Mass Effect 2, anyone? - Games

I, for one, am ridiculously pumped for this game to come out on the 26th. The first ME was the greatest RPGs that I've ever played (IMO) and I can't wait to see where Commander Shepard and the Normandy go next. A great looking continuation of an already amazing game. I have my pre-order set and ready to go.

There is a thread for this [url]http://www.facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=844577[/url]

Well, in my opinion, Mass Effect was one of the worst RPG's I have ever played.

[QUOTE=Da_Arwin;19472798]Well, in my opinion, Mass Effect was one of the worst RPG's I have ever played.[/QUOTE] No need to bump a thread for your opinion when theres a perfectly good thread already on the front page. Unless you want to avoid any ridicule, which you will get anyway.

[QUOTE=Da_Arwin;19472798]Well, in my opinion, Mass Effect was one of the worst RPG's I have ever played.[/QUOTE] What other RPGs have you played, then

IMO mass effect had every core aspect an RPG should have 1. loading screens every 5 seconds 2. more talking than action don't get me wrong I loved the game but bioware could've done better

[QUOTE=bepassley;19474594]IMO mass effect had every core aspect an RPG should have 1. loading screens every 5 seconds 2. more talking than action don't get me wrong I loved the game but bioware could've done better[/QUOTE] 1. Loading screens every 30mins at most (take away citadel and normandy). 2. Depending on your mood you can just breeze through the talking and the game is more like 98% action. I just don't see how those would generalise the bad points of the game, doesn't Bioware have a reputation for deep story telling?

[QUOTE=Da_Arwin;19472798]Well, in my opinion, Mass Effect was one of the worst RPG's I have ever played.[/QUOTE] Your opinion sucks dick.

[QUOTE=bepassley;19474594] 2. more talking than action [/QUOTE] Games are meant for entertainment, that's like saying a movie is instantly better if it has 100% action, opposed to having less action but more of a storyline. Not everyone is entertained solely from action.

[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;19477814]Your opinion sucks dick.[/QUOTE] Now now it doesn't suck, it just doesn't fit. If s/he gave reasons why it sucked (and if the reasons were just plain stupid) then the opinion sucks.

[QUOTE=jechtman;19477781]1. Loading screens every 30mins at most (take away citadel and normandy). 2. Depending on your mood you can just breeze through the talking and the game is more like 98% action. I just don't see how those would generalise the bad points of the game, doesn't Bioware have a reputation for deep story telling?[/QUOTE] Mass Effect had a decent story, but I can't give it the credit I used to after playing Dragon Age. While that game is polar opposite of Mass Effect (Great Story > shit gameplay) Bioware still seemed to of learned how to develop a story. [editline]09:16PM[/editline] [QUOTE=deathrat;19477878]Games are meant for entertainment, that's like saying a movie is instantly better if it has 100% action, opposed to having less action but more of a storyline. Not everyone is entertained solely from action.[/QUOTE] Perfect example of my point is Noveria "Ok, find Matriarch.. ok now I need to get a garage pass.. ok what the fuck now I have to sneak into some offices oh look finally some action.. oh ok now I should go back oh wait you wanna talk to me too? better deal? oh just give me the damn garage pass. [insert linear driving sequence after sitting through 5-6 elevator scenes]" deathrat you still pot words into my mouth, I never said an rpg shouldn't be story driven, that was meant to be taken lightly.