encryption?

Thanks.