Which is better in your opinion?
I vote for Bc2 because it is more challenging because theres no automatic air support to rely on for kills, and better gameplay overall.
It's not exactly a fair comparison, but I have had more fun with BC than MW
both mw2 has a cool story
bc2 has destructible enviroments and thats awesome
Modern Warfare 2
MW2 > Consolefags
BC2 > Med-core gamers & consolefags
I <3 BC2
MW2 should be burned
forever
I don't know, I won't vote only because I havent played Bad Company (any of them) yet. Modern Warfare 2 however is somewhat fun for a while. Hardcore Team Deathmatch is the only reason I play it online though. Everything else is kinda alright (except for bugs glitches and the like).
MW2 is an epic singleplayer and average multiplayer.
Reverse for BC2.
They're both brilliant, and not very comparable. The gameplay is completely different, regardless of the type of game.
Battlefield Bad Company 2 will probably last you much longer than Modern Warfare 2 will. While there are only a few modes in BFBC2 and only one set of ranks, the ranks become challenging to achieve at higher levels and their rewards are still greatly beneficial. In Modern Warfare 2 I breezed through my first prestige within three days and all you get from there is an extra class slot every so often and a new emblem and title for every prestige rank. Overall BFBC2 has better features as well - not to mention dedicated servers.
gee this totally won't be a one-sided poll
BC2 is fun and satisfying all the way into my second week now, where MW2 got boring after the first day.
I think my, and most people's opinion will be slightly bias because BC2 came out a while after MW2 and that a lot of people were bored with MW2.
I thought MW2 was great and I am not one of the bandwagoners who repeatedly shit on the game because they need to have their e-peen filled with agrees, but BC2 is way better.
Oh god, not another one of these threads... :suicide:
[editline]09:58PM[/editline]
I would have to say BC2
Singleplayer: Modern Warfare 2
Multiplayer: Bad Company 2
And stop fucking making x vs y polls, they're as biased as fuck.
Late. Learn to search.
We have already established that facepunch prefers BC2
I refuse to vote because i love them both equally.
Plus they're pretty hard to compare.
I might be stupid but the controls of BC2 don't fit right for me.
I laughed at the references in BC2 tough "snowmobiles are for pussies".
I was watching a review some time back about BC2, and what the guy said is so true in my opinion.
"This is Dice's take on the Modern warfare gameplay. Experience, perks the whole shibang"
Bad company 2 is still better in my opinion
I like both, but i like BC2 more.
BC2 has "longer than three hour" campaign.
111 to 15. Mw2 is left in the dust.
[editline]08:51AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=ToXiCsoldier;20914073]I might be stupid but the controls of BC2 don't fit right for me.
I laughed at the references in BC2 tough "snowmobiles are for pussies".[/QUOTE]
He says "Snowmobiles are for sissies". Though sweetwater does say that the government will just send in some special ops douchebags with pussy heartbeat monitors on their guns
[QUOTE=imadaman;20914293]BC2 has "longer than three hour" campaign.[/QUOTE]
Bad argument, i completed both within 4 hours. (each game 4 hours, not together.)
If you are into single player then modern warfare 2. If you are into team working multiplayer then bad company 2.
[QUOTE=Spaztastik;20914116]I was watching a review some time back about BC2, and what the guy said is so true in my opinion.
"This is Dice's take on the Modern warfare gameplay. Experience, perks the whole[B] shibang"[/B]
Bad company 2 is still better in my opinion[/QUOTE]
Despite the fact that the Battlefield series had unlocks and ranks long before MW ever came out.
[QUOTE=ripsipiirakk;20915166]If you are into single player then modern warfare 2. If you are into team working multiplayer then bad company 2.[/QUOTE]
This. Except I like both, so I liked both games equally. Plus, BC2 doesn't have co-op.
[QUOTE=ToXiCsoldier;20914831]Bad argument, i completed both within 4 hours. (each game 4 hours, not together.)[/QUOTE]
It's not a bad argument. MW2 campaign is needlessly short(READ: 5 fucking hours) just so they can set it up for a third game. It could have easily been double the length and they could have had a conclusion to the story. BC2 is about 2 hours longer which is only one hour shorter than the typical shooter these days.
BC 2 because the multi player feels well balanced unlike the laggy hacker fest that is MW 2. Kill streaks where a huge pain in the ass in MW 2 half the time I couldn't even move from where I spawned before being anally raped by an AC-130 of chopper gunner.
I played the beta of BC2.
Didn't enjoy it so I never purchased the game.
I loved Modern Warfare 2. ( Don't care what anyone else thinks )
It was enjoyable, plus all the Pro gamers rage quit cause of noobs.
So now it's not that bad.
I want to know what's the amazing thing about BC2? It just doesn't look/feel like a good game.
[QUOTE=WelshTed;20916211]I played the beta of BC2.
Didn't enjoy it so I never purchased the game.
I loved Modern Warfare 2. ( Don't care what anyone else thinks )
It was enjoyable, plus all the Pro gamers rage quit cause of noobs.
So now it's not that bad.
I want to know what's the amazing thing about BC2? It just doesn't look/feel like a good game.[/QUOTE]
Beta =/= full game. BC2 isn't an unbalanced pile of crap.
BC2 for less hackers
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
