American soldier finishes off shell-shocked german soldiers
16 replies, posted
BLAPBLAP
idk didnt have a cool soundeffect for this one :v:
[img]http://filesmelt.com/dl/dod_jagd0001.png[/img]
knightguys3amhere
America! Fuck yeah!
I love how the fire is so vibrant compared to the rest of the picture.
Dude really cool, love the color choice looks almost realistic
[QUOTE=JurajIsNotPirat;32210658]I love how the fire is so vibrant compared to the rest of the picture.[/QUOTE] Play World at War, then you'll understand why.
why does the stone burn anyway
Really nice picture! Good job Angry man.
thanks guys :D
Nasty, But cool as always :v:
lol why is the rock on fire
[QUOTE=-nesto-;32212757]lol why is the rock on fire[/QUOTE]
Dunno
good enough
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/uwL7G.gif[/IMG]
I feel if its shellshock then there should be some signs of some artillery fire or at least some looming smoke and some rugged up Germans.
[QUOTE=Vasili;32213458]I feel if its shellshock then there should be some signs of some artillery fire or at least some looming smoke and some rugged up Germans.[/QUOTE]
yeah I forgot to add the smoke, it was 3am when i edited this :l
The blood's okay, although I think you should have used one less sharpen filter. I probably wouldn't have done any better myself.
A muzzleflash is fire escaping from the barrel. The muzzleflash and fire should be relatively the same color. Fire also creates ambient light. It looks like you did that for the two men on the steps, but not for the body on the bottom right. I'm also not sure, but if a shell or some shit blew the wall up, I would imagine there would be less fire. I don't have anything to compare that to, so I don't know. The dark shading next to the fire doesn't look great, either. I'm not 100% sure it's necessary, but it might look better with it than without it, so I'm not sure.
If I'm being even more nitpicky, I could say I don't like the camera angle. There's a fair amount of wasted space at the top. Personally, I would only use an angle like this if I'm purely testing editing and editing only, which I don't think anybody should really do unless they're experimenting with something new. Maybe I just like more cinematic poses.
[editline]10th September 2011[/editline]
Was that dismembered corpse edited?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.