"Maximum GENERIC" - a Delta Force operator leaps over a car in NY - Garry's Mod

[img]http://i43.tinypic.com/23w66x5.jpg[/img] [B][URL="http://i42.tinypic.com/sdlgzk.jpg"]Full resolution[/URL] [URL="http://comparescreenshots.slicx.com/comparison/48437"]Comparison[/URL][/B] ----------------------- [B]Other edits:[/B] [URL="http://filesmelt.com/dl/achestycrisis.jpg"]The Castro[/URL] [URL="http://i468.photobucket.com/albums/rr49/shampooey/e14scicopy.png"]bubbo[/URL] [URL="http://filesmelt.com/dl/crysis_pic_editt.jpg"]Egg_Toaster[/URL] [URL="http://www.cubeupload.com/files/b26200competition.jpg"]GoldenBullet[/URL] ----------------------- Sorry if you can see any crappy jpeg compression - it was not set to 100 in game because [I]Garry's Mod[/I] hates me. C&C and all that jazz, please!

Looks realy god nice editing.

[QUOTE=Thomo;21307643]oh god his foot is on fire[/QUOTE] [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perspective_(visual)"]Hurr[/URL] :downs:

Its hard to believe some of these pics are done in gmod, they just look too good. Awesome job dude.

Damn I'm waiting so bad for Crysis 2. The picture is great except for the fire, is a bit too opaque.

Go easy on the burning, jeez. In broad daylight, next to a [I]fire[/I] no shadow would be that dark.

The fire looks a bit too low-res.

[QUOTE=Zeraxify;21311582]Go easy on the burning, jeez. In broad daylight, next to a [I]fire[/I] no shadow would be that dark.[/QUOTE] Do you have any idea what artistic is? Your constantly being negative when people just want they're pictures to look cool!

I haven't said the picture doesn't look cool, in fact, it looks very cool. The shadows are a bit heavy, that's all :devil:

[QUOTE=Zeraxify;21311689]I haven't said the picture doesn't look cool, in fact, it looks very cool. The shadows are a bit heavy, that's all :devil:[/QUOTE] When you mention nothing BUT the negative you look like you hate the picture, try and balance your replies! :clint:

Maybe you're right :crossarms: [editline]10:19PM[/editline] Sorry Chesty :c [editline]10:20PM[/editline] And GoldenBullet.

[QUOTE=Zeraxify;21311825]Maybe you're right :crossarms: [editline]10:19PM[/editline] Sorry Chesty :c [editline]10:20PM[/editline] And GoldenBullet.[/QUOTE] D'aw. Thats ok man :love:

[QUOTE=The Combine;21311631]The fire looks a bit too low-res.[/QUOTE] It's a 1024x768 reference picture made smaller. The resolution is fine. Perhaps what you are seeing is the depth-of-field and/or motion-blur. [QUOTE=Zeraxify;21311582]Go easy on the burning, jeez. In broad daylight, next to a [I]fire[/I] no shadow would be that dark.[/QUOTE] I disagree. I exaggerated a little, but I think you'll find that a lot of shadows are very dark indeed in strong sunlight, darker than they would be if it was, say, an overcast day, especially if the shadows are being cast onto dark material like this nanosuit here. Here is some proof: [img]http://generalbrock.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/done_soldier500big.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.cbc.ca/gfx/images/news/photos/2009/02/20/soldier-cp-w-5141713.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.whereistheoutrage.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/american-soldier.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.globalpov.com/images/soldier.jpg[/img] [img]http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/11_01/063terrybryan_228x543.jpg[/img]

Those are all in a desert-y area, imagine being in a city. There would by stuff reflecting the sun-light and stuff like that. Still good picture though, have an artistic.

[QUOTE=Zeraxify;21311935]Those are all in a desert-y area, imagine being in a city. There would by stuff reflecting the sun-light and stuff like that.[/QUOTE] :what:

Hate to say it, but you really could have done a lot better with this one Chesty. For the most part the lighting looks nice (though like Zerax said, it [I]does[/I] look a bit dark) but everything else looks rushed. The fire looks way too dark, and doesn't illuminate anything (making it look really pasted on) the motion blurring on his arm and gun doesn't effect his silhouette, giving it a sharp, bad looking edge, the cracks in the glass don't seem to match the perspective on the window, and even the muzzleflash looks kinda wonky. However, the biggest problem with the pic is the total lack of atmosphere. Apart from a bit of desaturation and a tiny bit of fog in the back, you barely changed a thing. The Castro had a better idea of what this picture's atmosphere could have been like, bleak, blue, and wartorn. Yours is way too colorful and hardly shows any signs of large scale battle. Soz broski :frown: [B]EDIT - [/B]And you didn't even give him a shadow on the car! For shame, doc...

