the depth of field is going to make me implode at some point how do i make [I]real good[/I] dof
[QUOTE=Soul_;52002050]Harley pic is more interesting imo.[/QUOTE]
depends what you're into I guess.
ptsd tommies or latex tiddies
just noticed that Harley's thumb clips through the upper part of the revolver's grip
Where abouts?
actually wait, is that even clipping or is the gun just shaped like that
[img]http://wduwant.com/index_uploads/uploads/671a5a3ad100.png[/img]
I think it's just the grip but I am not %100
The revolver is just shaped like that. I've never used that specific model but I've seen revolvers like that plenty enough to know that's just how they curve:
[img]http://labscdn2.luckygunner.com/labs/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Colt-Python-6-inch-e1360072955977.jpg[/img]
They taper up near the top of the grip.
I believe it's so it's more comfortable when you rest your thumb behind/underneath it.
Tho I have never used a revolver, only time I've fired a handgun was when I was still in the army and we had browning hi-powers.
I've handled a disarmed Webley and I can corroborate that's 100% accurate. Some grips even have like.. an extra ridge to make your thumb stick under them more strongly.
Depth of Field on Photoshop?
And did you do anything special with the eyes?
Also, really beautiful! I love the story the face tells in the WW1 picture.
Nah the DoF is SFM, also I edited the face quite and bit; dirt, sunken eyes and a lot of tweaks to the shading on the eyes themselves.
I really, REALLY like what you did on the Harley pic. Really, I wouldn't be able to tell that it's SFM unless you'd told me. What does the unedited picture look like, for comparison?
Thanks!
This is the original
[t]https://i.gyazo.com/4c887106dc3909712027f45e7f5d57cb.png[/t]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