[QUOTE=ChestyMcGee;21311959]:what:[/QUOTE] I try to sound smart, but I just end up being stupid :frown:

[QUOTE=The Vman;21311968]Hate to say it, but you really could have done a lot better with this one Chesty. For the most part the lighting looks nice (though like Zerax said, it [I]does[/I] look a bit dark) but everything else looks rushed. The fire looks way too dark, and doesn't illuminate anything (making it look really pasted on) the motion blurring on his arm and gun doesn't effect his silhouette, giving it a sharp, bad looking edge, the cracks in the glass don't seem to match the perspective on the window, and even the muzzleflash looks kinda wonky. However, the biggest problem with the pic is the total lack of atmosphere. Apart from a bit of desaturation and a tiny bit of fog in the back, you barely changed a thing. The Castro had a better idea of what this picture's atmosphere could have been like, bleak, blue, and wartorn. Yours is way too colorful and hardly shows any signs of large scale battle. Soz broski :frown:[/QUOTE] Thanks for the critique. I couldn't care less if one is entirely negative, but the fact someone takes time out to write something detailed and useful is more than enough for me. The nit-picking comments mentioning a single negative feature and nothing else are the ones that irritate me. [QUOTE=Zeraxify;21312005]I try to sound smart, but I just end up being stupid :frown:[/QUOTE] Btw here is a picture in a non-desert environment: [url]http://www.gunpundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/double-tap-airsoft-exercise-2.jpg[/url]

[QUOTE=The Vman;21311968]Hate to say it, but you really could have done a lot better with this one Chesty. For the most part the lighting looks nice (though like Zerax said, it [I]does[/I] look a bit dark) but everything else looks rushed. The fire looks way too dark, and doesn't illuminate anything (making it look really pasted on) the motion blurring on his arm and gun doesn't effect his silhouette, giving it a sharp, bad looking edge, the cracks in the glass don't seem to match the perspective on the window, and even the muzzleflash looks kinda wonky. However, the biggest problem with the pic is the total lack of atmosphere. Apart from a bit of desaturation and a tiny bit of fog in the back, you barely changed a thing. The Castro had a better idea of what this picture's atmosphere could have been like, bleak, blue, and wartorn. Yours is way too colorful and hardly shows any signs of large scale battle. Soz broski :frown:[/QUOTE] You see THAT right there is an example of a quality reply! :golfclap: ... Don't mind me just appreciating it :)

[QUOTE=Thomo;21311433]Take a step back here, I believe we need a set of batteries for this here peron's sarcasm detector.[/QUOTE] Sorry it doesn't convey well in this text only format. Regardless I'm not one to take advice from a Nazi.

My Filesmelt link is broken, so here is a Tinypic link. :cheers: [url]http://i44.tinypic.com/wtdukp.jpg[/url] It's big so I won't put image tags. :/

[QUOTE=The Castro;21313425]My Filesmelt link is broken, so here is a Tinypic link. :cheers: [URL]http://i44.tinypic.com/wtdukp.jpg[/URL] It's big so I won't put image tags. :/[/QUOTE] He already has your edit posted...

But the link still doesn't work, because it's from Filesmelt, so that is a new one.

omg, i know the fire your using looks pretty good but you've done better muzzleflash for example

Contrary to you, Hellfire, I'm really feelin' this muzzleflash. Imo, one of your best.

that's cool!

Neat lighting/shading, but that fire is too dark, imo.

[QUOTE=JurajIsNotPirat;21325778]Neat lighting/shading, but that fire is too dark, imo.[/QUOTE] Thanks! I know what you mean now that I look at it. That's because of the smoke over it though, not because the layer itself is dark... hm I probably shouldn't have put a smoke layer over it.

[QUOTE=ChestyMcGee;21325797]Thanks! I know what you mean now that I look at it. That's because of the smoke over it though, not because the layer itself is dark... hm I probably shouldn't have put a smoke layer over it.[/QUOTE] No damnit you shouldn't have! Think of the children